As all of you know, I’m very much in favor of Brett Kavanaugh filing a defamation and slander suit in the District Court against Christine Ford, Deborah Ramirez and Julie Swetnick. I would also name Debbie Katz and Michael Avenatti (yes, folks, I really DO know what his last name is – it’s just that “Avenutti” seems infinitely more appropriate, given what I believe to be his precarious mental state) as co-defendants. If we find that Monica McLean and certain Senators from our most Western states had a part in this, name them too.
Such a suit is certainly unprecedented. But then, the nature of the Blitzkrieg that was unleashed against JUSTICE Kavanaugh’s (how much do you love saying that?) reputation and character was in a different astral plane than anything we’d ever seen before. Even when they were so offended by the nomination of Clarence Thomas, they only trotted out the spurned Anita Hill, she of the testimony lifted straight out of the pages of a horror novel and porno film ads from the Village Voice. Because federal employees were involved, the FBI did an investigation. Took three days. The 302’s indicated that Anita Hill had, in fact, made it up.
I have several reasons why I would like to see this lawsuit filed. First, it might, just might, make it impossible for the Democrats to convince the next crop of 11th hour fictional accusers to come forward on the promise that once they’ve completed their jackhammering of the target’s character, they can fly back to their belfries without fear of repercussions and with some lovely parting gifts. I’m not all that hopeful on this front; attention whores like Avenutti and Gloria Allwet cannot help themselves; however, since both are currently being investigated by the State Bar of California, maybe the findings will put them out of our misery.
No, I want it for the DISCOVERY. You see that word a lot when they’re talking about potential lawsuits, but very few people really understand what it is and the process. It is essentially the period that begins the minute the complaint is filed to about 30 days before trial. And the minute you are on notice that you’ve been sued, you don’t get to touch anything. No accidental erasing of emails, no feeding your dog the desk calendars, no sending cartons of correspondence off to your Aunt Minnie’s cabin at Lake Sissymanunu. Which is, of course why you get your summons served as quickly after you file the complaint as possible. Until they are on notice, they are free to do what they want, barring statutory document retention requirements (this is mostly corporate in nature; no law requires you to save your personal correspondence for a period of years, although the IRS has a requirement; but I’ve recently learned that even if you follow it, apparently people from the New Delhi office will be contacting you to advise you that your arrest is imminent and the lawsuit is on file at the Courthouse. But you can clear your name through the purchase of nifty iTunes cards at Walgreens).
Because discovery against these three women will be delicious. First, interrogatories and production of documents. Give us the goodies and answer the questions in writing. These, by the way, are answered under oath. You VERIFY the responses. Even so, there is nothing sexy about written discovery.
But it’s the defendants’ depositions that will be so entertaining, they should be on pay-per-view or Netflix. I’d like to ask Ford why her so-called “escape” door that caused so much sturm and drang in her marriage that it required counseling in 2012 after being constructed in 2008 doesn’t even go into her main residence but to her rental property? I mean, where does she live? The Winchester Mystery House? I also would like to question her on her incredible x-ray vision. Because apparently she can see boys “pinballing off the stairway” while hiding behind the locked door of a bathroom. But more importantly, I’d like to know why she and four other people were breaking into houses to drink beer and throw impromptu parties, since apparently NONE of the individuals she names as being at the event lived in the house. Indeed, none of them even lived anywhere close to the Country Club. Perhaps we can consult the Montgomery County sheriff’s office and ask about this 1980s’s high school home invasion crime spree.
Next up on the deposition docket? Debbie Ramirez. I’d ask her how many days she spent with her cell phone in one hand and her Yale rolodex in the other, calling everyone she knew for dirt. I’d also like to ask why she needed to spend six grueling days with her lawyer in order to remember what had happened to her. (I’m thinking they picked “lawyer” for this because they’d already exhausted the therapist angle with Professor High-Talker and they needed someone with privilege attaching): So first she alleges Brett “woo-woo’d” her a party? No one noticed? Because unless you’re John Holmes, you’re not whipping your schlong out in front of everybody – sorry, but you’re ASKING for humiliation from anyone with a inch to spare. Then it was she couldn’t be sure it was Brett. I’d ask her to describe the offending member. Also at that point I’d whip out my photo array of Bluto, Flounder and Neidermeyer and ask her to label each.
Actually Julie the Psycho would be the most fun. Especially since she’s represented by the creepy porn lawyer. I tend to think none of the Democrats on the Committee invited the CPL to the slander party, and since he can’t stand being on the outside looking in so he launched his Honda scooter through the living room window and crashed. Since CPL started hinting about the allegations on the 23rd, the same day as Ramirez, he was probably pissed she got there first. So Julie the Nutjob needs to be asked when she first spoke to Avenutti. When did you sign an engagement agreement? When did you execute your now-famous sworn statement? Did CPL walk around the room muttering “4Chan”? And please – even back in the early 70’s, anyone over the age of 18 that had graduated would not have been caught dead at a party with kids still in high school; doing that is the social equivalent of putting a beanie with a propeller on your head for Rush Week. And seriously, “people as old as 25.” Come ON, every guy with half a brain over 18 knows “16 will get you 20” and they are not going to willingly put themselves in a situation where the slutted up drunk girl in the corner gets you an orange jump suit, complete with matching bracelets. And what would women in their 20’s be doing there? Husband hunting?
Do I seem callous? Probably. Do I seem indifferent to the plight of women that are sexually assaulted? Also probably. Am I? Sometimes to the first, never to the second. If these women with their lies and smear were victims I’d have nothing but sympathy for them. But they are not victims of sexual assault. I DON’T believe anything ever happened to Dr. Ford – she’s been telling nothing but big little lies since this began. Debbie Ramirez? She lied because they needed to up the ante when Kavanaugh didn’t fold. But Julie Swetnick and her monstrous allegations need to be disinfected in the sunlight of public disdain. And every one of them needs to be prosecuted for the vile statements they’ve made – under oath.
Oh I have a great deal of sympathy for the victims in this matter. And there are four of the, not three. And their last names are Kavanaugh.
nicely said!
thx
i want pelts on the wall and i want the false accusers and their handlers to feel PAIN.
this is the ONLY way to get control of this
Barbarian, how does this not get thrown out on Sullivan? Anything discovered in the meantime would never see the light of day.
I don’t think Kavanaugh is the best route for this until Sullivan is gone.
I think the Senate is via Grassley. He’s GOT a lot of stuff already (see his timeline, links posted downstairs from Gateway Pundit).
Now THIS – I had no idea! Really?
Anita Hill, she of the testimony lifted straight out of the pages of a horror novel and porno film ads from the Village Voice. Because federal employees were involved, the FBI did an investigation. Took three days. The 302’s indicated that Anita Hill had, in fact, made it up.
from the NYT.
<White women benefit from patriarchy by trading on their whiteness to monopolize resources for mutual gain
Kirsten Gillibrand is gonna go all Rachael what’s-her-name-I-identify-as-black by Wednesday
https://twitter.com/nytopinion/status/1048711795203031040
This is the actual picture/headline of the above-referenced NYT article. Park Slope just ignited. God, I hope they run on this
White Women, Come Get Your People
They will defend their privilege to the death
https://twitter.com/CorieWhalen/status/1048860294125162499
https://thewildernessofmirrors.wordpress.com/2018/10/07/i-fear-all-we-have-done-is-to-awaken-a-sleeping-giant-and-fill-him-with-a-terrible-resolve-isoroku-yamamoto/
@ doriangrey:
crossposted your article and the main post over at gab
they seem to like them
rain of lead wrote:
Why thank you rain. I have a gab account, but the format confuses the hell out of me.
@ doriangrey:
I just di there what I do here
find links to things I find interesting and post
I don’t really talk to anyone over there
just postpostpost
Damn. Well said.
@ doriangrey:
I tried posting on Twitter. Are you suspended ?
@ eaglesoars:
Sullivan is not an absolute defense. Several “public figures” have sued and won libel suits – most notably Carol Burnett against the National Enquirer. Sullivan just requires a higher standard of proof. You must prove that the offending party KNOWINGLY made statements against a public figure that they knew to be false and were malicious in their intent. I think when the timeline of Ford is revealed, we’re going to find she absolutely knew the statements she made were false, that this was done solely for the purpose of smearing Kavanaugh’s good name – and Ramirez and Swetnick have real problems with their statements. Especially Swetnick.
If Kavanaugh prevailed at the District Court level, the appeal would need to be taken by the defendants. Whether they would or not is iffy – there’s an old saying on appeal – be careful what you wish for. If it gets all the way to SCOTUS and they grant cert, there’s no going back. Antonin Scalia was always hoping for a case that would allow the Court to overturn the precepts of Sullivan, in that the case essentially denied equal protection to a select group of individuals. This is the one that could do it (of course Kavanaugh would need to recuse himself but I think even the liberal justices might go with the conservatives on this one).
@ The Barbarian:
Thank you.
Personally, I think the risks here are too high. If Kavanaugh lost, Sullivan is even more deeply entrenched.
I prefer the Senate route for another reason also – it sets up institutional opposition to The Deep State. Katz, Bromwich, Avenatti would be just as vulnerable as their clients.
@ eaglesoars:
That’s true – the “careful what you wish for” can be even more relevant at SCOTUS level. Bakke is a perfect example. The University of California couldn’t live with the California Supreme Court decision siding with Allen Bakke and so they took cert to SCOTUS and LOST. As a result, quotas were deemed unconstitutional and the concept of “reverse discrimination” is on the books. Liberals didn’t like that too much.
McConnelll was on Laura Ingraham’s show Friday – and from his statements it appears that the Senate is indeed looking into these allegations against Kavanaugh. I just don’t want them to back away from it when the climate calms down.
And you know, this whole “his temperament and rudeness” argument is pure and utter BS. That man was questioned for 31 hours in front of that Committee, answered their often hostile questioning with grace and honesty. Anyone that snarks at him for his justified anger at the smear tactics is full of it.
eagles – I missed the premier of Versailles last night – recording the repeat this evening. Was it good?
@ eaglesoars:
The FBI did not find any basis or corroboration for the claims being made by Anita Hill. The “made it up” is me not being politically correct.
There is something in that FBI report submitted to the Senate that really really made Grassley angry. Feinstein left the room looking like she’d been gut punched by Lindsay Graham when no one was looking. Made the silly “what’s not in it” statement and then admitted that she didn’t even read the full report (so how would you know, Dirty Dianne?). In response to DiFi, I’d say “I’ll take ‘what is corroboration’ for $400, Alex), I think she got about 100 pages into it and realized the jig is up.
What I’d like to know is if President Trump can ask the FBI to release the report to the public.
The Barbarian wrote:
OH FUCK!!
@ The Barbarian:
Bsrbarian, really great analysis of the whole sordid mess.
You are correct that Sullivan would not bar defamation suits just that the bar is higher.
Even if the suits are brought could the defendants assert the absolute defense that this allegations are true?
Nobody seriously doubts that their allegations ar bull, so how does the plaintiff prove the untruth?
The Barbarian wrote:
San Fran Nan already did it. Did you see this?
Today is a profoundly heart-breaking day. The @SenateGOP Majority has done violence to the reputation of both the Senate Judiciary Committee & Supreme Court. I will file a FOIA request so that the public can see the FBI report & underlying documents.
And whoever is running the twitter account for the Senate Judiciary is brutal.
Here’s a link if helpful: https://efoia.fbi.gov/
The links for the URLs are really ugly so I’ll just post the twitchy thing
https://twitchy.com/samj-3930/2018/10/07/ooomg-nancy-pelosi-gets-all-tough-with-senate-judiciary-files-foia-request-on-fbi-report-their-response-is-legendary/?utm_campaign=twitchywidget
Without even watching the video, the photo at the top is hilarious in its lack of self-awareness. Check out the sign on the right side of the frame
lobo91 wrote:
I watched the video and her comment was gobbledygook.
She dropped some sophisticated words, strung them together saying nothing.
The wife of the missing president of Interpol says her husband sent her an image of a knife before he disappeared during a trip to their native China.
Making her first public comments on the mystery surrounding Meng Hongwei’s whereabouts, Grace Meng told reporters in Lyon, France on Sunday she thinks the knife was her husband’s way of trying to tell her he was in danger.
https://www.newsmax.com/world/globaltalk/meng-hongwei-sent-wife-knife/2018/10/07/id/885197/3
very strange indeed
@ coldwarrior:
China is saying he’s on the run because they’re investigating him for something or other – financial, IIRC
BREAKING: Interpol says Chinese official reported missing has resigned as agency’s president amid Beijing probe.
https://twitter.com/AP/status/1049006323545919489
@ eaglesoars:
Ahhhhhhhhh
The Democrat Justice System
@ eaglesoars:
Being repeated at 1:00 a.m. PDT this a.m., which would be 4:00 a.m. your time?
@ RIX:
Of course – they are allowed to put forth the affirmative defense that the allegations are true. But the interesting thing about affirmative defenses – just as you must prove the elements and counts in your complaint by a preponderance of the evidence, so it is the burden of the defense in the assertion of affirmative defenses – they also require proof by the same preponderance of the evidence. The standard defense is – we deny the allegations.
And this is where DISCOVERY comes in. My guess is that their attorneys would make every effort to settle. And I would certainly say go for it – but in this case, I would want the agreement to admit to their wrongdoing. None of this “by executing this agreement, Defendant does not admit to the allegations contained in the complaint.”
But I think eagles as it. Grassley is PISSED – he is not going to let this slide. I think the players in this sordid drama are in trouble.
@ The Barbarian:
The Dems learned from the Cardassians:
eaglesoars wrote:
he must have got too close to some chinese scam
https://www.foxnews.com/world/hairstylist-seen-in-video-kicking-pro-life-demonstrator-loses-job-may-face-charges
*will face charges*
while the victim says she will pursue charges against him.
@ coldwarrior:
Or the Clintons.
Awww….Julie Swetnick is disgusted and appalled by the criticism of her story.
If she thinks America loathes her NOW, wait’ll she sees what happens to her when she and Avenutti are exposed as making the whole thing up and are prosecuted for perjury. You swore out the statement, toots.
coldwarrior wrote:
It that doesn’t happen, then the dems will only be further emboldened and come back even more viciously when the next justice is nominated. Whether it is by Trump or future Republican president, it won’t matter. If there are no consequences for these vile, baseless attacks, the dems will continue to carry them out and amp up the intensity. There need to be hard consequences that put people in jail, make people lose their positions, and leave public life in disgrace. Not out of vindictiveness, but out of justice.
Looked back at the Sotmayor hearings. Yes, the Republicans pressed her, but never a personal attack, they were questions of judicial temperament — come on, applying “empathy” rather than the law? — constitutional knowledge and adherence — the kinds of things that a future SC justice should be grilled about. … and by the way, she failed that grilling miserably and was still seated.
doriangrey wrote:
Couldn’t leave a comment there. I liked your perspective on this. I think we have been too complacent for too long. Trump didn’t start this, Trump was a result of the discontent
in case you missed it
https://www.weaselzippers.us/399058-pence-tells-security-detail-lets-do-it-walks-down-senate-steps-waves-in-face-of-kavanaugh-protesters/
@ AZfederalist:
And she was confirmed with 68 votes.
Kagan–probably the least-qualified nominee in the modern era–got 63
@ rain of lead:
shorter
hey Nancy, how does my ass taste
Next time liberals talk about being “principled,” show them this:
dang
https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2018/oct/7/lindsey-graham-angry-over-brett-kavanaugh-confirma/
The Barbarian wrote:
I pray you are correct. This nonsense has to stop. The left has just made things worse and worse since they won with Bork
@ lobo91:
imagine, being that miserable in you life
lobo91 wrote:
No consequences there. But then, that’s to be expected of one of the propaganda ministers from a DNC media outlet.
right_wing2 wrote:
Yes, Somebody at Twitter did not like me calling Chelsea Handler a “Skank”.
The Barbarian wrote:
got it, set to record.
coldwarrior wrote:
Apparently, he is being detained in China. Not that anyone has actually SEEN him, but that is the ‘official’ word.
Is it odd that this Kasshogi person also goes missing at the same time? The Turks are saying the Saudis murdered him when he went to the Saudi embassy in Istanbul (I think that’s the story) but if the Saudi gov’t were going to off a public person, it would not be like that and the Erdogan gov’t is pathological.
Nobody has produced a body, dead or alive, in either case.
@ The Barbarian:
A friend emailed to tell me 3 investigators on Mueller’s team have resigned. BLOOD IN THE WATER. The Deep State is an international set of creatures. I believe we will see things accelerate now that this has cracked open (by their own hands).
coldwarrior wrote:
Or made too much money and doesn’t want to share.
@ eaglesoars:
@ yenta-fada:
its chinese, so its corrupt
coldwarrior wrote:
something has been ‘niggling’ at me. All these people who are manifestly certifiable. Men and women. Some of them are what shrinks would call ‘high functioning’. They have stable, well paying jobs, higher educations, all the outward signs of responsible adulthood.
But they’re not. And they’re not all millennials either. Referring to the ‘it can’t happen here’ idea in Dorian’s essay, I look at what I saw with these people and – have we seen this before? I’m not sure. Someone suggested we have w/Mao’s Cultural Revolution but I think this is a different animal. It DEFINITELY is not the Students for a Democratic Society of the ’60s. Certainly what I saw were a lot of zombified losers who have surrendered their own agency.
I wish someone would study these people, name them, find out their backgrounds (do all the women have issues with their fathers or something?)
When I read “My husband came home from work today and asked me how I was. I told him I wanted to pick up the Sword of Justice and slay every man on the planet” either that woman is an operative goading zombies or somebody should call the cops to dig up her back yard.
Maybe I’m wrong, but I think I HAVEN’T seen this before.
yenta-fada wrote:
not necessarily. The Manafort case is all but over, people have personal lives, etc.
@ eaglesoars:
closet psychos fed by the soft reinforcement of friends and likes…
social media makes them think that they are the sane ones.
coldwarrior wrote:
I think I would replace ‘sane’ with IMPORTANT. The phrase so many of them used was ‘my vote doesn’t MATTER’ or ‘my pain MATTERS’, etc. Somehow, this is giving them a sense of worth.
Sanity isn’t necessary, lack of it is proof that they’re scarred.
doriangrey wrote:
Wow. They must really hate the truth. You can recruit for jihad on twitter or meet up to burn Israeli flags. You are doing it wrong obviously.
eaglesoars wrote:
Indeed. Well said
eaglesoars wrote:
To quote HSThompson, “When things turn weird, the weird turn Pro.”
@ yenta-fada:
Buy the ticket, take the ride.
yenta-fada wrote:
It’s not a simple ‘vanishing’ of some faceless INTREPOL bureaucrat. It’s the bloody President of INTERPOL that’s been ‘vanished’ by the ChiComs. Their arrogance exceeds all bounds it seems. Rather than the Chinese having a snit with an INTERPOL bureaucrat or policeman over some million dollar scam, they have ‘vanished’ the President.
…. and the International Criminal Court is …… where…. on this outrage?
Usual place… hiding under their desks in the Hague as usual.
Another great thing that Trump has done is to unhitch the US rom that corrupt and cowardly court called the UN ICC.
@ Aussie Infidel:
It looks amazingly suspicious.
@ Aussie Infidel:
I couldn’t agree more about the ICC. When the Canadian Louise Arbour
served at the head of that body she turned full globalist monster. Then on the Supreme Court here she served up Justice for muslims and assorted identity groups. It’s like a virus.
What kind of mind control makes you act directly against your own best interests?
http://www.casasfumando.com/montecristo-espada/
I’m having the quillon, one year in the humidor.
@ yenta-fada:
The belief that you know better, are the elite, and are cashing in
@ eaglesoars:
Furthermore if you try and tell a Liberal/Democrat that Obama is a muslim, they look at you with smug disgust. Mass hypnosis, right?
@ yenta-fada:
Free will
@ coldwarrior:
Sounds like Kurt Schlichter’s new book:
So far, it’s good
@ lobo91:
I need to read that…after I’m done with this master’s degree
coldwarrior wrote:
I was listening to Dan Bongino, and he was saying people should warn their kids not to be too vocal about conservative views. He used Kavanaugh’s experience as an object lesson in a surveillance society. Watch what you do early in public because it keeps getting easier to learn everything about a person’s life. Hopefully the pendulum will swing the other way, but it won’t happen overnight.
lobo91 wrote:
Stealth best seller?!
coldwarrior wrote:
Monkey see, monkey do.
yenta-fada wrote:
Remember my SIL that I almost threw out of my house because she called me and our neighbor racists? Hubby’s son had a phone conversation w/her today. She hung up on him after lecturing him about his ‘white privilege’ and MARK JUDGE IS LYING!!
The woman is 81 yrs old.
@ eaglesoars:
I couldn’t live that angrily.
coldwarrior wrote:
I think it’s the only entertainment she gets
eaglesoars wrote:
Sadly not an outlier. Muslims and leftists always seem to point fingers at you and wag them about. Even on the phone. Hectoring and screaming DO IT MY WAY.
Barbarian:
Anita Hill, she of the testimony lifted straight out of the pages of a horror novel and porno film ads from the Village Voice.
I think it’s too much to hope that those ads from the Village Voice are still ‘findable’, but do you have any idea what the title of the novel might be or how I can find out?
yenta-fada wrote:
I think the umbrella term is ‘totalitarian’
HA! Credit where credit due.
Ben Shapiro: Justin Trudeau is what would happen if the song “Imagine” took human form and then ate a Tide Pod.
@ doriangrey:
You’re in good company these days. I’m not sure if James Woods has gotten his account out of the Gulag yet. I’m surprised I’ve gotten way with some of the comments I’ve made – especially when in a fit of pique I called Kamala Harris Senator Spread Your Legs.
I don’t suppose Ford has considered that Mark Judge might bring a lawsuit against her for slander and defamation, has she? No Sullivan protections on that one.
Well, FWIW
Two bullets ‘were found in pilot’s body’ after helicopter crash which killed senior Putin prosecutor linked to lawyer who held Trump Tower meeting
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-6249581/Pilot-shot-helicopter-crash-killed-senior-Putin-prosecutor.html
The Barbarian wrote:
he came back earlier this week
eaglesoars wrote:
I think it has to do with a bigger can of worms. It’s very complex and involves Vlad’s money I think. It was a topic during the Trump/Putin summit. Armstrong has a bunch of info on this.
The US Magnitsky Act, signed into law by then-President Barack Obama in 2012, authorizes the government to sanction Russian human rights offenders, freeze their assets, and ban them from entering the US.
@ yenta-fada:
yeah, but to me, that’s not the interesting part. Who shot him? Where’s the gun? Suicide mission?
eaglesoars wrote:
Parachute? It’s a James Bond world. It’s about money is my guess.
yenta-fada wrote:
never reached altitude. crashed shortly after take off. could have come from outside the chopper
and, of course, it could not be true.
eaglesoars wrote:
These days everyone is entitled to their own FACTS.
Somebody at zip’s place just nailed it
Christine 2-door Ford
bedtime nite
yenta-fada wrote:
That’s easy.
They are taken aside and given the LECTURE.
You know the one where you’re given the chance to join the ‘elite’ free from the cares of the world and with your ‘Get of Jail Card’ tucked into your wallet.
A friend of mine got the LECTURE whilst reading his LLD at Cambridge in the UK. He went on to become the NZ Minister of Defence and a leader of the so called National Party ( a centre Left bunch of grab as much as you can hold rapacious politicians). He left Parliament and has fallen into boards and other elitist ‘make work’ schemes that keep him in clover.
THAT is why seemingly normal folks suddenly go all ‘elitist’!
We were in the military together and he was probably the worst officer I have even seen. The joke was that the only reason his troops followed him was to watch him get into one ‘cock-up’ after another.
He actually told me to my face that the ‘plan’ was to reduce the world’s;ulation to 500 million by century’s end, with the world run by a small group of selected elitists with the balance being made up of technicians and robots running most of the production. He was a bit hazy about how we were going to get to that point by 2100.
🙂
Just for Cold and Eagles
The All Blacks up against the ‘olde enemy’s bloemfontein where the air is thin and the harpies are thick on the ground!
🙂
Just the highlights but Enjoy
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PnX_Xi2lXCQ
Good morning, here is just a little ammo to season your breakfast cereal.
JUSTICE Kavanaugh’s 4 – count ’em – FEMALE law clerks.
JUSTICE Kavanaugh has hired more black clerks during his SCOTUS tenure than RBG in her entire 25 years.
https://www.law.com/nationallawjournal/2018/10/07/meet-justice-kavanaughs-four-female-scotus-law-clerks/?cmp=share_twitter&slreturn=20180908074044
@ Aussie Infidel:
Thank you very much! Re: your ‘friend’ – I’m wondering if he was chosen because he’s stupid and malleable
ok, busy, bye
@ eaglesoars:
He’s just keeping minorities in their place and wants easy access to women he can rape.
//////////
eaglesoars wrote:
Bah… She’s obviously a Pinto…. One little bump in the rear, and she bursts into flames…
I love reporting on this.
The Michael Moore much-anticipated blockbuster “Fahrenheit 11/9” grossed a whopping estimated $220,000 this weekend and was dropped from over 1200 theaters after two weeks. I’ve yet to see what Mikey budgeted for this, but I’m thinking his total take from this isn’t going to pay the mortgage on that Park Avenue apartment for a year.
Blue wave? He couldn’t even get a blue wave in the theaters.
I didn’t get a chance to listen to Rush’s podcast on Friday until this a.m. Interesting. Apparently in Ford’s letter to Feinstein, Leland Keyser is referred to as “HE” not “SHE”. Supposedly the letter was written at Monica McLean’s house in Delaware.
Monica needs to be investigated. If she is still a federal employee and perpetrated a fraud upon the Senate, the FBI should have jurisdiction to undertake an investigation.
The Barbarian wrote:
she’s not. After Trump was elected, she retired and went into ‘consulting’
@ eaglesoars:
She’s in this up to her effing neck. I can FEEL it.
@ The Barbarian:
She was Preet Bharara’s girl in the FBI. Just sayin…
@ The Barbarian:
@ doriangrey:
what I find stunning is that she actually attended 2-Door’s hearing. She sat right behind her. Why do that? Why be public at all?
The mis-judgements of this team are breathtaking. Almost enough to make me think the whole thing is a false flag op
doriangrey wrote:
You mission,should you choose to accept, is to track down the veracity or lack thereof, of the ‘Deak’ person who is supposedly 2-Door’s grandfather and CIA. ‘Deak’ would be the surname.
Oh, and it looks like I was right about Avenutti crashing the party:
https://twitchy.com/samj-3930/2018/10/08/eating-their-own-senate-dems-attack-avenatti-for-hurting-their-case-against-kavanaugh-and-we-cant-stop-laughing/
eaglesoars wrote:
Nicholas Deak is NOT her grandfather. Deaks was probably her father’s “Ralph G. Blasey Jr” boss in the CIA prior to Deaks death.
I have video proof of Brett Kavanaugh attempting to rape Christine Pinto-Ford… Its devastating video…
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ngtALzDAIcU
eaglesoars wrote:
They just needed a compliant moron to mouth their platitudes on demand and to do as he was told. He has a doctorate in Constitutional law but literally can’t tie his own boot laces.
🙂
Here’s a little gossip for yinz: Hubby was ‘talking’ to the Susan Collins staffer he works with. She was fastidious. She went back to read that report 3 times, took what the staffer referred to as ‘copious’ notes, and wrote the speech entirely on her own. She delegated nothing.
eaglesoars wrote:
How about this> The deep state wants war with Russia. The whole Trump Russia collusion story line pokes the Russian bear as much as possible. They use a smear about sex since it works. All they needed was an insider with some high school connection possibility in Kavanaugh’s social circles. They find someone who needs/wants money
and can be duplicitous. They work with Feinstein promising that the whole thing won’t happen since Kavanaugh is too squeamish & clean to deal with the accusations and will back out immediately. Then, shit happens too quickly to train Blasey Ford properly. Feinstein is blindsided by someone leaking the letter. AND the circus comes to town.
http://theweek.com/speedreads/800702/brett-kavanaugh-just-hired-supreme-courts-first-allwomen-law-clerk-team
Smack.
@ coldwarrior:
I GOT THERE FIRST!!! (#89) AND – you missed the black chick part
@ yenta-fada:
For whatever reason I’ll stipulate the Deep State wants war with Russia(???)
What does Kavanaugh have to do with that?
break over, bbl
So,waiting on the girl, first practice, how rusty is she? Ended last year with a 282. I CALL 260. We’ll soon see.
oh dear
Explosion and fire at Canada’s largest oil refinery
https://www.yahoo.com/news/explosion-fire-canadas-largest-oil-refinery-media-154630879.html
@ eaglesoars:
Trump needs assistance from the Supreme Court in order to remove his main opponents. You don’t go into the jungle without the proper equipment to fight off the predators.
Don’t ask me to write the book. lol
Trump hosting Swearing-In for Kavanaugh.
yenta-fada wrote:
and this pic says it all
https://twitter.com/DroppedmicA/status/1049439777127374851
eaglesoars wrote:
Good One! You have really learned how to search on twitter.
@ yenta-fada:
nope, it was in my feed.
twitter has now suspended Judge Amy Coney Barrett. Not a joke.
I do like that Trump spoke directly to the Kavanaugh children ,”Your father is a great man.”
eaglesoars wrote:
Certainly not funny at all. Enemedia. See what happens when you search Google for ‘American Inventors’.
@ eaglesoars:
Ruth ‘Buzzi’ Ginsburg: Was that gas or did I just shit in my Depends…… Oh crap….. Shouldn’t of had that last shot of gin…
@ Bordm:
she was all bundled up -mittens, leggings, etc. She didn’t applaud w/everyone else and I don’t think it was pique, I think it may have actually hurt her hands.
yenta-fada wrote:
!!!!!
eaglesoars wrote:
she looks terrible.
that dowger’s hump will and is compressing the lungs not allowing full expansion. this WILL cause pneumonia.
Laura Loomer joins Faith Goldy trying to get into a Muslim event in Toronto. Sharia police in the form of a Chinese female cop escorts them out.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FPgKH_B62pM&feature=youtu.be
@ coldwarrior:
which is very sad.
I’ll leave you with some cool stuff, great video too
SpaceX Falcon 9 rocket makes first West Coast landing of orbital class rocket boosters
https://twitter.com/Reuters/status/1049496673582542848
nite
eaglesoars wrote:
I saw that from my driveway… Just sayin…
Nikki Haley has resigned
eaglesoars wrote:
YAWN….