► Show Top 10 Hot Links

Posts Tagged ‘KKK’

The Kluck Klams – The Ghost of Walt Kelly Speaks

by Bunk Five Hawks X ( 84 Comments › )
Filed under Art, Bigotry, Democratic Party, Free Speech, OOT, Open thread, Politics at August 17th, 2017 - 9:01 pm

[This is a repost from December 2014. Seems appropriate given the idiocy flying around the airwaves in recent days. –Bunk X]


Pogo” was penned by a famous anti-communist conservative cartoonist and his missive was directed at the Southern Democrats who created the KKK and enforced segregation via Jim Crow Laws. Walt Kelly was often censored by the liberal media newspapers for posting strips like these, so he published his uncensored opinions in “The Pogo Poop Book” in 1966.

We need more people like Walt Kelly to fight the latest “Gibber of Goblins,” and these New Goblins don’t wear white hoods either…

(more…)

Demo-KKK-Rat Mickey Kaus goes after Ted Cruz

by Phantom Ace Comments Off on Demo-KKK-Rat Mickey Kaus goes after Ted Cruz
Filed under Democratic Party, Headlines, Nazism, Progressives at September 21st, 2013 - 8:40 pm

The knives are out for Ted Cruz. The Know Nothing Wing of the GOP questions his American citizenship, the Establishment is smearing him and now the KKK remnant of the Democrat party led by Mickey Kaus goes after Ted Cruz. Mad that Cruz is going after Obamacare, Mickey now tries to turn Republicans against Ted by using the Immigration issue.

Hey, Look at Me Fail: Isn’t it obvious that Ted Cruz is in it for Ted Cruz? The man had a choice–he could fight the’ Senate’s push for “amnesty first” immigration legislation, which he had a very good chance of killing, or he could stage a showy fight against funding Obamacare that he’d certainly lose. The first course would annoy the business backers who fund Senate and presidential campaigns. The latter course would gin up and channel conservative anger, boosting Cruz’s profile in the caucuses and primaries,without doing anyone much damage at all (since it would fail). The choice seems to have been a no-brainer for the senator.

I originally thought Cruz opposed amnesty and took a dive on the issue, doing the minimum possible to maintain his credibility. I now don’t think his behavior was that bad. It was worse–his very opposition to amnesty was fake. Evidence: The New York Times, in a bit of Anticipatory Strange New Respect, recently ran a piece on Cruz’s attempt to stake out “middle ground on immigration.” The middle ground seems to be support for legalization that stops short of citizenship:

“A path to legal status, but not to citizenship. A green card with no right to naturalization.

Cruz’s position on immigration is what a majority of Republicans have, which is after the border is secure, Visa entrants tracked and Penalties for business who hire illegals, a legalization process for the illegals here. Mickey Kaus being a good KKK Democrat wants to destroy Cruz’s political career because he’s Hispanic. I hope Republicans do not allow themselves to be manipulted by an Obama supporting Democrat. Even if you don’t agree with Ted Cruz’z position on Immigration, is One issue really enough to destroy someone you disagree on everything else. Remember Mickey Kaus is a KKK Democrat and should be shunned by the Right.

 

The racist nature of the Progressive movement

by Phantom Ace ( 50 Comments › )
Filed under Multiculturalism, Nazism, Progressives, Socialism at November 14th, 2011 - 11:30 am

Racism is at the heart of Progressivsism. At it’s core the Progressive ideology believes in the supremacy of Northwest Europeans. Slavs, Jews, Mideast Christians, Africans, Indians, Asians, Polynesians, Southern Europeans and their Latin American offspring are all deemed inferior. The most notorious manifestation of Progressive racism was the National Socialist German Workers Party in Germany. However, this Progressive racism has reared its ugly head in America as well. What is not well known is that Jim Crow laws were promoted by the Progressive movement of the late 19th Century. The American Progressives believed in promoting Eugenics to eliminate the undesirable people. In fact, the German Progressives (Nazis) were influenced by their American ideological cousins!

In 1865, amid the final throes of the Civil War, Frederick Douglass worried that the prospect of fulfilling the promise of the Declaration of Independence, by finally securing to blacks “the most perfect civil and political equality,” would founder on the allure of policies that in crucial respects restricted their natural rights — e.g., the rights to acquire property and vote. Such policies, though intended to “prepare them to better handle freedom,” would “practically enslave . . . the Negro, and make . . . the [Emancipation] Proclamation of 1863 a mockery and delusion. What is freedom? It is the right to choose one’s own employment. Certainly it means that, if it means anything; and when any[one] undertakes to decide for any man when he shall work, where he shall work, at what he shall work, and for what he shall work, he or they practically reduce him to slavery.” The right to vote was even more important, because it was the main means for blacks to protect all their other natural rights. “Without this,” Douglass stressed, the black man “is the slave of society, and holds his liberty as a privilege, not as a right.”

Douglass’s concern was prophetic. Although the United States took significant steps toward “the most perfect civil and political equality” for blacks by adding the 13th, 14th, and 15th Amendments to the Constitution, these gains were short-lived. Beginning in 1890, a wave of disfranchisement swept through Dixie, as every southern state enacted literacy tests, poll taxes, and other restrictions making it virtually impossible for black men to vote. The impact of these restrictions, historian C. Vann Woodward suggests, is well indicated by Louisiana’s experience: In 1896 there were 130,334 blacks registered to vote; by 1904, there were only 1,342. The disfranchisement of blacks was accompanied, he continues, by “the mushroom growth of discriminatory and segregation laws,” intrusively dictating a thoroughgoing separation of the races in transportation, the workplace, hospitals, mental and penal institutions, recreational facilities, voluntary associations, etc. Two states even forbade the members of fraternal societies to address fellow members of another race as “brother.”

At first glance, this might seem odd. Just when post-Reconstruction America appeared poised to fulfill the promise of the Declaration by bringing the law into fuller accord with the equal, natural rights of man, the law became sharply more racial in character, actually rolling back recent gains and adding a host of new restrictions. Scholars frequently attribute this about-face to a resurgence of southern prejudice. The interesting fact that “the high tide of progressive reform coincided with some of the darkest moments of segregation, discrimination, and racial violence,” as historian Axel Schafer puts it, would seem to have been just that — mere coincidence. A classic instance, apparently, of correlation without causation. 

But this was no coincidence. “In the South,” Woodward observes, “the typical progressive reformer rode to power . . . on a disfranchising or white-supremacy movement.” The very same reformers who championed minimum wages, maximum hours, social insurance, and other labor reforms not only generally opposed extending the suffrage to blacks, but also promoted a “policy of segregation” for blacks and various “degenerates,” including the feeble-minded, epileptics, and “unemployables.” And they did so not in spite of the principles animating their economic reforms, but precisely because of them. The progressives’ support for disfranchisement and segregation, in other words, was but one practical expression of their philosophically inspired drive to revolutionize the moral basis of American government — to redefine the very meaning of human freedom and the rights to which individuals are, as a consequence, entitled.

Read the rest: Progressivism, Race, and the Training Wheels of Freedom

The Progressive movement has created a racial caste system. Anyone who refuses to play the role assigned them is smeared and attacked. Progressives are racists and it’s time to call them out on it. Look at the recent smears against Herman Cain and Marco Rubio. The anti-semitism shown to Jewish Conservatives is another example of Progressive racism.

Progressivism in all of its manifestations is evil.

Conservatives should turn the tables on Progressive race baiting

by Phantom Ace ( 165 Comments › )
Filed under Barack Obama, Democratic Party, Progressives, Republican Party, Tea Parties at September 2nd, 2011 - 8:30 am


Navy Seal Foundation Charity… Gun Raffle Tickets!

Great prize! Great cause!



I’m getting sick of the Democrats and their race games. The Party of the KKK is still using its old tricks. This time the modern incarnation of the Klan is using Black Kapos to do their dirty work. The Congressional Black Caucus is engaging in nasty racial demagogue language. Rep. Andre Carson( D-Ind) is accusing the Tea Party of wanting blacks lynched. He also claims that Conservatives want to see blacks as 2nd class citizens. This is part of an earlier report that the Obama regime plans to use the race card to win re-election in 2012. The CBC’s recent rhetoric is just the opening salvo in this tactic.

Those race-baiting Democrats are at it again. This time, the race baiting comes from some members of the Congressional Black Caucus. Perhaps, at this point, Examiner readers might take what I say next with a huge grain of salt. I’m not exactly unbiased when it comes to the group known as the CBC.

What do I think of the CBC? The truth is I try not to think about the CBC. I find that I’m a kinder, gentler, happier person when I don’t think about the CBC. But what I do think of them can be summed up in one sentence: The late Rep. Adam Clayton Powell did more, single-handedly, than the CBC has ever done as a group.

[…]

Rep. Maxine Waters, D-Calif., obviously determined not to be outdone, went Carson one better. She didn’t resort to race baiting, to her credit. Waters had this to say about members of the Tea Party movement: “As far as I’m concerned, the Tea Party can go straight to hell.”

Read the rest: Would Democrats please drop the race baiting?

This tactic by the Democrats is ridiculous and Republicans should call them on it. Conservatives should get Black Republicans like Allen West and Tim Scott to go out there and point out that the CBC has done nothing for Black Americans. Most of them are entrenched incumbents and nothing has improved in their districts. In fact under Obama, Black Americans economic situation has deteriorated. Get Black Conservatives to call The CBC House Negroes, Oreos, Overseers and race traitors. Use the Left’s language back at them. Conservatives need to stop whining and start fighting.

Thanks to the 2010 elections, the GOP is a very diversified party. They should use this diversity to turn the tables and beat the Democrats at the race game. Call White Democrats who criticize “Non White” Republicans racists. Claim that it is because of Democratic racist policies that blacks have it bad economically. Just accuse Democrats of being racists and paint the CBC as racial lackeys who carry out the bidding of their White Progressive masters. Ridicule and marginalize the Congressional Black Caucus as race traitors.

It’s disgusting what the Democrats and the CBC are doing with their rhetoric. Instead of whining and complaining, Conservatives should beat them at their own race game.  The Right should also push a common American national identity regardless of one’s biological or cultural background. This is something Conservatives are not doing. As to why this is, well that will be the subject of another post. Hint: Globalist thinking and Internationalism.



Navy Seal Foundation Charity… Gun Raffle Tickets!

Great prize! Great cause!