First time visitor? Learn more.

Gus802 says Pfc. Naser Abdo was Secular

by Phantom Ace ( 28 Comments › )
Filed under Al Qaeda, Blogwars, Dhimmitude, Diary of Daedalus, Islam, Islamic Supremacism, Islamic Terrorism, Islamists, Leftist-Islamic Alliance, LGF, Special Report at July 28th, 2011 - 6:24 pm

America hating Far Left Argentine Gus802 continues to make a fool of himself. After trashing the Norwegian shooter as a Christian militant despite the evidence he was motivated by Norwegian Nationalism, he makes excuses for Pfc. Naser Abdo. He claims that Abdo had no religious motivation in his planned attack.

AL-Qaeda is not fighting for Islam? Can you explain the Caliphate Gus802? You claim people on the right make excuses for the Norway shooting, yet you make excuses for AL-Qaeda and Pfc. Naser Abdo. Well let’s see  what Abdo’s motivations are!

“Islam is a peaceful religion, it’s not a religion of warfare,” Abdo said. “And it’s not a religion of terror. As a Muslim, we stand against injustice, we stand against discrimination, and I feel it’s my duty as an individual to do this.”

So he wasn’t motivated by Islam Gus?

KILLEEN, Texas (AP) — An AWOL soldier who had weapons stashed in a motel room near Fort Hood has admitted to planning an attack on the Texas post, where 13 people died in 2009 in the worst mass shooting ever on a U.S. military installation, the Army said in an alert issued Thursday.

Pfc. Naser Abdo, a 21-year-old soldier who was granted conscientious objector status this year after he said his Muslim beliefs prevented him from fighting, was arrested Wednesday. Agents found firearms and “items that could be identified as bomb-making components, including gunpowder,” in his motel room, according to FBI spokesman Erik Vasys.

Read the rest: Army: AWOL soldier admits to Fort Hood attack plan

Gus802 is a dishonest America hater.

As of this writing, Charles Johnson has not mention this attempted attack.

Tags: , , ,

Comments

Comments and respectful debate are both welcome and encouraged.

Comments are the sole opinion of the comment writer, just as each thread posted is the sole opinion or post idea of the administrator that posted it or of the readers that have written guest posts for the Blogmocracy.

Obscene, abusive, or annoying remarks may be deleted or moved to spam for admin review, but the fact that particular comments remain on the site in no way constitutes an endorsement of their content by any other commenter or the admins of this Blogmocracy.

We're not easily offended and don't want people to think they have to walk on eggshells around here (like at another place that shall remain nameless) but of course, there is a limit to everything.

Play nice!

Comments are closed.

Back to the Top

The Blogmocracy

website design was Built By All of Us