► Show Top 10 Hot Links

Archive for July, 2011

Our Founding Documents Under Siege.

by Flyovercountry ( 168 Comments › )
Filed under Politics, Progressives at July 6th, 2011 - 11:30 am

First, have a good laugh with me. This is from ABC’s Sunday Morning Show, and this is what is passing for intelligent debate from the left side these days.

Just a few thoughts. The authors of the Constitution were not interested in predicting the future. No, they did not know about telephones, better and more effective weapons such as drones or assault rifles, or even jet air travel. This matters not as to how the constitution should be interpreted. The Constitution provides the framework of our government, and how best to limit the scope of that government and keep it accountable to the people. Taken in that context, and reading what the framers of our beginning had to actually say on these very subjects, (we after all are not having this argument with the left in a vacuum, as those authors of this extraordinary document did tell us all what they meant,) the only possible argument the leftist panel has is that the Constitution does not say what they want it to say. It does not give an elite ruling class carte Blanche to inflict their vision of a Worker’s Paradise upon us whether we want it or not. Not a single person on this panel of Braniacs was able to answer Will’s question about whether the commerce clause would not be interpreted to mean that there was now, in effect, not a single check on the power of congress to do whatever congress wanted to do. Ie. does Congress literally now have limitless power under the current interpretation of the commerce clause. Bear in mind, that according to Hamilton, the commerce clause was only intended to insure that the various states would not be able to coin and mint their own currency and use the various currencies to inflict hidden taxes upon each other. Notice also, that was the very last Will was to be included in the discussion. It just won’t do to have the token conservative speak once he has embarrassed the remainder of the panel with a coherent thought. The remainder of the clip is pretty much the same kind of argument stated in various ways. The founding fathers had no way of knowing how much smarter than the rest of us the progressives of today would be, so therefore they would have welcomed the creation of a ruling elite class, blah, blah, blah. This little bit of drama in which the faux intellectuals discuss how outdated and impractical our founding document is was perfectly timed to coincide with Time’s little front page gem in which the managing editor of Time, Richard Stengel, used his heavyweight magazine’s power to advocate that we as a nation should just scrap that pesky constitution thing anyway.

This weekend, also in time for the fourth, a day in which we celebrate our Declaration of Independence, someone pointed this out to me. it comes to us from Think Progress, a Soros funded outfit.  In case you are not aware of who George Soros is, he is the owner of the Democrat Party.  a few fun snippets from their argument that our split from English rule was actually an event owned by all of the good people who live on mother Gaya’s Earth.

When, in the course of human events, it becomes necessary for one people to dissolve the political bonds which have connected them with another, and to assume among the powers of the earth, the separate and equal station to which the laws of Nature and of Nature’s God entitle them,a decent respect to the opinions of mankindrequires that they should declare the causes which impel them to the separation.

So now, according to Think Progress, we need the world’s approval, and the approval of Nature itself to have our little nation here.

We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable rights, that among these are life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness.

That sounds familiar.  O.K., I can live with that.  But what do the newly added lines mean anyhow?  Glad you’ve asked.

By saying that it is a self-evident truth that all humans are created equal and that our inalienable rights include life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness, our Founding Fathers were telling us that we are all in this together, that we are interdependent, that we have a moral duty to protect these inalienable rights for all humans. President Lincoln, perhaps above all others, was instrumental in making clear that the second sentence of the Declaration was “a moral standard for which the United States should strive,” as Wikipedia puts it.
It is the laws of Nature, studied and enumerated by scientists, that make clear we are poised to render those unalienable rights all but unattainable for billions of humans on our current path of unrestricted greenhouse gas emissions. It is the laws of Nature that make clear Americans can’t achieve sustainable prosperity if the rest of the world doesn’t, and vice versa.

O.K., now we’re cooking.  What this means, is that even if our economic and political system have allowed us to enjoy the greatest success the world has ever seen in terms of creating wealth and improving the living standard of every one of our citizens.  Even though our poor enjoy a better living standard of anyone in the third world who would be considered middle or in some instances upper class, we have no right to enjoy that success until the remainder of the world will be able to match that standard.  In order to have the remainder of the world match our standard by allowing their citizens the same freedoms and free market systems which we enjoy, we should make this happen by destroying our own economy.

Hat tip Lobo91

Cross Posted at Musings of a Mad Conservative.

Gov. Rick Perry: The Candidate Obama Would Fear the Most

by huckfunn ( 9 Comments › )
Filed under Barack Obama, Economy, Elections 2012, government, Headlines, Politics, Progressives, Regulation, Republican Party, unemployment at July 6th, 2011 - 9:47 am

 

This article makes all of the right points as to why Governor Rick Perry of Texas would be the candidate most feared by Obama. Perry is the anti-Obama. Obama whines about the the economy  he inherited when he took office and continues to blame Bush for every conceivable problem he faces. By contrast, Perry stands on an 11 year record of job growth and expanding tax base due to plentiful migration to Texas. And remember, Rick Perry also inherited an economy from George Bush. However, he didn’t muck it up by forcing higher taxes and burdensome regulation on business.

Obama’s Record

Energy:  Gasoline was $1.67 a gallon then.  It’s now $3.79.

Food:  Average cost of a gallon of milk was about $2.65.  It’s about $3.50 today.

Housing:  The median cost of a home was $229,600.  Today it’s $217,900.

Budget deficit:  We fell $438 billion short of balancing the federal budget in 2008.  We missed it by $1.4 trillion this year—nearly four times higher.

U.S. debt:  Total federal debt was $10.7 trillion then. It’s $14.5 trillion now—nearly 50% higher.

Unemployment:  Then, 7.3% of Americans were unemployed and 9.1% are unemployed today.

Perry’s Record

A recent state-by-state comparison study by the Texas Public Policy Foundation found that Texas had a state tax burden of 8.4%, compared to a U.S. average of 9.7%.  And the Texas gross state product grew 94.5% over 10 years, vs. 66.3% for the rest of the country.

Texas far outpaces other states in job creation.  Michael Cox and Richard Alm, director and writer-in-residence, respectively, at Southern Methodist University’s William J. O’Neil Center for Global Markets and Freedom write:  “From January 2000 to June 2010 [Perry’s tenure], Texas had a net increase of nearly 1.1 million jobs—more than any other state by far.  In fact, Texas’ outsized gains eclipsed the total of the next five job-creating states: Florida, Arizona, Virginia, Utah and Washington.”

More importantly, the Bureau of Labor Statistics reported that Texas created 129,000 new jobs in 2009—a recession year.  That was more than half of all the jobs created in the country.

The Brookings Institution published a study earlier this year looking at job growth in major cities.  Texas had five of the top 10 cities, with Austin leading the country in job growth.

Read the whole thing here.

 

NYC Garbage Men Can Write Tickets???

by coldwarrior ( 34 Comments › )
Filed under government, Progressives, Special Report at July 6th, 2011 - 9:03 am

Hat tip Citizen Q.

Yes, i said ‘garbage man’. I don’t play the rename the job to make it sound more important -gender neutral-Human Resources crap…so sue me.

Anyway, this is what goes on IN NYC? Once proud New Yorkers put up with municipal employees with police powers?  Man. Nanny Bloomberg must have put something in the water to brainwash everyone in the 5 boroughs.  Citizens of NYC put up with this??? Has the city fallen that far in the past 10 years? I can’t imagine what would happen if the garbageman tried to write a ticket out here…

I used to live in West Berlin and traveled extensively through the East. In the DDR, the garbage man, the postman, and everyone else were used by the state to keep a boot on the necks of the people through spying and reports to the VoPo. When I read this article all I could think of was the spying mailman in the DDR, working for the state, turning in his neighbors for a pat on the head from his superior and to buy another day on the good side of the party.

I haven’t been to NYC since Rudy was mayor. That is probably a good thing. You cats in the 4 other boroughs need to take back your city.  I can assure you that if this happened out here where we peons live, the town council meetings would be over run with masses of very angry bergers.

The police should be the only ones writing tickets, they are sworn officers of the law and are trained to do this task.

What next, the chefs and waiters writing tickets if you eat too much salt?

NEW YORK (CBSNewYork) An elderly Upper East Side woman claims a sanitation agent chased her, threatened her with arrest and slapped her with a ticket for putting day-old newspapers in a city trash can.

Darbe Pitofsky, 83, said she was on her way for a cup of coffee around 6:30 a.m. on June 25 when she threw a brown bag filled with old papers in a city litter basket near her apartment on East 71st Street.

She said a sanitation worker quickly jumped out of his vehicle and demanded her information to write a summons.

 

“I froze,” Pitofsky told 1010 WINS’ Carol D’Auria. “He just frightened the hell out of me, scared me to death, I was terrified.”

She said the worker demanded a form of identification and threatened to “put her away” if she didn’t comply.

Pitofsky said it took the worker 25 minutes to write the summons and when she complained that it would cost her $100,  she said he threatened to make it $300.

A representative for the Sanitation Department said street baskets are for pedestrian use only but added Pitofsky can challenge the ticket if she thinks there has been a mistake.

Litter baskets across the city are marked with stickers that read “no household trash” or “no business trash,” along with a warning of a $100 fine for violation. The Sanitation Department has a platoon of enforcement agents tasked with enforcing litter basket laws. Their duties even include doing detective work on trash suspected of being illegally dumped.

Pitofsky said she has already filed a complaint.

Her story is similar to that of 80-year-old Delia Gluckin, who last December, was also fined $100 for “improper disposal” for throwing her newspaper in a trash can in Inwood.

Shoplift Nation

by Mojambo ( 81 Comments › )
Filed under Crime at July 6th, 2011 - 8:30 am

I was always fascinated by the phenomena of middle and upper class people who can afford  the things they want, who felt the compulsion to shop lift. I guess it is the whole allure of the idea of getting something for nothing  while “getting over on the man” is  to blame.

by Susannah Callahan

Ten percent of Americans do it, retailers pretend it doesn’t exist and companies spend billions to stop it. And because of the retail world’s dirty little secret — shoplifting — the average American spends $423 more a year on crime-taxed products.

Last year alone, the retail industry lost $37.14 billion due to shrinkage (inventory loss), up from $33.5 billion in 2008, according to the 2010 National Retail Federation’s security survey. That amounts to about $101 million lost a day, or $4.2 million per hour. Shrinkage accounted for 1.56% of retail sales — most businesses can’t turn a profit with a shrinkage rate higher than 2%.

Still, shoplifting is still largely trivialized, viewed as a harmless, non-violent, victimless crime. Thefts go under-reported, often downgraded from a felony to a misdemeanor, and under-arrested. Most retailers remain mum about it, fearing for their reputations and bottom lines, says Rachel Shteir, author of “The Steal,” a new book about the history of shoplifting.

Twenty-seven million Americans are shoplifters, according to the National Association for Shoplifting Prevention; yet, stores only catch shoplifters one in 48 times, and inform the police only one out of every 50 caught.

It’s the only crime of which both men and women are equally guilty. Most shoplifters steal for want, not need. Razors are the most common item stolen worldwide. The Bible is one of the most widely stolen books.

Despite the incessant suck on our economy, we know very little about the phenomenon. To understand — and to properly combat it — Shteir says there must be transparency, perhaps a bit of shame. “Maybe in the future, stores will make public the details of how they deal with shoplifters, just as governments are publishing their secrets. But thus far, no Julian Assange has appeared to reveal the secrets of Bergdorf’s,” Shteir says.

Instead, “the silent epidemic grows in a medium of silence.”

Shoplifting has evolved with shopping itself. The first department stores of the 19th century were designed without security in mind — the best products placed with open, aesthetically pleasing design and multiple exits and entrances.

But by the 1960s, when “sticky fingers” and “five-finger discount” were coined, America experienced its largest ever spike in shoplifting. Incidents rose more than 150% between 1960 and 1970, with 93% more arrests.

Stores responded swiftly, adding large aisles that made it easier to spot crooks, placing the best merchandise deep inside the store and cordoning off only two or three closely manned exits. Stores hired off-duty cops, called floorwalkers, installed pinhole cameras inside the eyes of mannequins and hired detectives to sit on observation perches or hollowed out pillars.

Still, shoplifting continued to rise.

In the late ’60s, stores started adorning clothes with security tags, using radio-wave and microwave frequency. Macy’s, one of the security-tag company’s first clients, only installed tags on furs, waiting years before applying them to other departments. Saks Fifth Avenue and Neiman Marcus still often don’t use sensors.

But, like any cat-and-mouse game, shoplifters adapted. Booster bags, aprons, bras, harnesses, coats, even bloomers lined with metal to deflect the security technology have become common. Shteir writes about booster pregnancies — where women stuff their underwear with goods to make it appear like a swollen belly.

Retail fraud is a far more damaging type of shoplifting, and more difficult to catch. In this scenario, a shoplifter will go to return an item in the store using an earlier receipt. Sometimes stores offer credit; others give cash.

Employees are the most common perpetrators. Of the $37.14 billion shrinkage last year, employee theft accounted for $16.2 billion, nearly half of the losses. But some experts say that it’s easier to arrest and prosecute an employee than a casual shopper, so the numbers are inflated.

Forty-six percent of retailers have increased their security budgets in 2010, according to the NRF survey. Now more advanced systems are in the works. One is a motion-sensor device that can distinguish if a customer moves like a shoplifter and alerts store employees. Another is a radio-frequency surveillance chip that can track any object from the store even to a person’s home.

The department store was invented in New York, and shoplifting, too, was honed here.

New York is among the top 10 most shoplifted cities in the country and the NYPD has a designated task force to deal with it. During Mayor Bloomberg’s tenure, petit larceny, a charge against many shoplifters, has jumped from 13,826 in 2002 to more than 35,849 in 2010. The felony threshold here for shoplifting is $1,000 — anything less is a misdemeanor. If the shoplifter is caught with a booster bag, charges are enhanced to burglary.

Still, local retailers are attractive targets for ’lifters.

[……]
The most bizarre aspect to shoplifting is the complete lack of a criminal profile.

Although long considered a female crime, men have caught up in the past 30 years. Now, both men and women shoplift in roughly equal numbers. Criminologists say that men often resell items, while women keep the items to enhance their home, families or appearance.

Income isn’t even a factor. A study titled “Who Actually Steals” says that a common shoplifter is a primary household shopper who usually has gainful employment and steals to stretch the budget.

Americans with incomes of $70,000 shoplift 30% more than those earning up to $20,000 a year, according to a study conducted by the American Journal of Psychology in 2008. “Having some money arouses desire to steal more than having little,” Shteir says. “It shows you that people steal more out of desire than need.”

In 1966, actress Hedy Lamarr was the first celebrity to stand trial for shoplifting in America, for stealing a $40 knit suit, $1 worth of greeting cards, $10 bikini underwear and an eye makeup brush at Mays Department store in Los Angeles.

Actress Winona Ryder made headlines when she was caught red-handed at Saks Fifth Avenue in Beverly Hills; former White House aide Claude Allen was arrested for return fraud at a Maryland Target; and Rudy Giuliani’s daughter, Caroline, was arrested for stealing $100 worth of beauty items at Sephora in New York last year.

Dean Martin even admitted to shoplifting in an interview with the Evening Post: “Even today . . . I steal a necktie or a pair of gloves or a pair of socks,” he said.

Age also is not a determinant. Although 40% of teens admit to shoplifting, many criminologists believe that teenagers are over-represented in studies. Among the elderly, shoplifting is the most common crime, experts say. One senior invention program in Florida, which helps the elderly navigate the legal system, said that 75% of their clients shoplifted.

[……..]

Read the rest – Klepto Nation