► Show Top 10 Hot Links

Archive for July, 2011

Why Even Have A Debt Limit?

by Flyovercountry ( 108 Comments › )
Filed under Economy at July 5th, 2011 - 11:00 am

A reader asked me to write about the debt ceiling again.  I will admit to a sinking feeling, like I really did not want to do it.  Not only because I already have, and half of the bloggers on the internet have, and not only because it has been a topic of debate on every news format T.V. and radio program, and not only because any politician who knows how to find a bank of microphones and cameras has found a way to chime in on this, complete non issue, but because the topic is like watching a train wreck.  I live in north east Ohio, somewhat close to Bellevue.  For those of you who do not know, Bellevue, Ohio is the largest rail switch yard in the country, maybe even the world.  Trains are very heavy critters.  Momentum for those who skipped science class is calculated my multiplying mass by velocity.  Anyone who has ever been in an auto accident can tell you about momentum.  Sometimes, when a train wreck is about to occur, people might know for 15 minutes prior, and still be unable to do a damn thing about it.  A bad decision might put two opposite bound trains on the same track, and momentum does the rest.  But, like our might example the train, I will allow my momentum to make a few logical observations.

Why do we have a debt limit?  We have drawn this imaginary line in the stratosphere and exclaimed that we would make it illegal for ourselves to take on any more debt than that.  So, as we approach it, naturally we raise the limit.  It has gotten to the point now that we are talking about the next increase even before we max out our current so called limit.  So, why do we have one?  Why play this sadistic game with ourselves?  Why not just admit that we are going to keep borrowing money, just like Greece, until our creditors cut us off?  Really, what is the bloody point?

Why get mad at China?  For those who have not heard me state this before, let me make it clear.  China has only done what we, as a nation, asked them to do.  Yes, China holds 30% of our debt, and that situation is bad in so many ways.  China is hardly a friendly nation, and they delight in using North Korea and their tin pot little dictator as a thorn in our side.  China is a trade partner who views us as an economic enemy to be vanquished, and with time, China will learn the benefit of a free economic system complete with full property rights, but for now, they are still overrun by former communists.  Don’t confuse that however with the real issue of them holding our debt, the fault for that catastrophe is strictly ours.  We went to them and asked them to loan us the money, not the other way around.

I read a particularly depressing poll today which stated that Americans are for balancing the budget, but not if it means we need to cut entitlement spending.  When did we stop teaching basic math in our public schools?  Really, I know a lot of teachers, and I truly like them all.  I think the world of them, but if a majority of Americans believe we can balance the budget without taking a very huge machete to the area of spending known as entitlements, then all I can say is that collectively, every school teacher in the country has failed to educate the American Public at large.  67% of what our government spends is spent as a matter of law, and falls under the realm of entitlements.  40% of what our government spends is borrowed money.  If every penny of non entitlement spending were to end tomorrow, we would still be borrowing 10.4% of every dollar spent.  That means, if we shut down the post office, fired everyone in the military and said no more national defense, closed the EPA, fired the FBI, stopped the Department of Education, Labor, HHS, Interior, Treasury, Interior, etc……, we would still be $260 Billion short of running a balanced budget.

We have grown the economy out of these problems in the past, so why do the Democrats in charge of things now feel that it is their solemn duty to destroy any potential for economic growth.  Why are they claiming that the Republicans, who by the way control no part of anything, and haven’t for years, are sabotaging the economy.  Why does anyone able to form a thought fall for this.  Boeing, a major U.S. corporation tried their level best to employ thousands in South Carolina, which would have led to a multiplier effect that would have been a tremendous boon to the Democrats politically in the 2012 elections.  When Barack Obama gave his speech about job creation, and turning the economy around, it could have been true.  Our old friend hyper regulation reared its ugly head and put the stopper on that.  Here’s the thing, I would rather see my friends and  neighbors working and prospering than to have President Obama preside over a terrible economy.

Yesterday, Barack Obama gave a tongue lashing to the House Leadership, which is Republican, about leading on the budget, and solving our economic woes.  Then he jetted off for another round of golf and more vacation time.  Leadership is important, but it starts with a President, and then it filters down to the legislators. So, where is Obama’s budget?  He has yet to offer one as President.  This is his third year in office, and his homework is now about 2 and 1/2 years late.  Come to think of it, for the entire time the Democrats controlled the House, they failed to prepare a single budget.  This is the ultimate in shirking responsibility.  The President’s tongue lashings have become a joke, and deservedly so.

I consider myself a conservative first, and probably identify with Republicans more than Democrats.  I know that this shocks no one, but I do have some instances of when the GOP angers me as well.  Mostly it happens when they capitulate in the ideals they promised to uphold but did not.  I sent John Boehner a few letters stating I wanted no compromising going on.  Yet, when I turn on the T.V. there is some Republican who is saying, “I think the voters sent us here to get along and to iron out our differences and to work out a compromise to move the country forward.”  What on Earth do we have to do to these dolts to let them know we sent them to Washington as a restraining order against the asinine profligate spending going on.

Here is the train wreck about to happen.  Our own ideas for our debt limit as we should have noticed by now is completely meaningless.  It is an imaginary number that when we get close to it, it just gets bigger.  The debt limit that is not meaningless is that which is imposed by our creditors.  One such creditor, PIMCO has announced, a few months back that they are indeed refusing to loan us another dime.  No, they are not our biggest creditor, but in my experience, creditors tend to have very similar outlooks.  Standard and Poors, Fitch, Moody’s, Credit Suisse, have all downgraded our bond ratings.  This means that the people who rate our ability to pay back loans is now out there telling our creditors, and their risk committees that we aren’t as capable of paying back our loans as we would like everyone to believe.  What will happen when the rest of the world refuses to loan us another dime, well my friends, we will finally get the balanced budget amendment I’ve always wanted.  The two trains on the track are our massive spending, and the massive borrowing we must do in order to keep that spending going.  These trains are too massive to stop, and so they are going to crash.  The only question now, is whether or not we wish to apply the brakes to soften the blow.

Hat tip Rodan.

Cross Posted at Musings of a Mad Conservative.

Business owners in New York City are ill over ObamaCare

by Mojambo ( 94 Comments › )
Filed under Healthcare, unemployment at July 5th, 2011 - 8:30 am

ObamaCare is going to one of the biggest deterrents to job growth ever as small businesses are just not going to be hiring full time workers because of the excessive costs associated with. I guess if you are a big corporation that contributes to The One’s campaign you can always get a waiver. As the article states – it may be worthwhile paying the $2,000 fine.

by John Aidan Byrne

Rohit Arora runs a small business credit service. His firm provides the much-needed capital for companies to grow, expand and to hire.

So when Arora, the CEO of Biz2Credit, a Midtown finance company, says his latest research shows businesses large and small are making every effort to avoid hiring full-time workers, Washington should take notice.

The reason, Arora says, is because of rising health-care costs and fears about ObamaCare, the red tape and paperwork. He is also practicing what he hears with his own firm.

“ObamaCare has cast a long shadow over my plans to hire more staff,” Arora said.

Employers across the metro area have had to put off hiring workers. They blame spiraling health-care costs and the uncertain future price tag of ObamaCare.

Another owner, Frank Passantino, is furious. “We have approximately 20 employees, and we have held off on hiring because we do not know what’s going to happen with the law,” said Passantino, president of Printech Business System on 35th Street in Midtown. “It’s very definitely scary.”

Passantino thinks he could incur higher health-care costs if he expands his payroll today. “That could be devastating.”

As drafted, ObamaCare is suppose to allow small businesses with 50 workers or fewer from having to provide their health insurance.

But Passantino doesn’t buy it. “You just don’t know, they may change the ruling,” he said. Paul Levine, vice president of finance at Powersmith Home Energy Solutions in Bay Shore, Long Island, said this kind of uncertainly doesn’t help any business.

Small to mid-size businesses, which generate close to 70 percent of US jobs, fear ObamaCare could bury them in colossal bills and future paperwork, and are now paying the price as premiums have soared in anticipation of the new regulation.

“ObamaCare has been very negative for our business,” Moishe Heimowitz, principal at First Medcare, a 50-employee medical practice based in Canarsie, told The Post. “The high costs of ObamaCare and our present health-care costs have impeded our efforts to hire more people.”

Heimowitz says his company’s health insurance plans have skyrocketed in price. His outlay has jumped by 50 percent on average in the past 12 months — monthly increases of $200 for single employees, $350 per couples and a perplexing $1,000 for family plans.

Said Levine: “All I know is, my health-care premiums for employees this year went up by 19 percent, which is fairly steep.”

Martin Stevens, CEO of Forum Publishing in Centerport, Long Island, knows the feeling. His assessment of ObamaCare: a “big disappointment.”

He says ObamaCare is preventing him from expanding his full-time payroll of 12 people. “It’s impacting our bottom line,” said Stevens.

As the statewide unemployment rate is stuck at 7.9 percent — and 8.6 percent in the five boroughs — these businesses have the means and desire to hire, but not the will because of the unknown costs and regulations.

This brouhaha is happening against a backdrop of 12 consecutive dismal weeks of initial jobless claims above the 400,000 mark.

It’s evidence, say the business experts, of a damaging local and national employment malaise.

Companies large and small — many hoarding serious cash on their balance sheets — are reluctant to hire workers as long as the cloud of ObamaCare hangs about, they say.

Other costs associated with ObamaCare are pumping up costly new premiums, according to Michael Tanner, an expert at the Cato Institute who has extensively studied ObamaCare.

Cases in point: Children can now remain on their parents’ insurance plans until they’re 26, and lifetime caps are prohibited on insurance benefits.

The increases in premiums could also be the insurance companies loading up early, anticipating future restrictions on how much they charge because of ObamaCare, according to Tanner.

That’s even though President Obama once vowed that health-care reform would “bend the cost curve down.”

There’s no sign of that. Tanner contends that ObamaCare will cost the nation $2.7 trillion in its first 10 years. It will expand the national debt by $823 billion, he says.

That, Tanner notes, does not take into account this astonishing sum: More than $4.3 trillion in costs will be transferred to businesses, individuals and state governments under ObamaCare. And over its first 10 years, the law adds more than $569 billion in new or increased taxes.

Heimowitz makes the ObamaCare cutoff with his 50 employees at First MedCare. But it doesn’t matter to him. “The thing is, if I don’t offer health insurance, I won’t attract good staff and professional staff,” he said, anxiously weighing his potential future liabilities.

Some will take the option of paying a fine of $2,000 per worker instead of insuring them. Analysts think many will do just that. Not surprisingly, a new McKinsey & Company study estimates that 78 million Americans will lose their current coverage. That defeats the ObamaCare’s goal of universal health-care coverage, analysts say.

[…..]

Read the rest – NYC business owners sick over ObamaCare

Auto Puke

by Bunk Five Hawks X ( 64 Comments › )
Filed under Blogmocracy, Open thread at July 4th, 2011 - 11:00 pm


[via]
It’s not the heat, it’s the humanity.

Rule of Thumb: Never park next to a chemical factory when it’s on fire, otherwise your ride may turn into an unintended art project, and that’s exactly what happened here. Fortunately there were no injuries when the  plant in New Iberia Louisiana blew a fiery gasket on 15 June.
____________________________________________________

Folks, I’ve got an announcement to make. This may be my last post for the OOT for a while.

This is NOT a flounce, as I’ve had an awful lot of fun here. My decision has nothing to do with the admins or commenters at The Blogmocracy, or anything discussed on this blog ‘o fun. I’ve just got some personal business to take care of, nothing more, nothing less.

I’ll still be lurking and snarking from time to time, both here and on Dod.

With that said, if any Blogmockrateers want to step up to the plate, I left the light on and the seat up for you on The Overnight Open Thread.

The 04 July Weekend Open, Part 4

by coldwarrior ( 87 Comments › )
Filed under Open thread at July 4th, 2011 - 7:40 pm

The last open thread of the holiday weekend.

This is what it is like to be a firework.