► Show Top 10 Hot Links

Posts Tagged ‘Speaker John Boehner’

Friday with the Hammer: The Rodan Edition

by Phantom Ace ( 111 Comments › )
Filed under Barack Obama, Democratic Party, Economy, Elections 2012, George W. Bush, Misery Index, Progressives, Republican Party, unemployment at July 29th, 2011 - 2:00 pm

Speranza is off today, therefore I have volunteered to do Friday with the Hammer.

The debt ceiling debate has come down to the wire. House Speaker John Boehner is introducing a 2 stage bill that extends the debt ceiling for 6 months. A commission will be formed for fiscal and tax reform, then those recommendations will be included in the phase 2 debt ceiling vote. Personally and I know this sounds cynical, I don’t think the GOP should do any fiscal or tax reform until after the 2012 elections. Just like the Left rammed Obamacare down our throats, we should, after 2013 with control of the House, Senate and  White House, ram tax, regulatory and fiscal reform down their throats.

Charles Krauthammer is urging Republicans to keep their powder dry and pass the Boehner plan. His thinking is, why do any reforms that help Obama? Plus with just the House, Democrats would have input into any reforms made.

We’re only at the midpoint. Obama won a great victory in 2008 that he took as a mandate to transform America toward European-style social democracy. The subsequent counterrevolution delivered to that project a staggering rebuke in November 2010. Under our incremental system, however, a rebuke delivered is not a mandate conferred. That awaits definitive resolution, the rubber match of November 2012.

I have every sympathy with the conservative counterrevolutionaries. Their containment of the Obama experiment has been remarkable. But reversal — rollback, in Cold War parlance — is simply not achievable until conservatives receive a mandate to govern from the White House.

Lincoln is reputed to have said: I hope to have God on my side, but I must have Kentucky. I don’t know whether conservatives have God on their side (I keep getting sent to His voicemail), but I do know that they don’t have Kentucky — they don’t have the Senate, they don’t have the White House. And under our constitutional system, you cannot govern from one house alone. Today’s resurgent conservatism, with its fidelity to constitutionalism, should be particularly attuned to this constraint, imposed as it is by a system of deliberately separated — and mutually limiting — powers.

Given this reality, trying to force the issue — trying to turn a blocking minority into a governing authority — is not just counter-constitutional in spirit but self-destructive in practice.

Read it all: The Debt-Ceiling Divide

I am no fan of Speaker Boehner and the Rockefeller Republicans. They are at heart liberals who like big government, have a soft spot for Islam and believe in nation building wars. That said, the Tea Party Conservatives and Libertarians still don’t have enough strength to enact their reforms. If reforms are done, Obama and the Progressives will have input. This means whatever reforms are done will be watered down. 

The psychological effects might help the markets and thus the economy. If the economy shows any slight improvement, it will be Obama who gets credit. Therefore, it’s not in Conservatives’ interest to enact any reform. A sluggish economy helps the GOP and would make it easier to defeat Obama.  Hence, it’s not in our interest to enact any reform until 2013.

As of this writing Obama’s approval is in the mid 40’s. Any normal politician would be in the low 30’s. I know many here don’t want to believe the numbers, but we should assume they are accurate. A slight improvement in economic conditions will send his numbers into the low 50’s. This would make him even tougher to beat. Many people have an emotional investment in Obama because he symbolizes to them a way for America to cleanse its sins. We are dealing not with a politician, but a pseudo religious cult of personality. We have to keep this in mind. We should not help Obama improve the economy.

Many will not like what I wrote, but I am looking at it from a Machiavellian viewpoint. Vote for whetever BS cuts are proposed. The markets will not be impressed and the economy will stay sluggish. A bad economy makes it easier to beat Obama. Just think about this long term. Then after 2013, we can purge the McCain-Bush Syndicate wing of the GOP.

White House issues Veto statement on Boehner’s bill

by Phantom Ace ( 5 Comments › )
Filed under Barack Obama, Democratic Party, Economy, Elections 2012, Headlines, Republican Party at July 26th, 2011 - 4:30 pm

White House advisors have issued a statement on Boehner’s debt ceiling plan. They have recommended that Obama vetoes it.

 The Administration strongly opposes House passage of the amendment in the nature of a substitute to S. 627. If S. 627 is presented to the President, the President’s senior advisors would recommend that he veto this bill.

Obama wants this veto.

 

Obama to address Nation at 9:00 PM EST

by Phantom Ace ( 411 Comments › )
Filed under Barack Obama, Democratic Party, Economy, Republican Party at July 25th, 2011 - 8:00 pm

President Barack Hussein Obama is schedule to address the nation tonight at 9:00 PM EST.
He will discuss the ongoing stalemate over the debt ceiling stalemate.

House Speaker John Boehner

(This is an Open Thread)

Tax-Spend-Regulate

by coldwarrior ( 72 Comments › )
Filed under Economy, government, Politics, Regulation at July 12th, 2011 - 11:30 am

Tax-Spend-Regulate…those seem to be the modern functions of government.

 

Right now the GOP leadership and the president are in negotiations over two of the three heads of this evil hydra-headed government monster (funny. i accidentally typed mobster; hmmmm….maybe mobster is a better analogy)

 

Regardless of mobster or monster, the cost to the economy is exactly the same, regulations ARE taxation when we get down to the bottom line. If fedgov says you have to do X, then you have to pay to do X. For Example, that environmental remediation company has to come in and make your factory compliant to regulations.  In effect, the fedgov just took money out of your pocket and gave it to another company…a tax, no matter how you slice it.

 

All of those regulations force many companies to hire lawyers just to prevent the company from accidentally running afoul of one of the ten thousand plus regulations int the Federal Register. Hiring all of these lawyers is also a tax. It takes money from companies and subsidizes the legal industry. (I am not beating on lawyers here, just an example).

 

Right now. In DC, the powers that be are deciding the tax and spend part of the above equation. Why not bring regulations into the negotiation mix as well, Speaker Boehner. After all, regulations cost money  out here in job creation land. Why not cut taxes, spending, and regulating?

 

(Ironically, i thought of this topic last night and started writing it this morning, then I read this: http://www.nationalreview.com/articles/271503/put-ceiling-overregulation-john-berlau?page=2

Looks like they beat me to the presses!) so, at that point i quit writing and decided to work on the Honey-Do list.

 

Do check out the above article at NRO.

 

Check this link!  Great idea!