First time visitor? Learn more.

WrathofG-d banned from LGF because of fight with Sharmuta

by Phantom Ace ( 169 Comments › )
Filed under Blogwars, LGF at December 19th, 2008 - 10:50 am

Islamist supporter Sharmuta has gotten WrathofG-d banned. The reason, an argument over Evolution.

178 WrathofG-d 12/18/08 5:17:58 pm reply quote -14

re: #174 Killgore Trout

Killgore, let’s be honest here. (A) You are right. The cause here on LGF was led by morons for the most part. (B) If Charles were instead a Biblical Literalist, 80% or so on LGF would be professing their love for the Creation. To deny that group think, and the power of Charles on LGF, had anything to do with it is a bit naive. Is it all of it? No way! But we cannot ignore the obvious.

183 Sharmuta 12/18/08 5:19:34 pm reply quote 7

re: #178 WrathofG-d

More insults! Yeah- we’re all just sheeple who can’t think for ourselves. Thankfully, we have Charles to tell us what to think, but you’d rather say it’s the supporters of science that are insulting. Personally- I’ve found the creationists to be the more insulting ones, and you’re backing up my point. Thanks.

191 Sharmuta 12/18/08 5:22:09 pm reply quote 4

re: #184 WrathofG-d

The Wedge Strategy. Read up on it, because these folks would like to get their hands on your children and “bring them to Jesus”.

194 WrathofG-d 12/18/08 5:22:32 pm reply quote -8

re: #183 Sharmuta

More insults! Yeah- we’re all just sheeple who can’t think for ourselves. Thankfully, we have Charles to tell us what to think, but you’d rather say it’s the supporters of science that are insulting. Personally- I’ve found the creationists to be the more insulting ones, and you’re backing up my point. Thanks.

I NEVER stated that everyone that believed in Evolution was a sheeple. In fact, when I was typing that statement I surely didn’t have you specifically in mind. Honestly, I didn’t have any poster specifically in mind. It is interesting that you believed I was referring to you however.

209 Sharmuta 12/18/08 5:27:23 pm reply quote 8

re: #202 WrathofG-d

I don’t think I have you pegged wrong at all. It’s not the first time you’ve insulted Charles and LGFers.

214 WrathofG-d 12/18/08 5:29:13 pm reply quote -7

re: #201 Sharmuta

Find me a thread where most DISAGREE with Charles and I will consider changing my mind.

217 WrathofG-d 12/18/08 5:30:01 pm reply quote -11

re: #209 Sharmuta

I see you are working to get me banned. You really should relax. I don’t hold such hard feelings towards you.

221 Sharmuta 12/18/08 5:31:07 pm reply quote 3

re: #217 WrathofG-d

No- you’re doing fine on your own.

Ignore my link to the Wedge Strategy. No skin off my nose.

Then the Charles comes in to help his lackey

256 Charles 12/18/08 5:42:21 pm reply quote 14

I see WrathofG-D is making it all about him again.

He was banned once before for this kind of stuff, of course. Looks like it’s been eating at him.

261 WrathofG-d 12/18/08 5:44:13 pm reply quote 0

re: #242 NY Nana

Nana,

I made a comment about the posters on LGF, and Sharm misstated that it was an attack on Charles. Everyone knows the quickest way to get banned around here is to attack Charles. Thus I believe my statement was accurate. I am actually NOT looking for a fight, quite the opposite actually. You know me well enough to know that, I would have thought.

263 Charles 12/18/08 5:45:18 pm reply quote 9

re: #261 WrathofG-d

Nana,

I made a comment about the posters on LGF, and Sharm misstated that it was an attack on Charles. Everyone knows the quickest way to get banned around here is to attack Charles. Thus I believe my statement was accurate. I am actually NOT looking for a fight, quite the opposite actually.

You know me well enough to know that, I would have thought.

Actually, there is a quicker way, and you just found it. I bid you adieu.

This was a set up. Charles banned the poster because he said the truth, LGF is a yes cult!

(Hat tip:Bweep)

Tags:

Comments

Comments and respectful debate are both welcome and encouraged.

Comments are the sole opinion of the comment writer, just as each thread posted is the sole opinion or post idea of the administrator that posted it or of the readers that have written guest posts for the Blogmocracy.

Obscene, abusive, or annoying remarks may be deleted or moved to spam for admin review, but the fact that particular comments remain on the site in no way constitutes an endorsement of their content by any other commenter or the admins of this Blogmocracy.

We're not easily offended and don't want people to think they have to walk on eggshells around here (like at another place that shall remain nameless) but of course, there is a limit to everything.

Play nice!

Comments are closed.

Back to the Top

The Blogmocracy

website design was Built By All of Us