First time visitor? Learn more.

Rejection of Obamcare has deeper roots

by Phantom Ace ( 56 Comments › )
Filed under Barack Obama, Communism, Democratic Party, Economy, Healthcare, Liberal Fascism, Progressives at September 1st, 2009 - 6:17 pm

As I have been writing here, the resistance to the Progressive agenda has to do with the nature of the American people. The ancestors of most Americans left Feudal or Elitist regimes, to come here for freedom. By nature Americans don’t like totalitarian movements and agendas of control. This is an ingrained instinct the Progressives had underestimated, when they attempted to impose their Eugenics based Health-Care agenda.

WASHINGTON — Recent town-hall uproars weren’t just about health care. They were also eruptions of concern that the government is taking on too much at once.

That suggests trouble for the president and his party, and fears of losses in next year’s midterm election are likely to shape the Democrats’ fall agenda.

At August’s town-hall meetings, voters often started with complaints about health care, only to shift to frustrations about all the other things President Barack Obama and the Democrats have done or tried to do since January. The $787 billion economic-stimulus package, the government-led rescue of General Motors Corp. and climate-change legislation all came in for criticism.

Read the rest.

Obama-Stalin

Americans don’t trust the concept of an intrusive Government in their lives.  Progressives have tried to spin it as if they want to help people. In reality, many  realize then this is an attempt by an elite to impose control on us. It is being  rejected because Americans don’t want Neo-Feudalism.

Tags:

Comments

Comments and respectful debate are both welcome and encouraged.

Comments are the sole opinion of the comment writer, just as each thread posted is the sole opinion or post idea of the administrator that posted it or of the readers that have written guest posts for the Blogmocracy.

Obscene, abusive, or annoying remarks may be deleted or moved to spam for admin review, but the fact that particular comments remain on the site in no way constitutes an endorsement of their content by any other commenter or the admins of this Blogmocracy.

We're not easily offended and don't want people to think they have to walk on eggshells around here (like at another place that shall remain nameless) but of course, there is a limit to everything.

Play nice!

Comments are closed.

Back to the Top

The Blogmocracy

website design was Built By All of Us