First time visitor? Learn more.

Dr. Phil makes excuses for Imperialist Nidal Hasan

by Phantom Ace ( 408 Comments › )
Filed under Free Speech, Islamic Invasion, Islamic Terrorism, Leftist-Islamic Alliance, Liberal Fascism, Multiculturalism, Progressives at November 10th, 2009 - 8:28 pm

The excuses keep pilling up for Imperialist aggressor, Nidal Hasan. Psychologists are making every excuse in the book for this killer. Their goal is to deflect from the obvious. He committed the Ft. Hood shooting in the name of his Colonialist Ideology. Even Dr. Phil is making up reasons for this act of aggression.

It can by now come as no surprise that the Fort Hood massacre yielded an instant flow of exculpatory media meditations on the stresses that must have weighed on the killer who mowed down 13 Americans and wounded 29 others. Still, the intense drive to wrap this clear case in a fog of mystery is eminently worthy of notice.

The tide of pronouncements and ruminations pointing to every cause for this event other than the one obvious to everyone in the rational world continues apace. Commentators, reporters, psychologists and, indeed, army spokesmen continue to warn portentously, “We don’t yet know the motive for the shootings.”

What a puzzle this piece of vacuity must be to audiences hearing it, some, no doubt, with outrage. To those not terrorized by fear of offending Muslim sensitivities, Maj. Nidal Malik Hasan’s motive was instantly clear: It was an act of terrorism by a man with a record of expressing virulent, anti-American, pro-jihadist sentiments. All were conspicuous signs of danger his Army superiors chose to ignore.

Read the rest.

Welcome to America in 2009, where we can’t name our enemy. Our nation has been subject to Colonialist Imperial attacks, but we can’t discuss our enemy’s motives. This is just another example of how Progressivsim is a cancer destroying our nation.

Tags: ,

Comments

Comments and respectful debate are both welcome and encouraged.

Comments are the sole opinion of the comment writer, just as each thread posted is the sole opinion or post idea of the administrator that posted it or of the readers that have written guest posts for the Blogmocracy.

Obscene, abusive, or annoying remarks may be deleted or moved to spam for admin review, but the fact that particular comments remain on the site in no way constitutes an endorsement of their content by any other commenter or the admins of this Blogmocracy.

We're not easily offended and don't want people to think they have to walk on eggshells around here (like at another place that shall remain nameless) but of course, there is a limit to everything.

Play nice!

Comments are closed.

Back to the Top

The Blogmocracy

website design was Built By All of Us