First time visitor? Learn more.

NY Times snitches on CIA and Blackwater

by Phantom Ace ( 289 Comments › )
Filed under Liberal Fascism, Media, Progressives, Tranzis at December 11th, 2009 - 5:00 am

There was a saying when I was growing up in NYC back in the late 80’s/Early 90’s, snitches catch stitches. The NY Times seems to have not gotten that memo. This rag of a Progressive paper has ratted out our nation on many occasions. Back in the 30’s this same Paper supported Hitler, Stalin and Mussolini. They have supported our enemies throughout it’s history. Now they rat out CIA and Blackwater operations that helped defeat the Iraqi Insurgents.

Snitch

WASHINGTON — Private security guards from Blackwater Worldwide participated in some of the C.I.A.’s most sensitive activities — clandestine raids with agency officers against people suspected of being insurgents in Iraq and Afghanistan and the transporting of detainees, according to former company employees and intelligence officials.

The raids against suspects occurred on an almost nightly basis during the height of the Iraqi insurgency from 2004 to 2006, with Blackwater personnel playing central roles in what company insiders called “snatch and grab” operations, the former employees and current and former intelligence officers said.

Read the rest.

The NY Times is a Tranzi Progressive newspaper. They don’t care about or support America. The question is, who gave them this information? I would not be shocked if the treacherous Obama regime gave the Times this information. As for the Blackwater Operatives that talked, shame on you for betraying secrets. Snitching is dishonorable and a form of treachery.

Tags: , , ,

Comments

Comments and respectful debate are both welcome and encouraged.

Comments are the sole opinion of the comment writer, just as each thread posted is the sole opinion or post idea of the administrator that posted it or of the readers that have written guest posts for the Blogmocracy.

Obscene, abusive, or annoying remarks may be deleted or moved to spam for admin review, but the fact that particular comments remain on the site in no way constitutes an endorsement of their content by any other commenter or the admins of this Blogmocracy.

We're not easily offended and don't want people to think they have to walk on eggshells around here (like at another place that shall remain nameless) but of course, there is a limit to everything.

Play nice!

Comments are closed.

Back to the Top

The Blogmocracy

website design was Built By All of Us