First time visitor? Learn more.

How Free Market Economics saved Chile

by Phantom Ace ( 63 Comments › )
Filed under Economy, Politics, Progressives, Tranzis, World at March 2nd, 2010 - 11:00 am

Chile, which was recently hit with a massive Earthquake and is dealing with some chaos in the aftermath, is no Haiti. Unlike Haiti, Chile is a modern 1st world country that has a thriving economy. This is due in large part to Augosto Pinochet who removed the Totalitarian Progressive regime of Salvador Allende. He realized the way to remove the appeal of Progressivism was to modernize Chile’s economy. He did this by putting Chilean Economists of the “Chicago School” in charge. Chileans who learned economics in the University of Chicago at the hands of Milton Friedman.

Milton Friedman has been dead for more than three years. But his spirit was surely hovering protectively over Chile in the early morning hours of Saturday. Thanks largely to him, the country has endured a tragedy that elsewhere would have been an apocalypse.

Earthquake magnitudes are measured on a logarithmic scale. The earthquake that hit Northridge in 1994 measured 6.7 on the Richter scale. But its seismic-energy yield was only half that of the 7.0 quake that hit Haiti in January, which was the equivalent of 2,000 Hiroshima-sized bombs exploding all at once.

By contrast, Saturday’s earthquake in Chile measured 8.8. That’s nearly 500 times more powerful than Haiti’s, or about one million Hiroshimas. Yet Chile’s reported death toll—711 as of this writing—was a tiny fraction of the 230,000 believed to have perished in Haiti.

Read it here: How Milton Friedman Saved Chile

Thanks to Pinochet’s strong leadership and Chicago Boys economic tutoring at the hands of Milton Friedman, Chile enjoys the highest standard of living in Latin America. Chileans once immigrated, now Chile is filled with Immigrants from Argentina, Peru and Bolivia. Their privatized Social Security has enabled many Chileans to retire wealthy and enjoy the fruits of their years of work.  Chile is an example for all nations, even America, to model after.

The Progressive racists hate the Chilean model. They admire failed regimes like Cuba and Venezuela because they want Hispanic nations to be poor. In their racist minds a Latin nation like Chile that disproves their theory of Racial Supremacy, is an abomination. Hence except for the Earthquake, it’s success never makes the news. It’s not convenient to have a wealthy Latin nation. Colombia is now on the same path as Chile and it’s leader Alvaro Uribe is demonized and the racist Democrats have been holding up the Free Trade Agreement for three years now. Clearly Progressives don’t want more successful Latin nations.

The Left loves failed Latin nations hence their love of Castro. While they admire losers like Che Guevara, rightwing Latins like me admire winners like Augosto Pinochet. I would rather follow a successful model than a failed one.

Tags: , ,

Comments

Comments and respectful debate are both welcome and encouraged.

Comments are the sole opinion of the comment writer, just as each thread posted is the sole opinion or post idea of the administrator that posted it or of the readers that have written guest posts for the Blogmocracy.

Obscene, abusive, or annoying remarks may be deleted or moved to spam for admin review, but the fact that particular comments remain on the site in no way constitutes an endorsement of their content by any other commenter or the admins of this Blogmocracy.

We're not easily offended and don't want people to think they have to walk on eggshells around here (like at another place that shall remain nameless) but of course, there is a limit to everything.

Play nice!

Comments are closed.

Back to the Top

The Blogmocracy

website design was Built By All of Us