First time visitor? Learn more.

Charles Johnson wrongly attacks concerned parents

by Daedalus ( 169 Comments › )
Filed under Blogwars, LGF, Progressives at July 28th, 2010 - 6:48 pm

I’m sorry to post on this, but I feel Charles Johnson has crossed a line.

Parents associated with the 9/12 movement recently had a book removed named: Revolutionary Voices: A Multicultural Queer Youth Anthology. This book promotes “alternate lifestyles” for the youth. I’m a Libertarian leaning Conservative, but there are limits. I would not like a book promoting irresponsible heterosexual sex among the young either, so the fact it’s about youth homosexuality is irrelevant. Do teenagers have sex, yup I was one that did. The issue is whether we promote this behaviors or educate them on the dangers of unprotected sex, STD’s and the risks of Pregnancies. This book is not that, it is glorifying irresponsible sex to young people. The parents took a stand and they are within their rights.

Take a look at some of the chapters:

Concerned parents who also are members of the 9/12 movement, asked the Burlington County Library System to remove it. These parents were in their right. However, because of their affiliation with Glenn becks and his 9/12 movement, Charles Johnson attacked them.

In the sick twisted mind of Charles Johnson, parents don’t have a right to be against a book that promotes irresponsible behavior and is classified as a Child Porn book. To him, standing up to  groups promoting radical agenda, is censorship. Clearly this man has had no children and understand what it’s like being a parent. The title alone implies Progressive radicalism and not a mainstream book for Teens.

Charles Johnson has crossed a line due to his hate of Glenn Beck. Rather than analyze the situation, he let his hate get the better of him. The obscure mediocre 70’s/80’s Jazz Musician will even defend a radical book that is classified as Child porn

I apologize to everyone on the blog for this post, but I feel he is wrong to attack concerned parents and needs to be called on it.


Tags: , ,

Comments

Comments and respectful debate are both welcome and encouraged.

Comments are the sole opinion of the comment writer, just as each thread posted is the sole opinion or post idea of the administrator that posted it or of the readers that have written guest posts for the Blogmocracy.

Obscene, abusive, or annoying remarks may be deleted or moved to spam for admin review, but the fact that particular comments remain on the site in no way constitutes an endorsement of their content by any other commenter or the admins of this Blogmocracy.

We're not easily offended and don't want people to think they have to walk on eggshells around here (like at another place that shall remain nameless) but of course, there is a limit to everything.

Play nice!

Comments are closed.

Back to the Top

The Blogmocracy

website design was Built By All of Us