First time visitor? Learn more.

The week from hell

by Mojambo ( 91 Comments › )
Filed under Barack Obama, Blogmocracy, Dhimmitude, Guest Post, Politics at August 22nd, 2010 - 5:30 pm

I always cringe when people like Bill O’Reilly constantly tout the “Obama is a smart guy” line. No he is not smart, he is a bit too clever for his own good and I have noticed that no matter what job he holds, he always seems to be looking to his next job. Maybe he can be The Leader of the One World Government in 2016.  As far as this Mosque thing goes, I think it has reawakened the passions on the arrogant entitlement nature of Islam that may have been laying dormant since the Iraq war went bad.

by Clarice Feldman

The week began for Obama with him basking in the love of his invited guests at a White House Iftar dinner and ended with his party in disarray, his political fortunes plunging even further, and his sixth (Michelle’s seventh) lavish vacation of the season imperiled by floating poop.

Iftar
Celebrating Iftar at the White House, the president, as is his wont, made ridiculous panders to the audience, suggesting Islam had contributed much to this country since its creation and  suggesting by both word and tone that he supported the building of the Cordoba House mosque near the ruins of the World Trade Center.

[…]

a. Cordoba House, aka Park-51
There is something peculiar about the way Democrats think we ought to memorialize the worst attack on American soil, an attack by nineteen Moslems, supported by their fellow religionists and certainly some Moslem countries. (Gallup’s latest survey indicates that 7% of the Moslem world hates us — that’s 80 million people.) While we pay the high costs for this attack, both in rebuilding the ruins and compensating those who suffered it, but as well in daily inconveniences in public buildings, transport, and higher military defense costs, so many on the left — which, face it, is now synonymous with the Democratic Party — think we ought to use these sacred spots to reach out and touch our enemies, gestures which in those places are seen only as weakness.

[…]

(b) The Storm that followed
The double lutz triple mosque spin by Obama had hardly been completed when the politicians of all stripes and voters weighed in, and the fancy footwork was not getting the kind of score the president apparently thought it would. Instead, it started a battle which continues to erode his support his party’s. (Some nutters in the Moslem world abroad have suggested the whole thing is really a Zionist plot, but I’m beginning to think Obama himself is a Republican plant designed to bring the mainstream media hacks, who promoted him into office and continue to cover his behind, and his own party into such ignominy that they may never recover.)

The issue to anyone who is an adult is not the legal right to build a mosque in that part of the city, nor the right to freedom of religion; it is the propriety of building a thirteen-story mosque within the very area hit with the debris of the attack.

People who have no problem attacking Israelis for building apartments on their own land in Jerusalem, opposing energy companies for surface mining and constructing generating facilities, and denying even the right to smoke in one’s one home and car are suddenly championing private property rights. People who would require that Catholic doctors and hospitals perform abortions, that kosher butchering be made illegal, and that Mormons be boycotted for opposing gay marriage are now championing religious freedom. You  really can’t make up this stuff.

[…]

(c ) Nostalgia for George Bush
Maureen Dowd begged George Bush to weigh in on the matter and save Obama’s bacon…er…hide. So did Eugene Robinson, and Peter Beinart wrote that he was feeling nostalgic for the former president.

So were the residents of Martha’s Vineyard (Obama vacation spot) where Bush (“Miss Me Yet?”) T-shirts were outselling pro-Obama ones.

[…]

And while it wasn’t likely nostalgia for Bush, Obama managed to wee-wee up all of Los Angeles with security blockades as he attended a fundraiser for Barabara Boxer in Hancock Park, a fundraiser where two of the sponsors, Barbara Streisand and Jeffrey Katzensberg, were no-shows.

When you’ve lost Barbra and Jeff…

By week’s end, the president, his approval ratings scraping bottom, made it to Martha’s Vineyard in time to learn that Tisbury Great Pond, which fronts on the expensive rental vacation estate they are staying at, is contaminated with coliform fecal  bacteria.

It was a week where everything around Obama turned to merde.

[…]

Read the rest here: Looking for love in all the wrong places


Addendum by Huckfunn


Blogmocracy in Action!
Guest post by: Huckfunn!


AP shills for Barrak Hussein Obama

The Associated Press doesn’t want its readers to be confused about the proposed “Ground Zero Mosque”. Therefore, AP Deputy Managing Commissar for Standards and Production, Tom Kent, issued a directive that the term “Ground Zero Mosque” should be avoided in future articles and the following terms be used in lieu thereof:

_ mosque 2 blocks from WTC site
_ Muslim (or Islamic) center near WTC site
_ mosque near ground zero
_ mosque near WTC site

Additionally, the Abominable Press reminds its minions to toe the line as to President Obama’s position on the Non-Ground Zero Mosque:

Here is a succinct summary of President Obama’s position:
Obama has said he believes Muslims have the right to build an Islamic center in New York as a matter of religious freedom, though he’s also said he won’t take a position on whether they should actually build it.

Succinct? Are you kidding? Does anyone really believe that O-hole’s position on the Anything-Else-But-Ground-Zero Mosque is succinct? By the way; is he Hindu or Lutheran? He’s so “nuanced”, ya know.

Read the whole sorry thing here.

– Huckfunn

Tags: , ,

Comments

Comments and respectful debate are both welcome and encouraged.

Comments are the sole opinion of the comment writer, just as each thread posted is the sole opinion or post idea of the administrator that posted it or of the readers that have written guest posts for the Blogmocracy.

Obscene, abusive, or annoying remarks may be deleted or moved to spam for admin review, but the fact that particular comments remain on the site in no way constitutes an endorsement of their content by any other commenter or the admins of this Blogmocracy.

We're not easily offended and don't want people to think they have to walk on eggshells around here (like at another place that shall remain nameless) but of course, there is a limit to everything.

Play nice!

Comments are closed.

Back to the Top

The Blogmocracy

website design was Built By All of Us