First time visitor? Learn more.

Treacherous Chuck defends the Muslim Brotherhood and Sharia Law

by Daedalus ( 211 Comments › )
Filed under Blogwars, Islamic Invasion, Islamic Supremacism, Islamists, Leftist-Islamic Alliance, LGF, Multiculturalism, Progressives, Sharia (Islamic Law), Tranzis at September 24th, 2010 - 9:00 pm

The washed up Jazz Guitarist and failed blogger Charles “Icarus” Johnson has now completed his path over to The Progressive-Islamic Axis. Many readers here and at other blogs first read about the dangers of the Muslim Brotherhood at LGF. There they read articles by Robert Spencer, Steve Emerson and Mark Steyn warning about Islamic colonization tactics of this organization. The Jazz Man’s blog was the place to go to get information, now he defends the Muslim Brotherhood. He links to an article which claims the Brotherhood is not a threat and therefore it’s just a bogeyman. He is also of the opinion that concern for the spread of Sharia law is nothing but hysteria.

Who would have thought just two years ago that the Jazz Man would be defending the Muslim Brotherhood and claiming that worries over Sharia Law are a hysteria? He has turned his back on everything he stood for. He claims the Muslim Brotherhood are now just an organization like any other and they are just misunderstood. In his twisted mind, the Catholic Church is  a threat, not this vile totalitarian organization. He deserves the name Treacherous Chuck. He’s a traitor and an enabler of the Islamic Imperialist agenda.

Has he pronounced the Shahada?

Iapyx gives us his take on this over at The Diary of Daedalus. He points out that Chuck is linking to an article attacking “neo-Cons”. We know when Leftists use that term, who they’re really attacking.

video update from savage:

This is Muslim Brotherhood ideology at its base. This is the ideology that Chuckie promotes even if he doesn’t see it as such.

Tags: , ,

Comments

Comments and respectful debate are both welcome and encouraged.

Comments are the sole opinion of the comment writer, just as each thread posted is the sole opinion or post idea of the administrator that posted it or of the readers that have written guest posts for the Blogmocracy.

Obscene, abusive, or annoying remarks may be deleted or moved to spam for admin review, but the fact that particular comments remain on the site in no way constitutes an endorsement of their content by any other commenter or the admins of this Blogmocracy.

We're not easily offended and don't want people to think they have to walk on eggshells around here (like at another place that shall remain nameless) but of course, there is a limit to everything.

Play nice!

Comments are closed.

Back to the Top

The Blogmocracy

website design was Built By All of Us