First time visitor? Learn more.

Beyond “skewing” – California “Air Board” Must Be Held To Account

by Kafir ( 246 Comments › )
Filed under Blogmocracy, Elections 2010, Guest Post, Politics, Progressives at October 8th, 2010 - 9:00 pm

Blogmocracy in Action!
Guest post by: Bumr50!


The negligence of this body is not startling.

The degree to which they have misrepresented their data, on which the legislature depends in order to formulate standards, is.

Overestimate fueled state’s landmark diesel law

Wyatt Buchanan, Chronicle Sacramento Bureau
San Francisco Chronicle October 8, 2010 04:00 AM

Friday, October 8, 2010

California grossly miscalculated pollution levels in a scientific analysis used to toughen the state’s clean-air standards, and scientists have spent the past several months revising data and planning a significant weakening of the landmark regulation, The Chronicle has found.

The pollution estimate in question was too high – by 340 percent, according to the California Air Resources Board, the state agency charged with researching and adopting air quality standards. The estimate was a key part in the creation of a regulation adopted by the Air Resources Board in 2007, a rule that forces businesses to cut diesel emissions by replacing or making costly upgrades to heavy-duty, diesel-fueled off-road vehicles used in construction and other industries.

340% is not a “miscalculation.”

Even if it is, what accountability do the individuals involved face?
Will industry be permitted to sue for losses incurred by the cumbersome environmental legislation passed under the assumption that the data was accurate?

Oh, I see. It’s that damn economy Bush left us with.

The staff of the powerful and widely respected Air Resources Board said the overestimate is largely due to the board calculating emissions before the economy slumped, which halted the use of many of the 150,000 diesel-exhaust-spewing vehicles in California. Independent researchers, however, found huge overestimates in the air board’s work on diesel emissions and attributed the flawed work to a faulty method of calculation – not the economic downturn.

The overestimate, which comes after another bad calculation by the air board on diesel-related deaths that made headlines in 2009, prompted the board to suspend the regulation this year while officials decided whether to weaken the rule.

In another development, Meg Whitman has stated that if elected Governor she would immediately suspend the new regs.

The Brown camp responded with the succint: “You whore!”

Read more.

– Bumr50

Tags: , , ,

Comments

Comments and respectful debate are both welcome and encouraged.

Comments are the sole opinion of the comment writer, just as each thread posted is the sole opinion or post idea of the administrator that posted it or of the readers that have written guest posts for the Blogmocracy.

Obscene, abusive, or annoying remarks may be deleted or moved to spam for admin review, but the fact that particular comments remain on the site in no way constitutes an endorsement of their content by any other commenter or the admins of this Blogmocracy.

We're not easily offended and don't want people to think they have to walk on eggshells around here (like at another place that shall remain nameless) but of course, there is a limit to everything.

Play nice!

Comments are closed.

Back to the Top

The Blogmocracy

website design was Built By All of Us