First time visitor? Learn more.

The Other Side of The Climate Debate: Do We Really Need to Inflict Economic Harm?

by Flyovercountry ( 100 Comments › )
Filed under Climate, Economy, Science, Tranzis at February 21st, 2011 - 4:30 pm

I realize that every one is busy. An hour and a half video during the week on some nerdy science presentation probably ranks at or near the bottom of everyone’s list of fun and exciting things to do. But, here’s the thing, listening to the environmental activists’ hysterical propaganda has very real world consequences. We listened to the DDT scare, and as a direct result, 50 Million people have died of Malaria. We started taking food produced by farmers, and caused them to change their productive behaviors in order to produce ethanol rather than food, and now, famine has plagued several other nations, including the unfortunate folks of Egypt. Incandescent light bulbs have been made illegal to produce, making the 97 cent light bulb a thing of the past. It has been replaced with the made only in China three times more expensive and actually dangerous CFL bulb. I say actually dangerous, because if one breaks in your home, you will need a hasmat team for the cleanup of spilled mercury. The science is presented in a way that everyone will be able to understand it.  Everyone wants a clean planet to live on.  Everyone wants clean water to drink, and clean air to breathe.  We can achieve this without destroying our economy and standard of living.  Man made Global Warming is a hoax perpetrated by con artists using it as a means to usurp more authority to take control of our destinies from us.  The entire vision of the new, “Green Economy,” is a farce.  The cap and trade laws will produce real economic hardships, and it will be done based on our own naive good intentions.
Catastrophe Denied: The Science of the Skeptics Position (studio version) from Warren Meyer on Vimeo.

Any time you hear the words, the science is settled, in a sentence, you are being lied to.  Ending debate, is the last refuge of a scoundrel.  There is a fortune involved in perpetuating the climate science mythology.  Fleecing the citizens with these carbon exchanges, selling the more expensive goods used in production and utilization of energy, and guilting people to waste more of their hard earned resources to ease their guilty consciences is a very lucrative business.  Why would an entire society switch to a light bulb which is 300% more expensive, requires a hasmat team to clean up if broken, and quite frankly is less reliable.  If you believe it stops at the bulbs, look at the crap coming from Detroit.  When you buy a hybrid car, the Government is subsidizing a huge chunk of the cost, about $8000.  That cost is still there, you just pay for it through higher taxes.  Even with that government assistance, the sticker price paid by the consumer is way higher than for an all gas vehicle of comparable quality and features.  All this for a hoax.  It is time to stop these people, before they are given the opportunity to inflict more damage on America.

Crossposted at Musings of a Mad Conservative.

Tags:

Comments

Comments and respectful debate are both welcome and encouraged.

Comments are the sole opinion of the comment writer, just as each thread posted is the sole opinion or post idea of the administrator that posted it or of the readers that have written guest posts for the Blogmocracy.

Obscene, abusive, or annoying remarks may be deleted or moved to spam for admin review, but the fact that particular comments remain on the site in no way constitutes an endorsement of their content by any other commenter or the admins of this Blogmocracy.

We're not easily offended and don't want people to think they have to walk on eggshells around here (like at another place that shall remain nameless) but of course, there is a limit to everything.

Play nice!

Comments are closed.

Back to the Top

The Blogmocracy

website design was Built By All of Us