Christopher Monckton Trounces Richard Denniss in Climate Debate

Christopher Monckton Trounces Richard Denniss in Climate Debate

by 1389AD ( 7 Comments › )
Filed under Australia, Climate, Energy, Environmentalism, Regulation, Special Report at July 23rd, 2011 - 7:07 pm

National Press Club Debate Christopher Monckton v Richard Denniss 2011 Address

(h/t: Andrew Bolt)

Watch this video on YouTube.

From the YouTube description:

IN FULL (HD) | National Press Club Debate Address Christopher Monckton v Richard Denniss 2011 Australia ABC 19/July/2011

Lord Christopher Monckton is Chief Policy Advisor to the Science and Public Policy Institute. He was Special Advisor to British Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher from 1982 to 1986.

Dr Richard Denniss is the Australia Institute’s Executive Director. He is an economist with a particular interest in the role of regulation

New my website http://wakeup2thelies.com
Subscribe to my Youtube channel http://bit.ly/mz6xrF
Follow me on twitter http://twitter.com/#!/wakeup2thelies
Follow me on face book http://on.fb.me/jlU314

According to Andrew Bolt:

The National Press Club debate’s results:

Lord Monckton – 10

Former Greens adviser Richard Denniss – 1

Journalists – 0.

(Thanks to reader Adam.)

UPDATE

Note that Denniss’s entire argument was to follow the “consensus”. There was no attempt at all to explain the evidence contradicting this manufactured consensus.

Tags: AGW, Global Warming

This entry was posted on Saturday, July 23rd, 2011 at 7:07 pm and is filed under Australia, Climate, Energy, Environmentalism, Regulation, Special Report. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. Both comments and pings are currently closed.

Comments

Comments and respectful debate are both welcome and encouraged.

Comments are the sole opinion of the comment writer, just as each thread posted is the sole opinion or post idea of the administrator that posted it or of the readers that have written guest posts for the Blogmocracy.

Obscene, abusive, or annoying remarks may be deleted or moved to spam for admin review, but the fact that particular comments remain on the site in no way constitutes an endorsement of their content by any other commenter or the admins of this Blogmocracy.

We're not easily offended and don't want people to think they have to walk on eggshells around here (like at another place that shall remain nameless) but of course, there is a limit to everything.

Play nice!

Comments are closed.

Back to the Top