First time visitor? Learn more.

Rand Paul’s support from the Left

by Phantom Ace ( 208 Comments › )
Filed under Libertarianism, Republican Party at September 30th, 2013 - 4:00 pm

One of the oddest phenomenon occurring right now in politics is the surprise support Rand Paul is receiving from some on the Left. With his stances against using drones to kill Americans, domestic spying, opposing nation building and reforming drug laws, many on the Left have grown to like him. This brakes the Right/Left paradigm in many areas and is creating some strange bedfellows.

He came to Washington railing against the party establishment. Once in the Senate, he became one of that body’s foremost critics of war and of increased military spending. He drew national attention for his defense of civil liberties. His use of the real, live, stand-up-and-shout-them-down filibuster took an axe to moribund, genteel traditions of the upper chamber of Congress.  He called for the restoration of the voting rights of felons, a little-remarked-upon issue except to civil rights activists, but one that could tip the balance of electoral politics in key states. He even is pushing for legalized hemp.

Is this liberal hero Bernie Sanders, the socialist from Vermont? Of course not. This lefty hero is Rand Paul, the Republican from Kentucky, who during a period of liberal retreat has somehow emerged as one of the nation’s most articulate defenders of progressive values. Look no further than a Wednesday earlier this month, when Paul testified before the Senate Judiciary Committee against mandatory minimums for non-violent drug offenders. Citing statistics that showed that young minority males were far more likely to face longer prison sentences than other groups, he sounded like a class warrior: “Why are the arrest rates so lopsided? Because it is easier to go into urban areas and make arrests than suburban areas.”

And it has won Paul some plaudits in unlikely corners, with stalwart liberals like Medea Benjamin writing that Paul should be commended for his anti-war stance. The liberal website Truthdig.org has regularly praised Paul’s stances, and the site’s founder, New Left journalist Robert Scheer, has regularly sung the Kentucky Senator’s praises on a nationally syndicated radio show he appears on.

“I have a lot of problems with Rand Paul,” said David Sirota, the liberal author and blogger, citing his positions on the economy and on a woman’s right to choose. “But I think that on issues concerning national security and the domestic security state he is as right as anybody in the Congress—and there aren’t a lot of people in Congress who are good on those issues.”

With the failure of the post 1992 crypto-authoritarian Republican Party and Obama’s Fascistic Democrat Party, many people on both the Right and Left are disillusioned with the current state of politics. When you have Leftists like Glenn Greenwald and Julian Assange praising the Libertarian wing of the GOP and the majority of Republicans embracing Libertarian views over Conservative ones, we could be seeing a political realignment.

I am under no illusion that Rand Paul will ever be President. He’s too intellectual and people don’t like who his father is.  But he is creating a new broad base and inclusive movement that could catapult the GOP back into domination at the Presidential level starting in 2020. The question is, who will take up Rand Paul’s mantle after 2016? That is yet to be determined.

Tags:

Comments

Comments and respectful debate are both welcome and encouraged.

Comments are the sole opinion of the comment writer, just as each thread posted is the sole opinion or post idea of the administrator that posted it or of the readers that have written guest posts for the Blogmocracy.

Obscene, abusive, or annoying remarks may be deleted or moved to spam for admin review, but the fact that particular comments remain on the site in no way constitutes an endorsement of their content by any other commenter or the admins of this Blogmocracy.

We're not easily offended and don't want people to think they have to walk on eggshells around here (like at another place that shall remain nameless) but of course, there is a limit to everything.

Play nice!

Comments are closed.

Back to the Top

The Blogmocracy

website design was Built By All of Us