► Show Top 10 Hot Links

Posts Tagged ‘al Nusra Front’

Hezbollah’s war with al-Nusra and FSA is eroding its capabilities; 12 Lebanese soldiers killed in clashes with Sunnis

by Phantom Ace ( 110 Comments › )
Filed under Al Qaeda, Hezballah, Islamists, Lebanon, Muslim Brotherhood, Sharia (Islamic Law), Syria at June 24th, 2013 - 7:00 am

Hezbollahfuneral17(Funeral of Hezbolah fighter killed in Syria. )

The war in Syria is bleeding Hezbollah’s military capabilities. It has reportedly lost between 500-1000 fighters, many of whom were their elite units. Most of the loses have been done by the Al Qaeda linked Al Nusra Front, who are using Hezbollah’s tactics against them. As the war progresses, Hezbollah will be faced with a dilemma. It has a smaller recruiting pool than Nusra or the FSA, whom can call upon not just Syrian Sunnis, but throughout the Islamic world. The war has also shattered Hezbollah’s image in the Arab world and in many cases, they are now hated more than the Israelis.

Hezbollah’s large-scale involvement in Syria is eroding its military resources, though the extent of the damage it is incurring remains a closely guarded secret.

The Lebanese terrorist organization’s Shi’ite fighters, who were deployed to Syria to fight on behalf of Syrian President Bashar Assad at Iran’s orders, tipped the balance in favor of Assad at the battle of Qusair in recent weeks. But Israeli security analysts said on Sunday the victory came at a heavy price for Hezbollah that is set to rise the longer the organization remains engaged in Syria.

[….]

It is likely that Hezbollah sent some of its quality units based in south Lebanon, originally designated for combat with the IDF, to the battlefields of Syria, Schweitzer said. “They’re suffering casualties as they fight irregular bands of rebels.”

In Syria, Hezbollah is struggling to deal with the same tactics it itself employed in the past against the IDF. A report in The Lebanese Daily Star published last month quoted one Hezbollah fighter as saying that the tactics of the jihadi Jabhat Al-Nusra Front in Syria had “a kind of irritating familiarity.”

This conflict is a god send to the Non Islamic world. May these terrorists continue to kill each other and leave us alone.

UPDATE- by Speranza

12 Lebanese soldiers killed in clashes with Sunnis

Lebanese soldiers fought Sunni Muslim gunmen in the southern city of Sidon on Monday in one of the deadliest outbreaks of violence fueled by sectarian divisions over the civil war in neighboring Syria.

The army said 12 soldiers had been killed in clashes which broke out on Sunday after security forces detained a follower of the hardline Sunni Muslim cleric Sheikh Ahmed al-Assir. His supporters retaliated by opening fire on an army checkpoint.

Security sources put the army death toll at 15, with 60 wounded. They said at least two gunmen were also killed in the clashes but soldiers were surrounding the mosque where Assir’s supporters were based, making it difficult to verify details.

The mosque showed signs of heavy damage from 24 hours of ferocious exchanges of rocket and gunfire.

Sidon had been on edge since violence erupted last week between Sunni and Shi’ite Muslim fighters, at odds over the Syrian conflict which pits mainly Sunni rebels against President Bashar Assad, an Alawite from an offshoot of Shi’ite Islam.

Tensions escalated further when the Lebanese Shi’ite militant group Hezbollah sent fighters into Syria to lead the recapture of a strategic border town by Assad’s forces.

“The army has tried for months to keep Lebanon away from the problems of Syria, and it ignored repeated requests for it to clamp down on Sheikh Ahmed al-Assir’s group,” the military command said in a statement on Sunday.

“But what has happened today has gone beyond all expectations. The army was attacked in cold blood in an attempt to light the fuse in Sidon, just as was done in 1975,” it said, referring to the year that Lebanon’s own civil war began.

Assir, whose supporters accuse the army of giving cover to Hezbollah gunmen, called for people across the country to join him and demanded that “honorable” soldiers defect.

Nusra Fighter to Hezbollah: “We Love Death more than you like Life”

by Phantom Ace ( 2 Comments › )
Filed under Al Qaeda, Headlines, Hezballah, Islamists, Lebanon, Syria at June 2nd, 2013 - 10:02 pm

The Battle of Qusayr is pitting 2 of the most vile organizations against each other, al-Qaeda under the guise of al-Nusra and Hezbollah. In an interview with Al Jazeera, Nusra Front fighters give the Hezzies a chilling message, that we have all heard before. They love death more than they like life. The quote comes after 1:50.

Grab the popcorn and the drinks!

The end of artificial Mideast countries; Hizb’Allah surprised by Al Nusra’s tactics

by Phantom Ace ( 89 Comments › )
Filed under Iraq, Israel, Lebanon, Middle East, Palestinians, Saudi Arabia, Syria at May 31st, 2013 - 10:00 am

sykespicot

If the Syrian War appears very similar to the post colonial African wars, it’s because they have a common origin. Like Africa, The UK and France carved up the region and created countries by lines drawn up by them. Many of the countries they created were artificial and did not reflect religious nor ethnic differences. Syria is perfect example of a nation drawn up without reflecting the reality. The war there reflects the crackup of these artificial Mideast nations.

Expect major tears in the map of the Middle East this summer and fall, as states created by outsiders a century ago finally rip apart.

“Nations” better understood as “tribes with flags” are unlikely to survive the two-year (and counting) bloodbath in Syria and the rising violence in Iraq. Or the turmoils in Bahrain and Yemen and the flood of refugees into Jordan — you name it. It even looks like we’ll see the emergence of independent Kurdistan.

[….]

About then, the Syria war seems likely to transition to partition, as the breakup of Sykes-Picot gets in high gear.

Sykes-Picot? Go back to 1916, when diplomats Sir Mark Sykes of Britain and Francois Georges Picot of France signed a secret agreement to divide the region after their nations won World War I.

The deal created national borders out of thin air, drawing lines to suit the needs and whims of the Europeans — and mostly ignoring on-the-ground ethnic, religious and sectarian realities.

The Brits and French withdrew by mid-century, replaced by Arab kings, dictators and tyrants. But the Sykes-Picot maps remained, defining the new states’ borders.

Until the Arab Spring moved from countries like Egypt and Tunisia (states not dreamed up by Sykes and Picot) to places like Bahrain and Yemen — where the upheavals triggered deeper internal religious, sectarian and tribal divisions.

Similar in-country sectarian unease had already started to undo the state of Iraq, as we left it to its own devices.

[….]

Armed stalement is still the most likely outcome — with a de facto breakup of Syria into Kurdish, Sunni and Allawite mini-states.

Moscow won’t mind: Assad will rule a Damascus-coastal corridor, where most Alawites live, so Russia will keep its influence and its naval base in Tartous.

Iran’s “Shiite crescent” will remain intact, too — from Lebanon through Assadistan into southern Iraq.

But Sunnis will control most of the rest of current Syria, giving the Turks, Saudis and Qataris their piece of the action. Kurdistan will be carved out of current Syria and broken Iraq.

Key Sykes-Picot borders will be gone — with Jordan likely teetering and “central” governments in states like Yemen and Lebanon largely impotent.

The Collapse of the Mideast is the best geostrategic gift to the US since the end of the Cold War. With the Islamic savages killing each other, they will not have time to bother us. The US has gained nothing out of the Mideast and lost much. There is a reason why part of my family left that region more than 100 years ago. The best course of action is to isolate that region and let it implode.

Addedum:

Hizb’Allahs’ forces are still stuck fighting at the Syrian border town of Al Qusasyr. The Lebanese Shia terror group assumed that it would be an easy victory. Instead the Syrian rebels led by Al Nusra has put up a surprising prepared the defense and the battle has turned into a quagmire for the Hezzies. Unlike fighting Israel who values human life, they have met an enemy in Al Nusra who love death more than them. The result is that Hizb’Allah is now in unafmailiar territory fighting a more ruthless enemy.

Those, like Mahdi, who have fought in Syria, acknowledge that the Syrian rebels have been capable fighters and that for the first time, Hezbollah is facing an enemy of the same ideological caliber and with the same kind of training.

“One must say that they are very well trained and very well-equipped,” Mahdi said. “They own state-of-the-art sniper guns; this is how they’ve hunted down our fallen comrades.”

The frequency of funerals for Hezbollah fighters who have died in Syria significantly increased after the battle of Qusair. Countless posters of “Hezbollah martyrs” line the north-south Bekaa Valley highway that leads to Baalbek.

[….]

Jawad maintained that the rebel Free Syrian Army was “totally powerless,” arguing that the extremist Nusra Front was leading the fighting.

“They [rebels] are powerful not only because they apparently have very good training and very sophisticated weaponry,” Jawad said, citing the brutality of Chechen fighters among the ranks of the Nusra Front.

“Nusra is strong because [the fighters] are fearless. I can sense that from the way they launch raids against us,” Jawad continued. “It’s like they really don’t care if they die. They are ruthless and fearless.”

Both Jawad and Mahdi confirmed that many of their comrades were killed in ambushes that were strikingly similar to tactics Hezbollah originally devised when it fought the Israeli army in south Lebanon during the occupation and later on during the 2006 summer war.

“There’s a kind of irritating familiarity,” Jawad noted. “Hezbollah taught Hamas all those tactics to fight the Israelis. Hamas apparently decided to transfer their experience to takfiri groups.”

[….]

When they were in Qusair, the Hezbollah fighters, who were interviewed separately in Beirut and Hermel, said some of the practices of the Nusra Front fighters left them “speechless.”

Besides the booby-trapped hideouts they leave behind, Nusra fighters have a disconcerting night-time ritual, they said.

“At night they burn the corpses that have accumulated during the day,” Abbas said.

[….]

“Takfiris have no respect for the land or for human dignity. They are doing monstrous things,” Jawad said. “At least Israelis put our martyrs in coffins and number them.”

Israel should pay attaention at the developmenets of the battle of  Al Qusasyr. Al Nusra is giving the blueprint of how to defeat Hizb’Allah. ALso, the tactics and skills of Al Nusra should be studied in case the IDF ever has to face this organization in battle. One thing for certain, Hizb’Allah is not an offensive force and can’t even do a seige correctly. Rebels from the FSA and Al Nusra have broken through the seige and have reinforceed their positions in that town.

May they continue to kill each other.

Al Nusra Front is no more

by Phantom Ace ( 115 Comments › )
Filed under Al Qaeda, Islamists at May 20th, 2013 - 8:00 am

Islamicstateofiraqandlevant(Propaganda Poster of al-Qaeda’s Islamic State of Iraq and Syria)

Al Nusra Front was the backbone of the revolt against Bashar Assad. It was their fighters who had won the victories against the Syrian Army, Hizb’Allah and Iranian Basij. Unlike other al-Qaeda outfits, they made alliance with other groups and for the time being tolerated Christians. But success brings envy.

Al Nusra has been al-Qaeda’s biggest success to date. Unlike other al-Qaeda affiliates, they actually won battles and were even viewed as legitimate by the local Syrian people. Al Qaeda central did not like this and jealousy ensued. Al-Qaeda in Iraq moved in and began to take away fighters from this al-Qaeda subsidiary with the blessings of Ayman al-Zawahiri. Now the Syrian element of al Nusra have broken from that organization and are joining the Free Syrian Army and Ahrar al-Sham.

Some of its fighters have withdrawn from the front line against the Assad regime in the northern Syrian city of Aleppo, rebel leaders there have told The Daily Telegraph, and appear to have turned their back on their Syrian leader.

Many Jabhat fighters had been recruited from other, rival militias with the promise of better-funded and better-organised units rather than for ideological reasons.

But they are said to have become disillusioned since their Syrian leader, Abu Mohammed al-Jolani, affirmed his loyalty to al-Qaeda after an apparent takeover at the top of Jabhat by hardline jihadists from Iraq.

“The group has split,” Mohammed Najib Bannan, the head of the Aleppo Judicial Committee’s military arm, said. The committee is backed by the major rebel brigades and runs civil and criminal courts in Aleppo alongside the city’s Sharia court.

[….]

Jabhat fighters in the east of the country had started calling themselves the “Islamic State of Iraq and Syria” on videos posted online – the name preferred by the international al-Qaeda leadership. They include a group that carried out a public execution of three regime officers in the town square in Raqqa last week.

Ayman al-Zawahiri, al-Qaeda’s leader since the death of Osama bin Laden, appointed Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi, the former head of the Islamic State of Iraq, head of a new merged organisation. Al-Jolani apparently acquiesced in this move after initially opposing it.

Baghdadi is regarded as committed to using intense violence for sectarian purposes and to break down society in such a way to give “space” for jihad to flourish. He proclaims the need for an international caliphate, ending national borders.

Many Jabhat fighters say they are Syrians first and joined Jabhat just to rid the country of President Bashar al-Assad, and because the brigade was considered less corrupt and more religious.

Al Nusra was not al-Qaeda enough for al-Zawahiri and he ordered his henchmen in Al-Qaeda in Iraq to take over. This has caused a halt to rebel gains and Assad is now on the offensive in the Damascus and Homs province with the help of Hizb’Allah and Iranians who no longer have to worry about facing al-Nusra.

The result of the demise of al-Nusra means that the likelihood of US intervention and/or openly supplying the rebels will increase. The Syrian rebels can now claim that they are not al-Qaeda. This will be the excuse Obama uses to justify his arming of the rebels. They may not be al-Qaeda, but they are still Islamists.

The demise of al-Nusra shows the backward nature of Islamic thinking. Instead of applauding Nusra’s success, the parent organization was jealous and ended it.