► Show Top 10 Hot Links

Posts Tagged ‘Benny Avni’

The end of artificial Mideast countries; Hizb’Allah surprised by Al Nusra’s tactics

by Phantom Ace ( 89 Comments › )
Filed under Iraq, Israel, Lebanon, Middle East, Palestinians, Saudi Arabia, Syria at May 31st, 2013 - 10:00 am

sykespicot

If the Syrian War appears very similar to the post colonial African wars, it’s because they have a common origin. Like Africa, The UK and France carved up the region and created countries by lines drawn up by them. Many of the countries they created were artificial and did not reflect religious nor ethnic differences. Syria is perfect example of a nation drawn up without reflecting the reality. The war there reflects the crackup of these artificial Mideast nations.

Expect major tears in the map of the Middle East this summer and fall, as states created by outsiders a century ago finally rip apart.

“Nations” better understood as “tribes with flags” are unlikely to survive the two-year (and counting) bloodbath in Syria and the rising violence in Iraq. Or the turmoils in Bahrain and Yemen and the flood of refugees into Jordan — you name it. It even looks like we’ll see the emergence of independent Kurdistan.

[….]

About then, the Syria war seems likely to transition to partition, as the breakup of Sykes-Picot gets in high gear.

Sykes-Picot? Go back to 1916, when diplomats Sir Mark Sykes of Britain and Francois Georges Picot of France signed a secret agreement to divide the region after their nations won World War I.

The deal created national borders out of thin air, drawing lines to suit the needs and whims of the Europeans — and mostly ignoring on-the-ground ethnic, religious and sectarian realities.

The Brits and French withdrew by mid-century, replaced by Arab kings, dictators and tyrants. But the Sykes-Picot maps remained, defining the new states’ borders.

Until the Arab Spring moved from countries like Egypt and Tunisia (states not dreamed up by Sykes and Picot) to places like Bahrain and Yemen — where the upheavals triggered deeper internal religious, sectarian and tribal divisions.

Similar in-country sectarian unease had already started to undo the state of Iraq, as we left it to its own devices.

[….]

Armed stalement is still the most likely outcome — with a de facto breakup of Syria into Kurdish, Sunni and Allawite mini-states.

Moscow won’t mind: Assad will rule a Damascus-coastal corridor, where most Alawites live, so Russia will keep its influence and its naval base in Tartous.

Iran’s “Shiite crescent” will remain intact, too — from Lebanon through Assadistan into southern Iraq.

But Sunnis will control most of the rest of current Syria, giving the Turks, Saudis and Qataris their piece of the action. Kurdistan will be carved out of current Syria and broken Iraq.

Key Sykes-Picot borders will be gone — with Jordan likely teetering and “central” governments in states like Yemen and Lebanon largely impotent.

The Collapse of the Mideast is the best geostrategic gift to the US since the end of the Cold War. With the Islamic savages killing each other, they will not have time to bother us. The US has gained nothing out of the Mideast and lost much. There is a reason why part of my family left that region more than 100 years ago. The best course of action is to isolate that region and let it implode.

Addedum:

Hizb’Allahs’ forces are still stuck fighting at the Syrian border town of Al Qusasyr. The Lebanese Shia terror group assumed that it would be an easy victory. Instead the Syrian rebels led by Al Nusra has put up a surprising prepared the defense and the battle has turned into a quagmire for the Hezzies. Unlike fighting Israel who values human life, they have met an enemy in Al Nusra who love death more than them. The result is that Hizb’Allah is now in unafmailiar territory fighting a more ruthless enemy.

Those, like Mahdi, who have fought in Syria, acknowledge that the Syrian rebels have been capable fighters and that for the first time, Hezbollah is facing an enemy of the same ideological caliber and with the same kind of training.

“One must say that they are very well trained and very well-equipped,” Mahdi said. “They own state-of-the-art sniper guns; this is how they’ve hunted down our fallen comrades.”

The frequency of funerals for Hezbollah fighters who have died in Syria significantly increased after the battle of Qusair. Countless posters of “Hezbollah martyrs” line the north-south Bekaa Valley highway that leads to Baalbek.

[….]

Jawad maintained that the rebel Free Syrian Army was “totally powerless,” arguing that the extremist Nusra Front was leading the fighting.

“They [rebels] are powerful not only because they apparently have very good training and very sophisticated weaponry,” Jawad said, citing the brutality of Chechen fighters among the ranks of the Nusra Front.

“Nusra is strong because [the fighters] are fearless. I can sense that from the way they launch raids against us,” Jawad continued. “It’s like they really don’t care if they die. They are ruthless and fearless.”

Both Jawad and Mahdi confirmed that many of their comrades were killed in ambushes that were strikingly similar to tactics Hezbollah originally devised when it fought the Israeli army in south Lebanon during the occupation and later on during the 2006 summer war.

“There’s a kind of irritating familiarity,” Jawad noted. “Hezbollah taught Hamas all those tactics to fight the Israelis. Hamas apparently decided to transfer their experience to takfiri groups.”

[….]

When they were in Qusair, the Hezbollah fighters, who were interviewed separately in Beirut and Hermel, said some of the practices of the Nusra Front fighters left them “speechless.”

Besides the booby-trapped hideouts they leave behind, Nusra fighters have a disconcerting night-time ritual, they said.

“At night they burn the corpses that have accumulated during the day,” Abbas said.

[….]

“Takfiris have no respect for the land or for human dignity. They are doing monstrous things,” Jawad said. “At least Israelis put our martyrs in coffins and number them.”

Israel should pay attaention at the developmenets of the battle of  Al Qusasyr. Al Nusra is giving the blueprint of how to defeat Hizb’Allah. ALso, the tactics and skills of Al Nusra should be studied in case the IDF ever has to face this organization in battle. One thing for certain, Hizb’Allah is not an offensive force and can’t even do a seige correctly. Rebels from the FSA and Al Nusra have broken through the seige and have reinforceed their positions in that town.

May they continue to kill each other.

Arab Spring turns sour for Egyptian Copts; Fatah-Hamas alliance is a marriage made in hell

by Mojambo ( 113 Comments › )
Filed under Barack Obama, Egypt, Fatah, Gaza, Hamas, Islamic Supremacism, Israel, Muslim Brotherhood, Palestinians at May 12th, 2011 - 11:30 am

The  Arab tyrannies have long tried to distract their people from their miserable lives by focusing anger on scapegoats. The fact that there is no employment in Egypt outside of the government has nothing at all to do with Copts, Israel, or the West but is caused by corrupt leaders is irrelevant to the ignorant mobs.

by Benny Avni

The Arab Spring is turning sour for Egypt’s Christian Coptic minority — whose future now seems even bleaker than it was under the deposed President Hosni Mubarak.

Rioting Saturday in the Imbaba neighborhood, northwest of downtown Cairo, killed 12 people and injured 250 and set two churches ablaze. The cause? A Muslim man alleged that his wife, a Copt who’d converted to Islam, had been kidnapped by her Christian brethren and held hostage inside a church.

The riots, which have yet to die down, were initiated by the bearded men of the harsh Salafist branch of Islam, which is intolerant not only of Christians and Jews but also of Shiites, Sufis and other “heretics” who have strayed from the religion’s supposed early roots. Copts and Egypt’s pro-democracy forces have also blamed the security forces for failing to protect them.

Some 10 percent of Egypt’s population, the Copts are one of the world’s oldest Christian communities and the Mideast’s largest minority. When allowed, they’ve reached the highest echelons of Egyptian society. Boutros Boutros-Ghali, a foreign minister who became UN secretary-general, is but one example.

But for decades now, as Egypt’s economy deteriorated along with its status as leader of the Arab world, Copts have been targeted for attacks — with the Mubarak regime’s passive (and sometime active) approval.

In Mubarak’s later years, Copts complained that Salafists and other Islamists kidnapped Christian women, forcing them to marry Muslims and convert to Islam. As government-related job openings (Egypt’s only economic opportunity) became more scarce, security officials ignored and at times participated in violence against Copts or their religious symbols.

But that was old Egypt, right? Wrong. With the same military establishment and permanent bureaucracy that have held power for the last half-century still running the show, change is coming slowly. When Islamist demonstrators called for the head of the new Coptic governor of the southern Qena province, Emad Mikhail, new Prime Minister Essam Sheraf suspended the appointment last month.

Under Mubarak, sectarian strife was treated as a “security” matter, with the police suppressing all sides, says Cairo University Islamic studies scholar Ali Mabrook, a major advocate of religious tolerance. But with Mubarak gone, passions are erupting.

[…]

This is an old Arab tradition: Unite the people by distracting them from issues like jobs, the rule of law, education and prosperity while igniting passions that are irrelevant to their daily lives. The new attacks on Copts fit that tactic perfectly: “Infidels” are as good as a piñata for venting frustrations as any.

Unlike several Arab countries — Syria, Lebanon, Bahrain and even Iraq, to name a few — where sectarian strife frustrates any would-be democrat, Egypt is largely a homogenous, Sunni society. The plight of Copts therefore hasn’t dominated the headlines and is unlikely to change the way we view the Arab world’s journey toward democracy.

But this isn’t only about Copts. Egypt won’t be fully free of its pharaohs until it rids itself of a culture that seeks scapegoats in lieu of policy that benefits its people. Only when a minority ceases to be the target of riots, and only when its talented members are reintegrated into Egypt’s leadership, will we know that a true Arab Spring is around the corner.

Read the rest here: Egypt’s scapegoats

The ineptitude that Hillary Clinton has shown as Secretary of State in dealing with the Middle East has me wondering how much of an improvement over Obama she really would have been as POTUS.  Her hedging over Syrian brutality and her cautious response to the Fatah-Hamas reconciliation leads me to think that she really is not as smart as her admirers always made her out to be.

by Michael Goodwin

Imagine this nightmare. In stead of sending a team of SEALs to ice Osama bin Laden, President Obama sent a team of negotiators to see if we could talk the terror lord into promises of peace. All he had to do was say the right words, and we’d say 9/11 and all the threats about destroying the Great Satan were forgiven, and gee, let’s be friends.

It’s a sickening scenario, yet it’s not far from what the world, including the United States, is asking Israel to do with Hamas. The Israelis are expected to break bread with the people who still threaten to wipe them off the face of the earth and regularly fire rockets into towns and cities.

[…]

It’s far from clear the truce will hold, and the jockeying for power has begun. Yet pressure is already building on Israel to make a deal that will lead to a unified Palestinian state, despite the fact that Hamas has not met the American and European demand that it renounce violence and accept Israel’s right to exist.

Indeed, one top Hamas leader told al-Jazeera this week that Hamas would never recognize Israel and “the rule of Poles and Ethiopians in their land.” Another denounced the killing of bin Laden and called him “an Arab holy warrior” and martyr.

Those sentiments are hardly a surprise, but what is surprising is that the Obama administration doesn’t see them as red flags. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton swatted away concerns, saying, “We are going to be carefully assessing what this actually means, because there are a number of different potential meanings to it, both on paper and in practice.” She said the United States has not changed its demands on Hamas, but would make a decision when “we actually see what unfolds.”

That’s the wrong answer. As Elliott Abrams writes on his blog at the Council on Foreign Relations, “The United States needs to be far clearer: we cannot and will not support any government where Hamas has a real influence and the security forces stop fighting terror.”

A deputy national security adviser for Mideast affairs under President George W. Bush, Abrams adds that “we must certainly not fund such a government.”

That’s got to be the American bottom line, but by taking such a wait-and-see attitude, the White House is doing something far worse than merely kicking the can down the road. It is effectively giving a green light to letting Hamas join, and maybe run, the Palestinian government without giving up its charter, which calls for the elimination of Israel. Coming as Israelis celebrate their 63rd anniversary of independence, it’s a mighty strange gift.

Alarmed by the White House approach, 27 Democratic senators wrote to Obama, reminding him that the US cannot legally provide aid to any government that includes Hamas, which is a listed terror group. It also cited Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s warning that Fatah can have “peace with Israel or peace with Hamas” but “there is no possibility for peace with both.”

[…]

Read the rest here: Beware, Bam, of unholy alliance

And so it begins

by Mojambo ( 133 Comments › )
Filed under Barack Obama, Hamas, Terrorism at April 7th, 2010 - 12:00 pm

Well color me surprised when I read that several of Obama’s “advisers” and “friends” have been reaching out to Hamas. In Obama world this all makes sense – if you are reaching out to Syria and Iran, how much of a great leap forward would it be to reach out to Hamas (and maybe one day al Qaeda)?

by Benny Avni

Some of President Obama’s friends are making quiet overtures to Hamas — the terrorists who control Gaza. Even if this doesn’t lead to an official dialogue, the administration’s failure to distance itself from such efforts undermines US allies and US alliances.

A seasoned former US ambassador to Israel, Thomas Pickering, and a key member of Bill Clinton’s team at the 2000 Camp David talks, Robert Malley, sat down in Zurich last summer with top Hamas politburo members, Osama Hamdan and Mahmud Zahar.

A classmate of Obama’s at Harvard, Malley has long argued that Middle East diplomacy should include Hamas and Syria. He was an Obama adviser on Arab-Israeli issues in 2008 — until the campaign had to sever ties in the wake of media attention to his regular meetings with Hamas leaders.

Plus, as the Wall Street Journal reported Friday, State Department official Rachel Schneller was on an Al Jazeera debate panel with Hamdan in Qatar last month — and shared coffee and a private chat with him later.

[…]

With the administration still slapping Israel and reaching out to Syria, all this raises fears that Obama might have one of his most drastic foreign-policy reversals yet in the offing. At the least, suspicion is strong that the president has blessed these contacts with a wink and a nod: Meet these folks, see what you can get, then we’ll talk.

America’s long-stated policy is it won’t talk until Hamas fulfills three conditions: recognize Israel’s right to exist, renounce violence and abide by all agreements previously signed by Palestinians and Israelis.

Yet Hamas can’t meet those conditions without rejecting its defining goal, which is to assure that no part of Palestine is controlled by infidels — Jewish, Christian or atheist. The best it can promise — but not necessarily deliver — is a limited cease-fire.

[…]

But in the region, very few people buy the administration’s line. Hamas officials say Obama is different from all his predecessors. As its deputy “foreign minister,” Ahmed Yussuf, told the Journal, “We believe Hamas’ message is reaching its destination” — the White House.

[…]

Read the rest here: Harmful hints of a hand to Hamas

The Arab lobby – Racking up victories

by Mojambo ( 97 Comments › )
Filed under Islamic Finance, Islamists, Politics, Saudi Arabia at March 4th, 2010 - 11:00 am

For all the talk about AIPAC, the Israel lobby and various alleged nefarious grassroots lobbyists for the Jewish state – nobody can touch the Saudi lobby for influence in this country. Ex ambassadors are lured by Saudi money to become lobbyists or heads of Saudi funded think tanks, universities are endowed to create Islamic studies departments, former politicians and cabinet appointees (the late Spiro Agnew, Paul Findley and the odious Brent Scowcroft) are also bought off, all to spread the lies about the peacefulness of Islam and the Arab world.

by Benny Avni

The legend of the Jewish lobby’s influence over US policies continues to grow — even as the Arab lobby, led by the Saudis, keeps racking up successes.

With petrodollars and tender loving care spent lavishly on universities, ex-diplomats, PR firms and gullible journalists, the Arab Lobby constantly pushes two contradictory story lines:

* Arabs seek peace with Israel.
* There’s no place for a Jewish state in the Middle East

This week, Saudi-led Arab countries have convinced Western reporters that they’re advancing the peace process with Israel. Meanwhile, universities in America, Canada, Europe and the Arab world are marking “Israeli Apartheid Week” — a vile campaign meant to return the “Zionism is racism” equation to the top of the world’s agenda.

In Cairo yesterday, the Arab League gave its nod of approval for the Palestinian Authority‘s president, Mahmoud Abbas, to participate in indirect talks with Israel. This is meant to show us that the Arab countries are seeking peace.

Yet, in reality, Israelis and Palestinians have publicly conducted direct talks since the early 1990s. The Palestinians broke off those talks last year under increasing pressure from leading Arab countries, which hoped President Obama would lean hard on the new government of Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu.

[…]

Only a well-oiled PR machine can explain how the Saudis manage to harness such dear liberal values as oppression of women: Even though women there aren’t even permitted to vote or drive, the Saudis managed for years to get good grades from the UN Development Program, which marks “improvement” in women’s status as progress.

But selling the “improvement” line — to the United Nations or to gullible New York Times columnists — isn’t enough. They have to add insult to injury by telling the Times’ Maureen Dowd that women suffer worse in Israel, thanks to “religious militants”.

Please read the whole thing here: The Arab Lobby: Racking up the victories