► Show Top 10 Hot Links

Posts Tagged ‘Che Guevara’

The NYT — defending murderous dictators since Walter Duranty

by Mojambo ( 195 Comments › )
Filed under Cuba, Media at March 3rd, 2010 - 8:30 am

Walter Duranty – the man who denied that there was a famine in the Ukraine  (1932 -33) – Stalin’s favorite Western journalist, was one of the worst reporters ever. Unfortunately he was not alone,  others such as Castro’s de facto public relations man Herbert Matthews were just as bad. To this day the New York Times instead of trying to get at a story puts its ideological objectives first. Let us also not forget the disgraceful non coverage of the Holocaust as it was unfolding because W.A.S.H. (White Anglo Saxon Hebrew) publisher Arthur Hays Sulzberger was afraid that the Times would be referred to as a “Jewish” newspaper. The Times Middle East correspondents are (with some exceptions) particularly bad as well.

by Humberto Fontava

“A foreign reporter — preferably American — was much more valuable to us at that time (1957) than any military victory,” wrote Ernesto “Che” Guevara in his diaries. “Much more valuable than rural recruits for our guerrilla force, were American media recruits to export our propaganda.”

“We cannot for a second abandon propaganda. Propaganda is vital — propaganda is the heart of all struggles,” said Fidel Castro in a letter to a revolutionary colleague in 1954.

“In all essentials Castro’s battle for Cuba was a public relations campaign fought in New York and Washington.” — British historian Hugh Thomas

Fidel Castro has strong ideas of liberty, democracy, social justice, the need to restore Cuba’s Constitution…this amounts to a new deal for Cuba, radical, democratic and therefore anti-Communist. (Herbert Matthews, New York Times Feb. 1957.)

[…]

One Thousand Killed in 5 days of Fierce Street Fighting,” blared a New York Times headline on Jan 4, 1959 about the “battle” of Santa Clara in central Cuba where Ernesto “Che” Guevara earned much of his enduring martial mystique. “Commander Che Guevara appealed to Batista troops for a truce to clear the streets of casualties,” continues the Times article. “Guevara turned the tide in this bloody battle and whipped a Batista force of 3,000 men.”

A year later, Che’s own diaries revealed that his forces suffered exactly one casualty during this Caribbean Stalingrad, as depicted by the Times.  British historian Sir Hugh Thomas, author of a 1700 page Cuban history and who initially vied with Herbert Matthews as a Castro sycophant, claims a grand total of six casualties for this Caribbean Verdun. Your humble servant here interviewed several eye-witnesses (on both sides) to this “battle” and their consensus came to about five casualties total for this Caribbean Iwo Jima.

True to New York Times– form, during this “battle,” they didn’t have a reporter within 300 miles of Santa Clara.  Instead they relied on their trusty Cuban Castroite “correspondents.”

Read the rest here: The New York Times — Defending Murderous Dictators Since Walter Duranty

UPDATE – an interesting article from seven years ago about Walter Duranty – Pulizter Winning Lies.

Che Guevara: Progressive Killer

by Phantom Ace ( 246 Comments › )
Filed under Communism, Progressives at December 3rd, 2009 - 9:46 pm

Ernesto Che Guevara is admired by the Progressives all over the world. They have turned him into a icon. He is nothing but a killer and a loser. He was an Argentine reject who went to Cuba to buddy up with the Castro brothers. After the revolution, he had many killed without mercy. He was no hero but a thug.

Che-mao

HOLLYWOOD history is often nonsensical, but film-makers usually have the good sense not to whitewash killers and sadists. Steven Soderbergh’s new film about Che Guevara, however, does that, and more.

Che the revolutionary romantic, as depicted by Benecio del Toro in Soderbergh’s film, never existed. That hero of the Left, with his hippie hair and beard, an image now iconic on T-shirts and coffee mugs around the world, is a myth concocted by Fidel Castro’s propagandists – something of a cross between Don Quixote and Robin Hood.

Read the rest.

He was also a failure. He didn’t succeed in the Congo and suffered the best outcome for any Progressive thug. He went to Bolivia and tried to start revolution there. The Bolivian people didn’t fall for his Hope and Change lie and the result was he got the fate he deserved.

Dead Che

My question is why do Progressives admire this loser?