► Show Top 10 Hot Links

Posts Tagged ‘Clarice Feldman’

Now is the Wintour of our discontent; and Obama’s third rate performance

by Mojambo ( 93 Comments › )
Filed under Barack Obama, Democratic Party, Elections, Elections 2012, Politics at June 11th, 2012 - 2:00 pm

Anyone catch that Anna “The Devil Wears Prada” Wintour ad for Barack Obama? The woman could barely even look into the camera – that’s how haughty she is.  I have read that she will fire people for trying to make casual conversation with her in the elevator. If ever there was evidence about how clueless the Obama campaign is, that is it.

by Clarice Feldman

Back at my favorite boîte, in a dark  back  booth I was scanning the news clips of the week and watching TV while waiting for lunch.  Greg Gutfeld’s take on the Wisconsin recall election made me laugh out loud:

“The media wanted Norma Rae, and got On the Waterfront, instead.”

The entire week was full of things like this, signs of a campaign on the rocks.

Even before the Wisconsin drubbing ,the campaign damaged itself by running the video ad by Vogue editor Anna (The Devil Wears Prada) Wintour, soliciting contributions  to a fundraising dinner for Obama.

In a very upper class British accent, wearing thousands of dollars worth of couture garb and stylishly, which is to say expensively, groomed, Wintour’s suggestion that she, her co-host  Sex and the City’s Sarah Jessica Parker and those paying thousands of dollars to attend were just thrilled at the thought of sitting next to and listening to  a nobody who won a place at the table by a lucky $3 bet in the lottery was  parody fodder.

Iowahawk archly summed it up in one of his tweets:

“Rejoice, you bitter clingy filthy flyover hillbillies. Thanks to the Obama campaign, you finally have a chance to live the dream of every American: rubbing elbows with chic lefty fashionistas. Desiccated Eurotrash Vogue editor Anna Wintour explains it for you in what will go down in history as the WORST CAMPAIGN AD EVER.”

[…..]

MOTUS detailed the Obamas’ schedule on a typical day and it’s clear the only job they care about saving is the President’s.   They are in a desperate scramble for both money and votes.

How desperate?

My friend Matt e-mailed:

“I have it on good word from the secret Romney Axis of Evil HQ that the next Obama ads are going to feature Alec Baldwin touting a seat on AF One, Michael Moore offering a bit role in his next fauxcumentary and Paris Hilton offering a ride in her limousine to the next White House soiree.”

By chance, the same Democratic biggies who were in the restaurant last week, slid into the booth next to mine just as my meal arrived. They’d obviously been drinking at the bar before the table was ready for them because they were speaking even more loudly than usual and were completely unguarded.

“The White House is killing us. Killing us. One stupid move after another,”

“Clinton worked damned hard to get us out from under  the Tax and Spend party label and now that dope has it padlocked tight  round our neck again.”

“Ed Rendell and Bill Clinton can hardly contain themselves. They’ve practically joined the Romney campaign. If only it wasn’t too late to dump him.”

“What he has he done right? In my part of the country after he put the kibosh on Keystone I couldn’t even buy him votes.”

“Remember when they met with us and told us not to worry? They had it under control. ..they were going to bump off Rush with Air America.” (A loud groan escaped the group.)

“Then there was the Coffee Party to undermine the tea party.” (This time a laugh went up.)  “And then,” the person speaking began sobbing as he continued, “Occupy Wall Street was supposed to take attention away from us and put the blame on the rich.” I guess pooping on cop cars and raping college kids was not a big selling point with voters.

When they got to Wisconsin, the whole table was disconsolate. “‘Double Down!’ that moron Rich Trumka said, ‘Double Down.'”

“Yeah, we doubled down all right. We worked together with Mr. Double Down Trumka on getting out street protestors.  We worked on occupying the state capitol, harassing the Governor and legislature.  We ran off and hid in Illinois to block the Walker initiatives.  We went all in for the judicial elections ,backing an utter twit, and then challenged them and demanded a recount which we were sure to lose and we  lost again.   And then, the most beautiful thing of all,” the operative said, choking on the words, “we worked our butts off to get a recall election. Went house to house, Canvassed.  Got thousands of names on petitions — many of them phony  but still names on a petition.  We called to get out the votes, and Walker wins again.  The Wisconsin GOP controls the state house, the supreme court, the house, and while it might possibly have lost the majority seat in the senate, that body’s not meeting again until next year when they surely will regain control of both houses again. Double down. Now Double Down is out of money for the 2012 election there and the White House who told us to work with him expects us to get more money from a state where they think we are profligate campaign spenders and idiot sore losers. Good luck with that. Even my first grade neighbor pointed at me and laughed when I took down the Barrett signs on the front lawn. Kid even handed me a  Walker button.”

“Well, they’re finally getting voter ID so look at the bright side, in November’s election you won’t have to run all those buses from Chicago into Racine and Kenosha and Milwaukee.” A really loud moan went up.

“Hey. I hope you guys don’t think I’m crazy or anything, but it’s hard for me to believe anyone in the White House could really be this stupid. I’m starting to think he wants to destroy the party.”

[…..]

“Seriously. I think he’s a GOP Manchurian candidate.  All of a sudden we’re losing independents, Jewish donors aren’t returning my phone calls. Don’t even mention Catholic voters. They’re going to march against ObamaCare next. I mean why not insult them unnecessarily — they are only one-fourth of the voters?”

“ObamaCare. How many days before the Supremes throw that piece of horse pucky out? A week? Two?”

“All of a sudden the other side is making sense in  arguments on religious liberty and states’ rights and people are calling for free markets and less regulation..this after we spent years and — how much? — getting schools to dump civics classes and media to hire constitutional nitwits to make voters  ignorant of such things. He must be a GOP plant. There’s no other explanation.”

“How can we tell if that theory is right?” a skeptic at their table asked.

“I’ve got it,” said a guy  who had remained silent so far. “Let’s suggest he hire Bob Shrum.  If he takes that advice we have proof positive he’s working for the enemy.”

Read the rest – The Wintour of our discontent

This time though I think we  are going to give the Obamabots the fight of their lives because as  Peter Wehner has writes ” at almost every level, the Republican Party in 2012 is sharper and better than the Republican Party in 2008, ……… [T] he other thing  is that President Obama is a much different, and inferior, candidate to what he was four years ago.

by Peter Wehner

The Republican National Committee (RNC) is out with an ad that immediately jumps on President Obama’s statement earlier today that “the private sector is doing fine.” The president’s assertion raises the question–just what planet is Obama living on? And the RNC ad is a good one. But what this episode reveals are two things of more lasting significance.

The first is that at almost every level, the Republican Party in 2012 is sharper and better than the Republican Party in 2008. Campaigns develop a rhythm and pace of their own – and so far, the Romney campaign and the RNC are easily outdueling the Obama campaign and the Democratic National Committee (DNC). We saw evidence of this earlier this week, when the GOP’s get-out-the-vote effort in Wisconsin far exceeded what the Democratic Party was able to do.

The other thing this clip highlights is that President Obama is a much different, and inferior, candidate to what he was four years ago.

Some of that has to do with the fact that in 2008, Obama was able to run against an incumbent party that was out of favor, while today he’s forced to defend a record of almost unmitigated failure. But apart from that, the Obama campaign in general – at this point at least – is out of sorts. It’s far less sharp, more off stride, and less skilled and in touch with the mood of the public now than in 2008.

[……]

At this stage, the state of the economy — which will have a huge impact on the election — is increasingly beyond Obama’s control. But even those things Obama can control — namely, his performance and the performance of his team — show signs of being third-rate. This cannot be reassuring to the president or his party. Unless Obama gets his act together relatively soon, and relatively quickly, he might want to prepare to attend the unveiling of his White House portrait at an event hosted by Mitt Romney three years from now.

Read the rest – Team Obama’s Third Rate Performance

 

The week from hell

by Mojambo ( 91 Comments › )
Filed under Barack Obama, Blogmocracy, Dhimmitude, Guest Post, Politics at August 22nd, 2010 - 5:30 pm

I always cringe when people like Bill O’Reilly constantly tout the “Obama is a smart guy” line. No he is not smart, he is a bit too clever for his own good and I have noticed that no matter what job he holds, he always seems to be looking to his next job. Maybe he can be The Leader of the One World Government in 2016.  As far as this Mosque thing goes, I think it has reawakened the passions on the arrogant entitlement nature of Islam that may have been laying dormant since the Iraq war went bad.

by Clarice Feldman

The week began for Obama with him basking in the love of his invited guests at a White House Iftar dinner and ended with his party in disarray, his political fortunes plunging even further, and his sixth (Michelle’s seventh) lavish vacation of the season imperiled by floating poop.

Iftar
Celebrating Iftar at the White House, the president, as is his wont, made ridiculous panders to the audience, suggesting Islam had contributed much to this country since its creation and  suggesting by both word and tone that he supported the building of the Cordoba House mosque near the ruins of the World Trade Center.

[…]

a. Cordoba House, aka Park-51
There is something peculiar about the way Democrats think we ought to memorialize the worst attack on American soil, an attack by nineteen Moslems, supported by their fellow religionists and certainly some Moslem countries. (Gallup’s latest survey indicates that 7% of the Moslem world hates us — that’s 80 million people.) While we pay the high costs for this attack, both in rebuilding the ruins and compensating those who suffered it, but as well in daily inconveniences in public buildings, transport, and higher military defense costs, so many on the left — which, face it, is now synonymous with the Democratic Party — think we ought to use these sacred spots to reach out and touch our enemies, gestures which in those places are seen only as weakness.

[…]

(b) The Storm that followed
The double lutz triple mosque spin by Obama had hardly been completed when the politicians of all stripes and voters weighed in, and the fancy footwork was not getting the kind of score the president apparently thought it would. Instead, it started a battle which continues to erode his support his party’s. (Some nutters in the Moslem world abroad have suggested the whole thing is really a Zionist plot, but I’m beginning to think Obama himself is a Republican plant designed to bring the mainstream media hacks, who promoted him into office and continue to cover his behind, and his own party into such ignominy that they may never recover.)

The issue to anyone who is an adult is not the legal right to build a mosque in that part of the city, nor the right to freedom of religion; it is the propriety of building a thirteen-story mosque within the very area hit with the debris of the attack.

People who have no problem attacking Israelis for building apartments on their own land in Jerusalem, opposing energy companies for surface mining and constructing generating facilities, and denying even the right to smoke in one’s one home and car are suddenly championing private property rights. People who would require that Catholic doctors and hospitals perform abortions, that kosher butchering be made illegal, and that Mormons be boycotted for opposing gay marriage are now championing religious freedom. You  really can’t make up this stuff.

[…]

(c ) Nostalgia for George Bush
Maureen Dowd begged George Bush to weigh in on the matter and save Obama’s bacon…er…hide. So did Eugene Robinson, and Peter Beinart wrote that he was feeling nostalgic for the former president.

So were the residents of Martha’s Vineyard (Obama vacation spot) where Bush (“Miss Me Yet?”) T-shirts were outselling pro-Obama ones.

[…]

And while it wasn’t likely nostalgia for Bush, Obama managed to wee-wee up all of Los Angeles with security blockades as he attended a fundraiser for Barabara Boxer in Hancock Park, a fundraiser where two of the sponsors, Barbara Streisand and Jeffrey Katzensberg, were no-shows.

When you’ve lost Barbra and Jeff…

By week’s end, the president, his approval ratings scraping bottom, made it to Martha’s Vineyard in time to learn that Tisbury Great Pond, which fronts on the expensive rental vacation estate they are staying at, is contaminated with coliform fecal  bacteria.

It was a week where everything around Obama turned to merde.

[…]

Read the rest here: Looking for love in all the wrong places


Addendum by Huckfunn


Blogmocracy in Action!
Guest post by: Huckfunn!


AP shills for Barrak Hussein Obama

The Associated Press doesn’t want its readers to be confused about the proposed “Ground Zero Mosque”. Therefore, AP Deputy Managing Commissar for Standards and Production, Tom Kent, issued a directive that the term “Ground Zero Mosque” should be avoided in future articles and the following terms be used in lieu thereof:

_ mosque 2 blocks from WTC site
_ Muslim (or Islamic) center near WTC site
_ mosque near ground zero
_ mosque near WTC site

Additionally, the Abominable Press reminds its minions to toe the line as to President Obama’s position on the Non-Ground Zero Mosque:

Here is a succinct summary of President Obama’s position:
Obama has said he believes Muslims have the right to build an Islamic center in New York as a matter of religious freedom, though he’s also said he won’t take a position on whether they should actually build it.

Succinct? Are you kidding? Does anyone really believe that O-hole’s position on the Anything-Else-But-Ground-Zero Mosque is succinct? By the way; is he Hindu or Lutheran? He’s so “nuanced”, ya know.

Read the whole sorry thing here.

– Huckfunn