► Show Top 10 Hot Links

Posts Tagged ‘conservatism’

54% of Texas Hispanics are Conservative

by Phantom Ace ( 82 Comments › )
Filed under Democratic Party, Elections 2010, Liberal Fascism, Politics, Polls, Progressives, Republican Party at February 24th, 2010 - 5:30 pm

The Progressive Media has been hyping that Texas will turn into a Democratic State. The basis for this assumption is the growing Hispanic population in that state. Well a new Poll comes out that throws cold water on this theory. More than half of Texas Hispanics call themselves Conservative. This doesn’t surprise me as I have encountered many of my Tejano (Hispanic Texans) cousins and they are even more Conservative than I, especially on social issues. Texas is one of those states where discussing social issues works in the GOP’s favor. This is drawing many Tejanos into the Right and rejecting the Totalitarian Progressive Movement and their attempts to enslave them.

AUSTIN – A bent to conservatism and family makes Hispanics a promising pool of votes for Republicans, but the party’s targeting of illegal immigrants has withered its attraction.

Regardless, Gov. Rick Perry has fared relatively well, perhaps because of his anti-Washington rhetoric and his careful immigration stance, a recent poll indicates.

It shows more than half of Texas Hispanics call themselves conservative, and a surprising 23 percent say they might participate in Tuesday’s GOP primary. Among those, Perry leads Sen. Kay Bailey Hutchison by 2 to 1, according to the poll, commissioned by an Austin consultant for a national group of Hispanic legislative leaders.

Read the rest here: More than half of Hispanics identify as conservative, poll finds

With control of the Education system, the Left has erased the true history of Hispanics. Instead they emphasize victimhood and teach us that we are inferior to whites. Thankfully, in my case my Spaniard Grandfather taught me about the 700 year Resistance to Arab Aggression  and how for 150 year the Spanish Empire had the world by the balls. This gave me pride and lead me to reject the slave mentality that many of my fellow Hispanics have. This is why I despise Progressives, because it is personal to me. They lied about my history and view me as inferior. They only racially insult any Rightwing Hispanic like Marco Rubio, who doesn’t accept subservient status.

The article of course downplays the findings by claiming that 70% define themselves as Democrats. This doesn’t mean anything, remember the Reagan Democrats? They were White Catholics who, although Democrats, voted for Reagan in 1980 and 1984. Many switched to the GOP and their Children also vote Republican. Hispanics are no different. Contrary to the racist Progressive myth the Hispanic experience is closer to the White Catholic one, than the Black experience in America. We are an immigrant group and like all before want to achieve the American dream. The Totalitarian Progressives  don’t want Hispanics to succeed. They want us to live in Ghettos and be their serfs as they have tried to do to Blacks. Well I have news for the racist Left, it isn’t going to happen!

Conservatism Rising

by Mojambo ( 255 Comments › )
Filed under Barack Obama, Democratic Party, Elections 2010, Politics, Republican Party at January 21st, 2010 - 8:00 am

Yes reports of the death of conservatism (so gleefully touted by certain bloggers and pundits) are greatly exaggerated.  What was rejected in 2006 and 2008 was “compassionate conservatism” which is liberalism in a different colored suit. Why vote for a pseudo liberal when you can vote for the real deal? The vast majority of the times when the public is offered a choice between a loony leftist (not counting obviously whacko places like Vermont,  San Francisco, etc.) and a level headed, non hardcore ideological, conservative who wants to keep taxes low, promotes individual freedom, keeping government small but efficient, religious freedom, spending controlled, criminals pursued and our streets safe, a color-blind society with no preferences for any special interest group, appointing judges who do not legislate from the bench, and our country safe – the conservative will win. The problem has been the GOP Establishment which continues to foist people such as John McCain, Colin Powell, Poppy Bush on the party and the false perception that the Bible thumpers such as Mike Huckabee (a phony populist) and Pat Robertson (permanently stuck on stupid) call the shots (which if the Religious Right really did we never would have wound up with a McCain).

by Andrew Foy and Brenton Stransky

In the wake of Scott Brown’s historic Senate run, we would like to put the last eighteen months of politics into perspective and summarize what the Massachusetts race means for the future of conservatism. Despite what may be written in the Liberal press, this race represents much more than just a case of a “good” candidate versus a “bad” candidate, and it is far more profound than a case of “populism and anti-establishment tensions run amok.” What this race means for the country is simple, and its results can be summarized as a clear refutation of the liberal agenda in favor of the conservative position.

If the above thesis is correct, then we must answer the following question: “If the liberal agenda is being so clearly refuted in favor of the conservative position, then why did Democrats win so handily in the 2006 and 2008 elections?” We think the answer is clear. In 2006 and 2008, the Democrats didn’t win by running a liberal agenda against a conservative agenda; they won by running squarely against a president and party whose policies were neither popular nor conservative.

Bush and his Republican administration greatly expanded the power of government along with the welfare state, doubled the national budget, doubled the deficit, signed the largest entitlement bill since the 1960s, regulated carbon dioxide as a “pollutant,” signed Sarbanes-Oxley and the steel tariffs, helped promote the expansion of huge federally-sponsored entities Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac in order to appear “compassionate” to people who needed home loans — and when the housing market inevitably crashed due to years of poor government policies, he proposed hundreds of billions in federal aid to various private and public entities and handed out billions in economic “stimulus” checks.

Under the above conditions, it is reasonable to ask, “How could a candidate running in opposition to these policies lose?” We don’t think he could, unless he advocated for an agenda even more radical than and to the left of the above policies. After the 2008 presidential race between John McCain and Barack Obama, multiple pundits proudly claimed that “conservatism is dead.” However, unlike the aforementioned pundits, we did not view the 2008 presidential race as a battle between conservative and liberal policies, with liberalism/progressivism ultimately winning the battle of ideas. To the contrary, such a battle was never fought at all.

The 2008 election contest was really decided on the day the markets crashed. At once, Obama and the Democrats squarely pointed the finger of blame at Bush, the Republicans, and the policies mentioned above. At the time, it did not matter what was the exact mechanism which caused the housing collapse and subsequent market crash. It did not matter whether the Bush policies were conservative or not. It did not matter how much Democratic policies played into the mix (in a previous article, we outlined how policies initiated under the Clinton White House laid the foundation for the collapse). The public was deeply concerned with the economic situation, and it was quite natural under those circumstances to gravitate toward the party not in power. Further, Barack Obama ran on a very moderate agenda and on some issues (e.g., deficit reduction), he could have been viewed as conservative. Barack Obama and the Democrats offered change, and under the conditions at the time, “change” sounded damned good. McCain offered the same thing, but with less charisma and less legitimacy, considering his ties to the previous administration. Under these conditions, McCain and the Republicans lost, and conservatism was written off as dead.

What a difference a year makes!

Read the rest here.

Republican Scozzafava Suspends NY Congressional Campaign

by Kafir ( 445 Comments › )
Filed under Elections, Politics at October 31st, 2009 - 9:36 am
Some good news this morning:
dedescoz
Republican Scozzafava Suspends New York Congressional Campaign

Republican state Assemblywoman Dierdre Scozzafava has suspended her campaign for upstate New York’s 23rd Congressional seat, giving a possible boost to Conservative Party nominee Doug Hoffman against Democrat Bill Owens, Fox News has confirmed.

The move comes on the heels of a new poll that showed Scozzafava had fallen behind her two competitors in a race too close.

The special election is Tuesday and political analysts believe upstate New York is a preview of the races in 2010 and 2012 as Republican leaders struggle to rebuild, redefine and regain control of Washington.

The Siena College poll has Owens picking up 36 percent of the vote, while Hoffman has 35 percent. Scozzafava has 20 percent, with nine percent of voters undecided.

Will the RNC endorse Hoffman or Owens now? Sad question, but things that make you go hhmmmm…

(many thanks to typicalwhitey for the link!)

Some Thoughts on the Van Jones Resignation

by tqcincinnatus ( 199 Comments › )
Filed under Politics at September 6th, 2009 - 7:00 am

It’s big, big news.  This is important stuff, and I mean beyond just the obvious fact that it keeps a raving, racist, anti-American, truther looney-tune from having control of billions of dollars of taxpayer monies, that is….

This is politically damaging to the Democrats and to Obama in a massive way.  Because he put him into office, Van Jones = Barack Obama.  Jones wouldn’t have been there had Obama not sidestepped the constitutional vetting process and installed him into a non-constitutional office where he would be in a position to affect how our money is spent and how our lives are regulated.  The potential damage that an openly racist whackjob could have done is damage that Obama opened us all up to by his poor choice. 

This calls Obama’s judgment into question.  As Hot Air via Ace of Spades reminded us, the one thing that was supposed to convince us all to vote for Obama despite his questionable past and his onion paper thin resumé was his vaunted “judgment.”  Guess where his judgment got us? 

Hopefully, this debacle will call the whole process of installing unelected, non-confirmable “Czars” into executive positions into question.  We heard rumblings of it from Robert Byrd, who as a left-winger in a conservative state, was probably getting an earful from his constituents as to why this cuckoo’s nest ever happened in the first place.  If nothing else, Van Jones may end up having been a sacrificial wolf that helped start the movement to force our legislators and executive branch to actually obey the Constitution once again.

This debacle also shows the power that conservative media can have, when we all get on the same page and start hammering home the truth.  ABCNNBCBS, MSNBC, and the rest of the left-wing near-oligopoly on broadcast media were basically AWOL on reporting the news of Van Jones’ past.  They didn’t want to touch it, since it looked bad for a guy they supported.  You can bet that if this had been a Republican President nominating a conservative with even 1/100 the baggage, the MSM would have been all over it like flies on a cowpaddy.  Instead, the job was left to Fox News, Glenn Beck, and conservative blogs like Gateway Pundit, Ace of Spades, LGF 2.0, and others (please forgive me if I’m missing any), as well as news dissemination sites like Free Republic.  Each deserves a hearty round of applause for scoring a victory for the Republic against the forces of evil!

And this brings us to the obvious left-wing talking point meme that is going to be spreading around the internet today: the evil right-wing has (re)discovered that horrible, terrible personal charactre attacks work.  Those evil right-wingers!

Sorry, but no.  We were simply doing the job that Congress could have done if Obama hadn’t been trying to sneak this guy under the radar in a patently unconstitutional fashion.  Just as importantly, we need to understand that charactre counts for something.  If you have a guy who has repeatedly made anti-American statements, said he is fighting American efforts overseas, thinks his own government perpetrated the worst terrorist attack ever on US soil, constantly says that white people dump toxic waste in black neighbourhoods alng with other wacky racist conspiracy theories, and associates with open and avowed Communists, then common sense says this guy doesn’t belong in any position of authority within the American government.  That’s not a smear campaign, that’s called “common sense.”    A guy who has spent his whole adult life undermining America and helping to set Americans against each other doesn’t deserve to be in the American government.

In short, the defeat of Van Jones is not just a victory for the GOP (who didn’t do a whole lot, btw) or for the conservative blogs and Fox News.  It is a victory for America, for common sense and simple decency.  It is proof positive that there are still at least some people in this nation capable of thinking rationally, instead of just twisting around and going whichever way the winds blow.  The defeat of Van Jones shows that the old America, the America of the Founders, the America of the greatest generation, isn’t dead yet. 

As John Dryden versed, “Beware the fury of a patient man.”

That’s what Van Jones’ defeat was – he was correct when he identified his opponents as “opponents of health care reform.”  They were, and are also opponents of:  massive federal debts, ridiculous spending waste of the taxpayers’ money, the assaults on our civil liberties, and the attempts by radical left-wingers to overturn all mores and traditions in this country.  In short, Obama and Co. have woken the sleeping giant – the conservative majority who slept through the “opportunity” to vote for McCain. 

And the GOP will reap benefits from all this, even though they basically didn’t do anything w.r.t Van Jones.  If the Obama administration and the Democrats in Congress keep going in the direction they are, 2010 will be a magnificent election for the GOP.  Let’s just hope they can come up with another Contract with America-type manifesto to rally the troops around.  Even as it is, simply riding along on autopilot has the Republicans consistently ahead in generic Congressional balloting.  Just think where they could be if they actually did something!

To summarise, once again, kudos and a shoutout to everyone involved in bringing Van Jones down!  Score one for the Republic!