► Show Top 10 Hot Links

Posts Tagged ‘Debt Crisis’

Today’s Press Conference From Obama? You’ve Guessed It, More Snake Oil.

by Flyovercountry ( 87 Comments › )
Filed under Barack Obama, Democratic Party, Economy, Politics at July 11th, 2011 - 8:00 pm

Today, Barack Obama announced yet again, he believes it is time to get something done regarding our looming debt train wreck.  His proposal, well let’s just say that it reminds me of one of my favorite memories from my childhood.  Every year, for the beginning of the fall season, I would eagerly await the Peanuts cartoon where Lucy Van Pelt would offer Charlie Brown a crack at kicking the football.  Each year, I would read in anticipation of Charlie finally connecting, and each year, along with Chuck, I would be disappointed.  In his last year of writing the popular strip, Charles M. Schultz stated in an interview that he gave serious thought to allowing Charlie to attain his goal during what was to be his last crack at kicking the ball.  It was not in the cards however, as once again, Lucy would succumb to her inevitable nature.

Obama’s offered proposal?  He promises to lower spending later, if we give him a tax increase now.  For those of you who need a visual representation of this deal, I’ll repeat it for you now, in an easier to understand visual form.

The new taxes of course will be on top of the 11 new taxes which were signed into law as a part of the Affordable Health Care Act.

Taxpayer cost over 10 years: $210 billion.
• Also starting in 2013 is a 2.3% excise tax on medical device manufacturers and importers. That’s estimated to raise $20 billion.
• Already underway this year is the new annual fee on “branded” drug makers and importers, which will raise $27 billion.
• Another $15.2 billion will come from raising the floor on allowable medical deductions to 10% of adjusted gross income from 7.5%.
• Starting in 2018, the bill imposes a whopping 40% “excise tax” on high-cost health insurance plans. Though it only applies to two years in the 2010-2019 window of ObamaCare’s original budget score, this tax would still raise $32 billion—and much more in future years.
• And don’t forget a new annual fee on health insurance providers starting in 2014 and estimated to raise $60 billion. This tax, like many others on this list, will be passed along to consumers in higher health-care costs.

Lost in this discussion of what the attainment of the decades long goal of the Democrat party means to our nation, is the actual facts of what will in deed happen. The goal of course was to spend our country into oblivion. Congratulations Democrats, you made it happen. So, here we are today, and these two trains are going to wreck. What is going to be the result.

1. We will not default on our debt. According to current law, our debt will be the first thing paid.

2. It will result in a defacto balanced budget amendment that about 60% of the country believes is a good idea. (While most Americans agree with the concept of a balanced budget amendment, they do not agree with number 3 of this list. Unfortunately, our elected leaders have done a terrible job in explaining the basic math involved with their magic programs. 70% of Americans who want a balanced budget, want to have this happen without cutting entitlement spending, which is impossible.)

3. Since entitlement spending in our country is currently, (and this factoid by the way serves as the greatest proof of the failure of the Socialist agenda which is now choking the life from our country,) $260 Billion more than our revenues at their highest point in our nation’s history, our defacto balanced budget amendment will cause a mandatory decrease in entitlement spending.

4. The current President, who presided over an 83% increase in discretionary spending over the last two years, along with adding over $1.5 Trillion in new entitlement spending, will be forced to pull out a machete, and not a scalpel in order to determine which programs would be actually paid for. (Since the money would not be in existence to continue anything which required any type of credit. Also, his role would still be on an equal footing with the current House.)

During his presser today, the President, beyond saying, “let me be clear,” for the thousandth time also stated that he is in fact now ready to lead the two sides to a compromise. For those of you who have not figured this out yet, compromise in the liberal speak language boils down to this, it means that the President want the Republicans in the House to now give up their position and accept a crappy deal which would make it look like they got something while in practice, they would have capitulated to more spending, and increased taxation. Sure, the promise of lowering spending later on down the road would be there, but…………..

At this point by the way, I would just like to point out that the Pelosi led House did not produce a single budget for her entire 4 years as Speaker. That by the way is the only constitutionally mandated unique duty of the House of Representatives. The House under John Boehner has produced a budget, but the President, and his party apparatchiks in the Senate have failed to address the budget issue. where has his leadership been on the budget issue for his entire term so far. Perhaps if we wrote our budget down somewhere, we could have avoided this entire mess.

Kudos by the way to John Boehner, for standing tough so far in this fight. He has been vilified by the left, and even more viciously vilified by the right. The left hates him because he is a conservative, and that is all that the left needs to validate their blind hatred. The right is still mad at conservative leaders in days past who found themselves at a similar crossroads and sold us out. Perhaps Boehner will be the first Republican to tell Lucy to buzz off. Maybe he will be the first to not go for the, “this time I’ll let you kick it,” gag.

Cross Posted at Musings of a Mad Conservative.

Little Timmy Geitner Reads The 14th Amendment, And Shows Off His Disdain For The Intelligence Of All Americans.

by Flyovercountry ( 77 Comments › )
Filed under Economy, Progressives, Socialism at July 9th, 2011 - 11:30 am

So our Treasury Secretary took to the T.V. shows yesterday to chime in on his view of the crushing debt his team has run up during his tenure as our nation’s top financial executive. Yes, this is the same man that despite the fact that even by our President’s own admission during his transition into being President, was a know tax cheat, and in fact guilty of a crime which would have sent either you or me to prison, he was the only person in America smart enough to be our Treasury Secretary. (This completely discounts by the way the almost useless fact that indeed there has been a bevy of Treasury Secretaries for 235 years, most of whom held the post before the only man in America up to the task was even born.) On T.V., he read a part of Section IV of the Fourteenth Amendment. He changed the context of his reading for us, and did nothing to hide the fact that he was changing that context, and used it as an argument that our President was entitled to completely trash any semblance of the checks and balances system which have served us so well for 235 years. The Fourteenth Amendment and Geitner’s interpretation follow.

AmendmentXIV.
Passed by Congress June 13, 1866. Ratified July 9, 1868.
(Note: Article I, Section 2 of the Constitution was modified by
Section 2 of the 14th Amendment.)
SECTION 1.
All persons born or naturalized in the United States and
subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United
States and of the State wherein they reside. No State shall
make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges
or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall
any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property,
without due process of law; nor deny to any person within
its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.
SECTION 2.
Representatives shall be apportioned among the several
States according to their respective numbers, counting the
whole number of persons in each State, excluding Indians
not taxed. But when the right to vote at any election for
the choice of electors for President and Vice President of
the United States, Representatives in Congress, the Executive
and Judicial officers of a State, or the members of the
Legislature thereof, is denied to any of the male inhabitants
of such State, [being twenty-one years of age,]* and
citizens of the United States, or in any way abridged, except
for participation in rebellion, or other crime, the basis of
representation therein shall be reduced in the proportion
which the number of such male citizens shall bear to the
whole number of male citizens twenty-one years of age in
such State.
SECTION 3.
No person shall be a Senator or Representative in Congress,
or elector of President and Vice President, or hold
any office, civil or military, under the United States, or
under any State, who, having previously taken an oath, as a
member of Congress, or as an officer of the United States,
or as a member of any State legislature, or as an executive
or judicial officer of any State, to support the Constitution
of the United States, shall have engaged in insurrection or
rebellion against the same, or given aid or comfort to the
enemies thereof. But Congress may by a vote of two-thirds
of each House, remove such disability.
SECTION 4.
The validity of the public debt of the United States, authorized
by law, including debts incurred for payment of
pensions and bounties for services in suppressing insurrection
or rebellion, shall not be questioned. But neither the
United States nor any State shall assume or pay any debt
or obligation incurred in aid of insurrection or rebellion
against the United States, or any claim for the loss or emancipation
of any slave; but all such debts, obligations and
claims shall be held illegal and void.
SECTION 5.
The Congress shall have the power to enforce, by appropriate
legislation, the provisions of this article.
*Changed by Section 1 of the 26th Amendment.
13

A couple of points, first, I am no fan of the Fourteenth Amendment. While it had its uses in the 40 years post civil war, ie. granting citizenship to former slaves, allowing us to stiff the nations who sided against the Union and provided support to the Confederacy, insured that Union soldiers would not be voted out of their pension rights by Democrat majorities in Southern States, it has also landed us with the concept of anchor babies, and now according to Timmy Geitner the ability of our President to declare financial martial law. Bear in mind though, Tim needed to have you ignore part of his reading of the Amendment, and place extra emphasis on another in order to grant these extraordinary power to his boss.

SECTION 4.
The validity of the public debt of the United States, authorized
by law, including debts incurred for payment of
pensions and bounties for services in suppressing insurrection
or rebellion, shall not be questioned. But neither the
United States nor any State shall assume or pay any debt
or obligation incurred in aid of insurrection or rebellion
against the United States, or any claim for the loss or emancipation
of any slave; but all such debts, obligations and
claims shall be held illegal and void.

Two things about his argument, one, public debt as authorized by law. This does not include authority to incur new debt, which is what raising the debt limit would do. We can still pay off our old debt without incurring new debt. This is the concept which befuddles our Executive Branch, since it involves a cessation of their power. This remedy includes them to stop spending money that they don’t have on things which we do not need nor can we afford. The solution necessitates the change of our current statutory spending, meaning entitlements. The phrase given extra importance, why of course it was the one that said, shall not be questioned. Mr. Geitner, the smartest guy in the room has just ended a pesky little piece of our Constitutional form of governance referred to as the checks and balances system. Good thing too, I was getting tired of not having a king. Who did Timmy establish as our king? Why it’s Barack Obama, the least qualified person in any room he enters, that’s who.

More over, the fourteenth Amendment does not alter or remove Article I, Section 7. It does not alter or remove Article I, Section 8. Section 7 states that any matter of spending must originate in the House of Representatives. Section 8 confirms the House’s control of the purse strings and indeed the House’s duty to determine how debts will be repaid. Further, I love how the leftists will argue that our Constitution is no longer relevant, and that our founding fathers actually never really wanted to build a framework which would serve to limit the power and scope of authority of a ruling elite. Then when the mood strikes them, they will attempt to use the Constitution as a means to show us how it actually serves as a map to inflict growing amounts of dictatorial powers which had somehow escaped the notice of previous elected leaders. There is a reason why the Tea Parties have been springing up across this great nation. Americans, especially those of us who can remember a free society, and how well we did prior to an infliction of totalitarian authority do not wish to travel down this path.

Cross Posted at Musings of a Mad Conservative.

Why Even Have A Debt Limit?

by Flyovercountry ( 108 Comments › )
Filed under Economy at July 5th, 2011 - 11:00 am

A reader asked me to write about the debt ceiling again.  I will admit to a sinking feeling, like I really did not want to do it.  Not only because I already have, and half of the bloggers on the internet have, and not only because it has been a topic of debate on every news format T.V. and radio program, and not only because any politician who knows how to find a bank of microphones and cameras has found a way to chime in on this, complete non issue, but because the topic is like watching a train wreck.  I live in north east Ohio, somewhat close to Bellevue.  For those of you who do not know, Bellevue, Ohio is the largest rail switch yard in the country, maybe even the world.  Trains are very heavy critters.  Momentum for those who skipped science class is calculated my multiplying mass by velocity.  Anyone who has ever been in an auto accident can tell you about momentum.  Sometimes, when a train wreck is about to occur, people might know for 15 minutes prior, and still be unable to do a damn thing about it.  A bad decision might put two opposite bound trains on the same track, and momentum does the rest.  But, like our might example the train, I will allow my momentum to make a few logical observations.

Why do we have a debt limit?  We have drawn this imaginary line in the stratosphere and exclaimed that we would make it illegal for ourselves to take on any more debt than that.  So, as we approach it, naturally we raise the limit.  It has gotten to the point now that we are talking about the next increase even before we max out our current so called limit.  So, why do we have one?  Why play this sadistic game with ourselves?  Why not just admit that we are going to keep borrowing money, just like Greece, until our creditors cut us off?  Really, what is the bloody point?

Why get mad at China?  For those who have not heard me state this before, let me make it clear.  China has only done what we, as a nation, asked them to do.  Yes, China holds 30% of our debt, and that situation is bad in so many ways.  China is hardly a friendly nation, and they delight in using North Korea and their tin pot little dictator as a thorn in our side.  China is a trade partner who views us as an economic enemy to be vanquished, and with time, China will learn the benefit of a free economic system complete with full property rights, but for now, they are still overrun by former communists.  Don’t confuse that however with the real issue of them holding our debt, the fault for that catastrophe is strictly ours.  We went to them and asked them to loan us the money, not the other way around.

I read a particularly depressing poll today which stated that Americans are for balancing the budget, but not if it means we need to cut entitlement spending.  When did we stop teaching basic math in our public schools?  Really, I know a lot of teachers, and I truly like them all.  I think the world of them, but if a majority of Americans believe we can balance the budget without taking a very huge machete to the area of spending known as entitlements, then all I can say is that collectively, every school teacher in the country has failed to educate the American Public at large.  67% of what our government spends is spent as a matter of law, and falls under the realm of entitlements.  40% of what our government spends is borrowed money.  If every penny of non entitlement spending were to end tomorrow, we would still be borrowing 10.4% of every dollar spent.  That means, if we shut down the post office, fired everyone in the military and said no more national defense, closed the EPA, fired the FBI, stopped the Department of Education, Labor, HHS, Interior, Treasury, Interior, etc……, we would still be $260 Billion short of running a balanced budget.

We have grown the economy out of these problems in the past, so why do the Democrats in charge of things now feel that it is their solemn duty to destroy any potential for economic growth.  Why are they claiming that the Republicans, who by the way control no part of anything, and haven’t for years, are sabotaging the economy.  Why does anyone able to form a thought fall for this.  Boeing, a major U.S. corporation tried their level best to employ thousands in South Carolina, which would have led to a multiplier effect that would have been a tremendous boon to the Democrats politically in the 2012 elections.  When Barack Obama gave his speech about job creation, and turning the economy around, it could have been true.  Our old friend hyper regulation reared its ugly head and put the stopper on that.  Here’s the thing, I would rather see my friends and  neighbors working and prospering than to have President Obama preside over a terrible economy.

Yesterday, Barack Obama gave a tongue lashing to the House Leadership, which is Republican, about leading on the budget, and solving our economic woes.  Then he jetted off for another round of golf and more vacation time.  Leadership is important, but it starts with a President, and then it filters down to the legislators. So, where is Obama’s budget?  He has yet to offer one as President.  This is his third year in office, and his homework is now about 2 and 1/2 years late.  Come to think of it, for the entire time the Democrats controlled the House, they failed to prepare a single budget.  This is the ultimate in shirking responsibility.  The President’s tongue lashings have become a joke, and deservedly so.

I consider myself a conservative first, and probably identify with Republicans more than Democrats.  I know that this shocks no one, but I do have some instances of when the GOP angers me as well.  Mostly it happens when they capitulate in the ideals they promised to uphold but did not.  I sent John Boehner a few letters stating I wanted no compromising going on.  Yet, when I turn on the T.V. there is some Republican who is saying, “I think the voters sent us here to get along and to iron out our differences and to work out a compromise to move the country forward.”  What on Earth do we have to do to these dolts to let them know we sent them to Washington as a restraining order against the asinine profligate spending going on.

Here is the train wreck about to happen.  Our own ideas for our debt limit as we should have noticed by now is completely meaningless.  It is an imaginary number that when we get close to it, it just gets bigger.  The debt limit that is not meaningless is that which is imposed by our creditors.  One such creditor, PIMCO has announced, a few months back that they are indeed refusing to loan us another dime.  No, they are not our biggest creditor, but in my experience, creditors tend to have very similar outlooks.  Standard and Poors, Fitch, Moody’s, Credit Suisse, have all downgraded our bond ratings.  This means that the people who rate our ability to pay back loans is now out there telling our creditors, and their risk committees that we aren’t as capable of paying back our loans as we would like everyone to believe.  What will happen when the rest of the world refuses to loan us another dime, well my friends, we will finally get the balanced budget amendment I’ve always wanted.  The two trains on the track are our massive spending, and the massive borrowing we must do in order to keep that spending going.  These trains are too massive to stop, and so they are going to crash.  The only question now, is whether or not we wish to apply the brakes to soften the blow.

Hat tip Rodan.

Cross Posted at Musings of a Mad Conservative.

IMF warns US and Europe over deficits

by Phantom Ace ( 3 Comments › )
Filed under Economy, Europe, Special Report at June 17th, 2011 - 10:35 am

For decades, the IMF used to give economic advice to developing nations. The US and Europe were considered model nations to emulate. Well times have changed, now the IMF is warning the US and Europe to get their fiscal situation under control. If they don’t, there will be a global financial crisis.

SAO PAULO (Reuters) – The International Monetary Fund cut its forecast for U.S. economic growth on Friday and warned Washington and debt-ridden European countries that they are “playing with fire” unless they take immediate steps to reduce their budget deficits.

The IMF, in its regular assessment of global economic prospects, said that bigger threats to growth had emerged since its previous report in April, citing the euro zone debt crisis and signs of overheating in emerging market economies.

The global lender forecast that U.S. gross domestic product would grow an anemic 2.5 percent this year and 2.7 percent in 2012. In its forecast just two months ago, it had expected 2.8 percent and 2.9 percent growth, respectively.

Times have changed!