► Show Top 10 Hot Links

Posts Tagged ‘General Petraeus’

Will Petraeus be the Eisenhower of 2012?

by Mojambo ( 176 Comments › )
Filed under Politics, Republican Party at May 4th, 2010 - 1:00 pm

I do not know that much about General David Petraeus outside of the fact that he designed the brilliant surge plan in Iraq and has had a hell of a time working with the appeasement oriented Obama administration. However I think the stakes are so high in 2012 that anyone who can beat Obama deserves a serious consideration and some of the social issues do not seem nearly as important as putting an end to government deficit spending,  the socialistic take over of the economy, and a cowardly foreign policy. The down side to a Petraeus presidency could be that we would have a repeat of so many Republican administrations – trying to be “above” partisanship means that you give your opponents free reign to subvert you – see Eisenhower, George H.W. Bush, and George W. Bush.

by Philip Klein

In the early stages of implementing the surge strategy in Iraq, United States military commanders started to detect that the new plan was working, but the signs of progress were overshadowed as casualties mounted while American soldiers fought to secure the cities.

During a meeting around this time, a senior officer put his arm around Gen. David Petraeus, then leading the war effort in Iraq, and advised, “You know, you’ve got a messaging problem.”

Petraeus replied, “With all due respect, what we really have is a results problem.”

In late March of this year, Petraeus recalled the encounter at a press conference held during a trip to Manchester, New Hampshire. He punctuated the story by noting, “Occasionally, I can hear my old Dutch-American sea captain father, who would periodically remind his son, ‘It’s about results, boy.'”

At a time when the U.S. is facing multiple crises at home and abroad and Americans are increasingly disenchanted with Washington, Petraeus’s record of accomplishments — most prominently helping to turn around the Iraq war that many had written off as lost — has set him apart from other national leaders. And as the Republican Party struggles to repair the image for incompetence it gained during the Bush era, Petraeus finds himself the subject of continued speculation as to whether he may seek the presidency, no matter how many times he tries to put the issue to rest.

“I’d like to see Gen. Petraeus warm up,” Bob Dole, the former Senate Majority Leader and 1996 Republican presidential nominee, told the Politico last fall. “I don’t know anything about his politics, whether he has an interest. It’s kind of a time for another Eisenhower, in my view.”

[…]

Read the rest here: Will Petraeus be like Ike?

Petraeus: Iran aiding AL-Qaeda

by Phantom Ace ( 147 Comments › )
Filed under Al Qaeda, Iran, Terrorism at March 17th, 2010 - 11:00 am

The Ayatollah Regime in Iran is beloved by the Tranzi Progressive Movement. The International Left forced the Bush Administration to back off their plans on hitting Iran’s nuke sites. Whenever this regime has been exposed for the criminal thugs they are, Progressive apologists make excuses for them and blame America or Israel. After September 11th, when many suspected Iran had links to AL-Qaeda, the Left denied this. Their claim was that Shiite Iran would never help Sunni AL-Qaeda. Well as usual the Progressives have been caught in a lie.

Iran is assisting al Qaeda by facilitating links between senior terrorist leaders and affiliate groups, the commander of U.S. forces in the Middle East told Congress on Tuesday.

Army Gen. David H. Petraeus, commander of the U.S. Central Command, also said Iran’s nuclear program is facing problems, and as a result, Tehran is not expected to emerge with a nuclear weapon this year.

Read the rest: Tehran aiding al Qaeda links, Petraeus says

This comes as no shock to me. In Bosnia, the Iranian Revolutionary Guards fought alongside Al-Qaeda against the Serbs. Recently, Iran and Al-Qaeda plotted to kill an Israeli diplomat in Jordan. What many Americans, even some Conservatives, don’t get is that it’s Dar AL Islam (House of Islam) vs. Dar AL Haab (House of War). Islam must conquer the non Islamic lands, hence we are the war zone. Iran and AL-Qaeda working together against us is what their political ideology calls for. Even if they fight each other, they would bury their hostility and come after us.