► Show Top 10 Hot Links

Posts Tagged ‘John Podhoretz’

Barack Obama’s 9/11 envy

by Mojambo ( 158 Comments › )
Filed under Barack Obama, Progressives at June 15th, 2010 - 12:00 pm

Yes Obama compares the BP oil spill to 9/11 rather than Hurricane Katrina (obviously because Katrina got blamed on his predecessor). Bush became popular not because of 9/11 but because of his response to it (as John Podhoretz points out).  Obama gives us all the evidence we need to come to the conclusion that he is a self pitying narcissist.

by John Podhoretz

President Obama doesn’t like the fact that the Gulf oil spill reminds people of Hurricane Katrina, since the public response to that catastrophe hastened the decline of his predecessor’s standing. He’d prefer that the American people be reminded of something else — something that rallied people around their president.

And so he told Politico over the weekend that the oil spill has “echoes of 9/11.”

Americans thought differently about “our vulnerabilities” after the events of 9/11, Obama said, and the oil spill is “going to shape how we think about the environment and energy for many years to come.”

Just as in those cases, what’s most notable about 9/11 and the oil spill is how essentially different they are. One was a brilliantly conceived and diabolical act of war; the other a horrific accident that was the last thing anybody wanted to happen. One was designed to decapitate the US government and deliver a mortal blow to the world’s financial system; the other wasn’t designed at all.

One was purposeful destruction intended to harm. The other is a purposeless catastrophe that was in no way intentional at all but will do great harm. One was an attack on the United States. The other was an accident.

So what on earth could the president have been thinking?

Read the rest: Obama’s 9/11 Envy

How to run a magazine into the ground

by Mojambo ( 92 Comments › )
Filed under Media at May 9th, 2010 - 11:30 am

Newsweek was always a conventionally liberal magazine  (owned by the Establishment Liberal Washington Post). In the past few years though it has become so liberal and so slavishly devoted to Barack Obama, apologizing for the worst aggressions of the Islamic cause, and trashing capitalism (remember the  “We are all socialists now” issue cover?) that one can only find months old copies of  it in Dentists offices. The Washington Post has put it up for sale and I suspect that it will eventually fold

hat tip –Ace of Spades

by John Podhoretz

Last year, Newsweek redesigned itself with an eye toward failure. Literally. The newsmagazine was getting itself out of the newsmagazine business and pursuing a higher-end market through a combination of news analysis and opinion. The idea behind the magazine’s redesign was to hasten its contraction from a circulation over 2 million to one around 1 million, while simultaneously raising the cover price. This was not, in and of itself, a silly idea. What Newsweek and its editor, Jon Meacham, were acknowledging is that the 2 million circulation was illusory, and that the actual readership of the magazine, with people renewing their subscriptions year after year or buying it on the newsstand week after week, was half the size.

[…]

For years, Newsweek was a liberal journal of opinion masquerading as a news publication that attempted to sell itself to a mass readership with a lot of health-care, entertainment, and lifestyle fluff. As a vehicle for news analysis, it was entirely conventional; as a purveyor of sociological fluff, it was kind of fun, though often enragingly so; as a journal of opinion, it was to actual journals of opinion as tofutti is to gelato, flavorless and bland and mock. Last year, Meacham and Co. ditched much of the news analysis and sociological fluff in favor of more and more opinion.

It will not surprise you to know that much of the opinion dealt with the ways in which Barack Obama was right and noble and good and strong and tough and resourceful and a good symbol and an agent of change and so is his wife, by the way — and when it was not about that, it was primarily about how the right is at war with itself and torn and in conflict and dominated by anger and full of rage and presumptively racist and anti-gay and anti-women and anti-media. That was to be expected. But there was really almost nothing else in there, and what was there as a matter of ideological coloration wasn’t especially tough or good or interesting or novel.

[…]

And the public beheld it, and like the child in the classic New Yorker cartoon, the public said, “I say it’s spinach, and I say the hell with it.”

Read the rest here: Newsweek Squeak