► Show Top 10 Hot Links

Posts Tagged ‘Michael Barone’

Obama Boom: It’s always unexpected

by Phantom Ace ( 1 Comment › )
Filed under Barack Obama, Democratic Party, Economy, Headlines, Media, Misery Index, Progressives, unemployment at May 29th, 2011 - 8:07 pm

When there’s bad economic news, the media claims it’s unexpected. They are always claiming good times are just 6 months away. For the last 3 years, it hasn’t materialize. Why does the media keep doing this? Well the answer simple, Barack Hussein Obama is our President!

Unexpectedly!

As megablogger Glenn Reynolds, aka Instapundit, has noted with amusement, the word “unexpectedly” or variants thereon keep cropping up in mainstream media stories about the economy.

[….]

Which raises some questions. As Instapundit reader Gordon Stewart, quoted by Reynolds on May 17, put it, “How many times in a row can something happen unexpectedly before the experts start to, you know, expect it? At some point, shouldn’t they be required to state the foundation for their expectations?”

One answer is that many in the mainstream media have been cheerleading for Barack Obama. They and he both naturally hope for a strong economic recovery. After all, Obama can’t keep blaming the economic doldrums on George W. Bush forever.

The media is nothing more than a propaganda arm of the Obama regime. They love this man and will to cover for him.

A terrible mistake – the partition of India and the creation of Pakistan

by Mojambo ( 61 Comments › )
Filed under Afghanistan, India, Islamic Terrorism, Israel, Nuclear Weapons, Pakistan, Palestinians, Syria, Taliban, Terrorism, UK at May 13th, 2011 - 8:30 am

I agree, India should be a natural ally of the United States of America. Sadly the early decades of Indian independence under the Nehru/Gandhi family rule saw India as an unofficial ally of the U.S.S.R. Unfortunately President Obama has a soft spot in his heart for Pock-ee-stahn. Pakistan is example number 1 of a failed nation, a nation ruled by military men and possessed of a violent citizenry who seem to want nothing better to do with their miserable lives then wage jihad. Funny how the same folks who believe in a bi-national state of Israel/Palestine (which would become an Arab state quickly) do not seem to want Pakistan and India to be merged into a single nation.

by Michael Barone

When you get into discussions about the Middle East with certain people, you start hearing that the great mistake was the partition of Palestine and the creation of the state of Israel in 1948. If that had somehow just not happened, you hear, everything would be all right.

That’s not my view. I think the big mistake made in a British possession around that time was the partition of the Indian subcontinent into India and Pakistan in 1947.

The British thought that Pakistan under the leadership of the secular lawyer Muhammad Ali Jinnah would turn out to be an acceptable counterbalance to an India led by Jawaharlal Nehru’s Congress party.

But Jinnah was suffering from cancer at the time and died in September 1948, 13 months after partition. And Pakistan ever since has been — well, let’s say it has been a problem.

While India has had only one brief suspension of its democratic constitution since independence, Pakistan has been ruled by generals most of the time since 1948. Pakistan was an American ally during the Cold War and helped expel the Soviets from Afghanistan.

But in the years since the collapse of the Soviet Union, elements in Pakistan’s military and its intelligence service, the ISI, backed the Taliban in Afghanistan and supported terrorist attacks on India. They have sheltered A.Q. Khan, the nuclear scientist who developed Pakistan’s nuclear bomb and conducted, as analyst Walter Russell Mead writes, “the nuclear proliferation circus that helped countries like North Korea, Libya, Syria and Iran advance their nuclear ambitions.”

[…]

And the fact that American forces found and killed Osama bin Laden in a $1 million house less than a mile from Pakistan’s military academy in Abbottabad makes it plain that some if not all Pakistani leaders were harboring America’s No. 1 enemy.

Pakistan’s current president, Asif Ali Zardari, took to the pages of the Washington Post to deny that Pakistan knew anything about bin Laden’s hideout. And National Security Adviser Tom Donilon told Sunday talk show viewers that he has “not seen any evidence at least to date that the political, military or intelligence leadership of Pakistan knew” about it.

[…]

But we shouldn’t kid ourselves. Since bin Laden’s death, Pakistani media have, for the second time in six months, divulged the identity of the CIA station chief in the country. People in the Pakistani military and/or the ISI are giving the United States a big middle finger.

How should we respond? We could list Pakistan as a state sponsor of terrorism, we could cut off the billions in aid we send to the Pakistan government, and we could conduct additional operations like the Abbottabad raid. But those moves would risk an open rupture that would imperil our efforts in Afghanistan.

One card we could play would be to strengthen relations with India. In the Cold War we backed Pakistan against India, but after 1991 we moved closer to India, first under Bill Clinton and more so under George W. Bush with the U.S.-India nuclear cooperation treaty. I’ve long felt that the India card was one reason Musharraf agreed to cooperate after Sept. 11.

[…]

In retrospect the partition of India and the creation of Pakistan in 1947 was a terrific mistake. Unfortunately, we can’t rewind history.

Read the rest: History weeps at the partition of India and Pakistan

Changing Demographics will not doom the GOP

by Phantom Ace ( 91 Comments › )
Filed under Democratic Party, Elections, immigration, Multiculturalism, Politics, Progressives, Republican Party at April 4th, 2011 - 3:00 pm

The progressives are hyping the decline of the “White” population. They are claiming this will doom the Republican Party and that the 2010 elections were a fluke and last stand by “White” America. To begin with let me debunk a few myths. the majority of Hispanics in the US consider themselves White. for some strange reason, Progressives and some Conservatives don’t accept them as White. In fact, there has been a campaign in America to de-Europeanize Hispanics and make them some non European group. In places like California and New York, this campaign has worked. In places like Florida, New Mexico and Texas, it’s gone nowhere. Hispanics even those who are not White belong to the same Mediterranean culture as Italians and Greeks. Many Hispanics have also intermarried with the White American population (Mostly with Italians and Irish), hence their kids are thoroughly Americanize.

Asian Americans have integrated successfully into mainstream American society. Many have intermarried with White Americans and are indistinguishable from any other American. They tend to be very successful professional and business owners. Asians have been here form more than 150 and are a solid part of the American mosaic. The Progressives have created a false image of Hispanics and Asians as Non American or victims. Thus they are hoping that this image will cause resentment and thus hope it leads to these2 groups to feel isolated and turning to the Democrats as their only allies. WHat the Left doesn’t copunton is that attitudes change and teh fact that many Hispanic and Asians are Conservative, thus open to the GOP’s message.

Are whites on the verge of becoming a minority of the American population? That’s what some analysts of the 2010 Census results claim. Many go on, sometimes with relish, to say that this spells electoral doom for the Republican Party.

I think the picture is more complicated than that. And that the demise of the Republican Party is no more foreordained than it was a century ago when Italian, Jewish and Polish immigrants were pouring into the United States in proportions much greater than the Hispanic and Asian immigration of the past two decades.

The numbers do appear stark. The Census tells us that 16 percent of U.S. residents are Hispanic, up from 13 percent in 2000 and 9 percent in 1990, and that 5 percent are Asian, up from 4 percent in 2000. The percentage of blacks held steady at 13. Among children, the voters of tomorrow, those percentages are higher.

But it’s a mistake to see blacks, Hispanics and Asians as a single “people of color” voting bloc. The 2010 exit poll shows that the Republican percentages in the vote for the U.S. House were 60 percent among whites, 9 percent among blacks, 38 percent among Hispanics and 40 percent among Asians.

Simple arithmetic tells you that Hispanics and Asians vote more like whites than like blacks. The picture is similar in the 2008 exit poll.

Read the rest: GOP Shouldn’t Panic If Whites Become a Minority

SO let’s take the Progressives and their argument at face value. Demographics are changing, so what! Culture defines a people and not some one’s biological make up. The Left is obsessed with race, hence they have created 2 fictitious new races, Asians and Hispanics. This is quit laughable considering as I have stated earlier, Most Hispanics are Whiteand even if you include those that aren’t, the culture is a branch of the Southern European-Latin culture which Italians and Greeks also belong to. Asians are so diverse that to put Japanese and Chinese in thesame category. If naything, this shows the racist nature of Progressives.

Conservatives need to get their message out to these 2 growing blocks. One aspect is to view Hispanics and Asians not as big monolithic groups, but as individuals. Use Asian and Hispanic Conservatives as outreach to these communities, go before Spanish language media and make the Conservative case. Keep in mind that until Ronald Reagan, White Catholics were solidly Democrats, now they are mostly Republican or swing votes. To cripple the Democrats, Republicans just need to win 40-45% of the Hispanic vote. One Way to this is to concentrate efforts on Hispanics who are Middle Class, Professionals, Devout Catholics and business owners. If The GOp can lock up these groups of Hispanic voters, then they will do well.

The GOP needs to clarify their stance on illegal immigration. They need to emphasize, that illegals are the issue and not legal immigrants. To many Republicans fall into this culture war with Hispanics as some threat to America. What these fools don’t realize is that over 400 years, the ancestors of Hispanics along with their Italian cousins saved the West from Islam. So it’s much fear mongering over nothing. Asians are no threat and one just has to look at Hawaii as an example. It’s mostly Asian and Polynesian, yet it’s American as apple pie.

If the GOP plays it’s cards right, they will benefit from the growing Hispanic and Asian population in America. But we are talking about a Party that is cooperating with Obama’s illegal Libyan war, appeases Islam and lies to current constituents about their agenda. Before they outreach to other groups, the GOP needs to get its House in order. If the Republicans aren’t serving their current voters, how ill they appeal to new ones? That is another thread.

Has the tea party lost its momentum?

by Mojambo ( 188 Comments › )
Filed under Economy, Tea Parties at April 1st, 2011 - 8:30 am

I don’t think so, however we need to get beyond the term “tea party” which has become a term that has become marginalized and go back to traditional Reaganomics. We also need to support more electable candidates.  Sadly, we have let the opposition to define us and we need to stay away from controversial “red meat’ issues .

by Michael Barone

Has the wind gone out of the sails of the small-government movement? Is the Tea Party going through a hangover?

You can find some evidence for these propositions. In Washington, Democrats such as former party chairman Howard Dean gleefully anticipate a government shutdown, and Sen. Charles Schumer thinks he can drive a wedge between Speaker John Boehner and “extremist” tea partiers.

In state capitals, some new Republican governors are getting hostile receptions to their plans for cutting spending and curtailing the power of public-employee unions.

In Ohio, Gov. John Kasich has only 30 percent approval, according to a Quinnipiac poll. Pennsylvania’s Tom Corbett, easily elected last November, has negative ratings as well.

And in the state that has made more headlines than any other this year, Wisconsin, Gov. Scott Walker is facing some headwinds. He did get the Republican legislature to pass limits on the bargaining powers of state-employee unions. And union dues aren’t going to be deducted from public employees’ next paychecks.

But the Democratic state senators’ tactic of leaving the state and the often violent protests at the state capitol have mobilized public-employee unions and their supporters.

A Polling Company poll conducted for Independent Women’s Voice showed 53 percent of voters with unfavorable feelings toward Walker and only 46 percent favorable. By a similar margin, voters sided with the public-employee unions over the governor in the recent controversy.

It should be noted that this poll has a small sample and a larger share of voters in union households (38 percent) than in the 2008 and 2010 Wisconsin exit polls (26 percent). And on issues of this kind, question wording can make a big difference in responses.

[…..]

Christie and Virginia governor Bob McDonnell, both elected in 2009, have won public acceptance of major spending cuts by making the alternatives and the facts clear.

Republicans in Wisconsin and other states, and Republican leaders in Washington, need to do the same. Given their druthers, voters oppose tax increases and spending cuts. But they’re responsive to the message that in these hard economic times, it’s not possible to have all good things.

They have seen that vast spending increases haven’t generated jobs, and they understand that tax increases can choke a sputtering economic recovery. Given the facts, they understand that public-employee unions inflate spending, reduce accountability, and operate as a mechanism for the involuntary transfer of taxpayer money to one political party.

The press won’t make that case. Republicans and tea partiers need to do it themselves

Read the rest: No more tea?