► Show Top 10 Hot Links

Posts Tagged ‘Michael Goodwin’

Quotations of Chairman Maobama

by Mojambo ( 105 Comments › )
Filed under Afghanistan, Barack Obama, China, Communism, Iran, Libya, Progressives at March 13th, 2011 - 5:30 pm

Gee Mr. Goodwin it is not like people did not warn you what American and the world would be like if we voted in an untested, ideological, inexperienced, neophyte to the most important position in the world. Obama, a man of the radical left (wearing a neat suit and a pasted on smile) and the corrupt Chicago machine,  is what you get when you give a mediocre, unqualified professor real power.  It amazes me that intelligent people such as Michael Goodwin and Daniel Hannan either voted for him or supported him (Hannan is British) and are now expressing buyers remorse, I guess all those warnings that the Edsel was a lemon would not have stuck with you either. We need a good candidate in 2012.

by Michael Goodwin

First I did a double take. He said what? I read it again and the shock waves followed.

A beleaguered President Obama has told aides it would be so much easier to be the president of China, The New York Times reports.

There are two ways to read the remark, which is attributed to anonymous aides. One is that Obama resents the burden of global leadership that comes with the American presidency. The other is that he longs for an authoritarian system, where he need tolerate no dissent.

Under either or both interpretations, his confession carries a dose of self-pity that means Obama has hit a wall.

He is in over his head, and he knows it.

Even before the horror in Japan, the president faced a litany of nightmares. From Libya to Iran to Afghanistan to gas prices, unemployment and rising debt, Obama is surrounded by serious trouble.

His responses range from halfhearted to wrongheaded. Nothing is working. Unhappy voters already repudiated his first two years and might fire him when they get the chance. It is a moment that brings home the truth of the sign on Harry Truman’s desk: “The buck stops here.”

Yet my suspicion is that it’s not the problems per se that have Obama envying a lower rung on the global ladder. It’s that he regards them as endless distractions that keep getting in the way of his transformative agenda.

[…]

He wants America to be less exceptional and more like every other nation. He’s uncomfortable with our status as the No. 1 superpower, as he made clear with his apology tours and by submitting to the lowest common denominator in the United Nations.

He talks about wanting Moammar Khadafy to go but takes no action to make it happen and even signed on to an arms embargo that the State Department says bars our supplying the rebels.

As The Wall Street Journal wrote, the rising slaughter reveals “what the world without US leadership looks like.”

Meanwhile, he punts on the budget mess, as if details are beneath him. On soaring gas prices, the purpose of his dreary Friday press conference, his policy seems to be peevishness that he must be bothered.

As shocking as the China lament is, it’s not surprising. The desire to sidestep messy reality is the thread that runs through his presidency, starting with the campaign.

[…]

Read the rest: Sayings of Chariman Maobama

Progressives in denial

by Phantom Ace ( 204 Comments › )
Filed under Barack Obama, Democratic Party, Elections 2010, Elections 2012, Liberal Fascism, Politics, Progressives, Socialism, Tranzis at November 21st, 2010 - 6:00 pm

The Progressive movement is acting as if November 2nd elections didn’t occur. They are pushing to pass Leftist policies like the Dream Act and DADT, that were rejected by the voters.  John Podesta head of the Fascistic Center for American Progress is calling for to bypass Congress and govern by executive order, the Constitution be damned!The Democrats in congress re-elected Tranzi Totalitarian radical Nancy Pelosi to lead them in the minority status. Harry Reid feel empowered after defeating the pathetic and his hand picked opponent Sharon Angle, who will soon be some Casino greater in Vegas. The Left claims they lost the election because they didn’t get their message out, a total lie since they control the media. Their latest spin if that the message of the election was they want the voters to work together. This is hogwash and it shows the state of denial the Progressives are in about the public and the rejection of their radical agenda.

Pick your favorite: “Those who ignore history are doomed to repeat it.” Or, “Insanity is doing the same thing over and over and expecting a different result.”

Either way, the wisdom is wasted on President Obama and congressional Democrats. They learned nothing from the historic shellacking voters gave them.

[….]

Ridiculed for first claiming they lost because of a failure to communicate, Dems have a new talking point. Call it the failure equivalence theory.

Voters don’t “have a lot of faith in the Republican Party and they don’t have a lot of faith in the Democratic Party,” Vice President Joe Biden now says. “And so they’re saying, ‘OK, we want you guys to work together.’ “

Read the rest: Dems run a’Ground’

This shows the Neo-Feudal attitude of the Progressive movement. They feel that because they went to elite Ivy League schools and that they were born with silver spoons in their mouth, that it’s the right to rule. Leftists feel they have a right to reorder society and treat the American public as pawns for their wacky social experiments. Even after being rejected by the public, they continue with their elitist agenda. Clearly Progressives are not grounded in reality and this makes them dangerous and why they must be defeated.

A turn to the right and other political musings

by Mojambo ( 151 Comments › )
Filed under Barack Obama, Democratic Party, Economy, Elections 2010, Republican Party at September 19th, 2010 - 6:00 pm


Don’t miss the Sunday NFL thread below



I am cautiously confident about the House but pessimistic about the Senate. However winning even one branch of congress will be a big step to halting Obamaism.  I agree with Goodwin “just because the Democrats deserve to lose does  not mean that  Republicans  deserve to win”. We need strong, winnable candidates out there, not someone like Carl Paladino. By the way “gridlock” is fine if it means slowing down a runaway liberal agenda. Obama would have been better off doing nothing then what he did with the stimulus and Healthcare and his arrogance in the way he treated opponents and foreign allies will surely come back at him in November.

by Michael Goodwin

At the 2008 Democratic convention, Massachusetts Gov. Deval Patrick issued a warning to his surging party. “Democrats don’t deserve to win just because Re publicans deserve to lose,” he said.

It was my favorite line of the campaign, and we now know it was prophetic. Dems clearly didn’t deserve to win all the power in Washington, as they prove almost every day.

Their failure to govern in a responsible and responsive way is wrecking the nation’s finances and costing them the trust of Americans. They have sparked fear and loathing toward government institutions unprecedented in modern times.

So the temptation arises, as we get ready to go to the polls again, to issue the same challenge to the GOP. Just because Democrats deserve to lose, do Republicans deserve to win?

Yes, yes, a thousand times yes. By default, but not just default.

The 2010 midterms are not the flip side of 2008. This is an emergency election, as vital as any in memory.

Forget what the parties deserve. The nation deserves a major change in the balance of power.

President Obama, Nancy Pelosi and Harry Reid have presided over an outrageous plundering of national wealth and power.

[…]

In fairness, they inherited a bad situation. In truth, they made it worse in nearly every major respect.

The country is broke and divided, with the exposed fault lines multiplying. The president who pledged to heal the nation instead brought a gas can to the fire.

He has exacerbated an us-against-them culture, routinely demonizing any who stand in his way. His use of personal invectives diminishes the Oval Office.

He is a bully at home, but weak and uncertain abroad. Iran is two years closer to a nuclear weapon, yet America’s resolve is in doubt.

Our troops fighting and dying in Afghanistan are being undermined, our Marine commandant says, by the president’s public determination to begin exiting next year. And still the president persists in his timetable.

Republicans began his term defeated and demoralized. Only because Democrats overreached so egregiously did they find common purpose with legions of independent voters.

For their trouble, they are derided as obstructionists and the party of no. But no, as it turns out, is the absolute right answer. No more Obamaism is the best medicine.

[…]

Carl the Snarl needs to nix the nastiness

Unless the GOP nominee for governor, Carl Paladino, finds a gear other than nasty, his Tea Party roots could become tea for one.

His and his team’s habit of name- calling — George Pataki is a “degenerate idiot,” and Gov. Paterson is a “whoremonger”– is cheap theater. He wants to put welfare families in former prisons to teach them “hygiene” and sends campaign literature that smells like garbage.

It’s all a head turner, and a turn-off.

Read the rest here: A welcome right turn



Don’t miss the Sunday NFL thread below



Stating the obvious – he’s just not that up to the job

by Mojambo ( 66 Comments › )
Filed under Barack Obama, Tranzis at June 6th, 2010 - 9:16 am

Golly gee whiz who would’ve thought that a young man with a paper thin resume, virtually no experience in the private sector, no legislative accomplishments, protected and propped up by a sycophantic  media, a huge sense of entitlement combined with a messianic complex, a man who has a very poor image of America’s history and the role it has played on the world stage, does not believe in American exceptionalism, and who surrounded himself all his life with Marxists and neo-Socialists, an overbearing  sanctimonious sense that only his “way” is the right way  – would make a piss-poor president. No I could not see that coming.

by Michael Goodwin

His message is wrong. He’s not showing enough anger. He’s lost control of the narrative. He’s a victim of bad luck and big oil.

It’s excuse time in the fudge factory. President Obama is getting lots of cover and advice from his left-leaning media friends. Their ideas run the gamut from public relations to, well, public relations.

Beyond the irony of journalists urging more spin from a politician, the really remarkable fact is that none dare consider the possibility that Obama is simply not up to the job. It is a scary thought, but evidence of consistent failure is overwhelming.

The high point of his presidency came the day he took office. Since then, a majority of Americans has opposed virtually all his major policies and he has prevailed on several only because of large Democratic congressional advantages.

The problems are growing, but he’s not. If he were, we’d see green shoots of improvement.

Instead, the White House is going backwards at home and abroad and shows no ability to adjust. Like a cult, it interprets every reversal as proof of its righteousness and of others’ malignancy.

What started out as a whiff of rookie incompetence has become a suffocating odor. It’s hard to find a single area where Obama’s policies are a convincing success.

Read the rest: Slick talk aside, O’s just not up to the job