► Show Top 10 Hot Links

Posts Tagged ‘Nuclear Weapons’

Hugo Chavez’s Venezuela To Go Nuclear

by WrathofG-d ( 186 Comments › )
Filed under Barack Obama, Democratic Party, Iran, Leftist-Islamic Alliance, Nuclear Weapons, Russia, United Nations, Venezuela, World at September 16th, 2009 - 10:07 am

Undoubtedly a result of the fecklessness of the Obama Administration, and the UN in response to Iran’s moving forward toward nuclear weapons, Hugo Chavez has decided to begin working on becoming a nuclear power himself.

The connections between Venezuela and Iran are well documented, and it seems that we are now finally seeing the fruits of our ignoring them.

It is all being underwritten by Russia (of course).

http://mypetjawa.mu.nu/archives/chavez_ahmadinejad_iran_hug.jpg http://static.indianexpress.com/m-images/2009-04-18/M_Id_72338_obama_chavez_meet.jpg















CARACAS, Venezuela —  Hugo Chavez wants to join the nuclear energy club and is looking to Russia for help in getting started.

The Venezuelan leader is already dismissing critics’ concerns over his nuclear ambitions, offering assurances his aims are peaceful and that Venezuela will simply be following in the footsteps of other South American nations using nuclear energy.

Yet his project remains in its planning stages and still faces a host of practical hurdles, likely requiring billions of dollars, as well as technology and expertise that Venezuela lacks.

Russia has offered to help bridge that gap, and Chavez has announced that the two countries have created an atomic energy commission.

“I say it before the world: Venezuela is going to start the process of developing nuclear energy, but we’re not going to make an atomic bomb, so don’t be bothering us afterward … (with) something like what they have against Iran,” Chavez said Sunday.

The socialist president is closely allied with Iran and defends its nuclear program while the U.S. and other countries accuse Tehran of having a secret nuclear weapons program.

Does this “we are doing it just for peaceful purposes” sound familiar?

Oh, don’t worry; the Obama Administration responded:

U.S. State Department spokesman Ian Kelly on Monday expressed misgivings about Venezuela’s nuclear ambitions. Responding to a reporter’s question about whether the United States would be worried about nuclear transfers between Iran and Venezuela, Kelly said: “The short answer is, to that, yes, we do have concerns.”

Kelly noted that Venezuela is a signatory of the Nuclear Nonproliferation Treaty, which would restrict any nuclear program to nonmilitary purposes.

{The Article}

Al Qaeda: We Would Use Pakistani Nuclear Weapons

by WrathofG-d ( 24 Comments › )
Filed under Al Qaeda, Democratic Party, George W. Bush, Islamic Terrorism, Islamists, Jihad, Nuclear Weapons, Pakistan, Politics, Religion, Terrorism, World at June 22nd, 2009 - 10:57 am

Despite the Western Leftists insuring the World that Islam means peace, Terrorism doesn’t exist, and they only hate us because of George W. Bush…Al Qaeda hasn’t quite gotten the message.

________________________________

(Reuters) – If it were in a position to do so, Al Qaeda would use Pakistan’s nuclear weapons in its fight against the United States, a top leader of the group said in remarks aired Sunday.

Pakistan has been battling al Qaeda’s Taliban allies in the Swat Valley since April after their thrust into a district 100 km (60 miles) northwest of the capital raised fears the nuclear-armed country could slowly slip into militant hands.

“God willing, the nuclear weapons will not fall into the hands of the Americans and the mujahideen would take them and use them against the Americans,” Mustafa Abu al-Yazid, the leader of al Qaeda’s in Afghanistan, said in an interview with Al Jazeera television.

Abu al-Yazid was responding to a question about U.S. safeguards to seize control over Pakistan’s nuclear weapons in case Islamist fighters came close to doing so.

“We expect that the Pakistani army would be defeated (in Swat) … and that would be its end everywhere, God willing.”

Asked about the group’s plans, the Egyptian militant leader said: “The strategy of the (al Qaeda) organization in the coming period is the same as in the previous period: to hit the head of the snake, the head of tyranny — the United States.

“That can be achieved through continued work on the open fronts and also by opening new fronts in a manner that achieves the interests of Islam and Muslims and by increasing military operations that drain the enemy financially.”

The militant leader suggested that naming a new leader for the group’s unit in the Arabian Peninsula, Abu Basir al-Wahayshi, could revive its campaign in Saudi Arabia, the world’s top oil exporter.

Our goals have been the Americans … and the oil targets which they are stealing to gain power to strike the mujahideen and Muslims.”

“There was a setback in work there for reasons that there is no room to state now, but as of late, efforts have been united and there is unity around a single leader.”

Abu al-Yazid, also known as Abu Saeed al-Masri, said al Qaeda will continue “with large scale operations against the enemy” — by which he meant the United States.

“We have demanded and we demand that all branches of al Qaeda carry out such operations,” he said, referring to attacks against U.S.-led forces in Iraq and Afghanistan.

The militant leader said al Qaeda would be willing to accept a truce of about 10 years’ duration (ed- ie: hudna) with the United States if Washington agreed to withdraw its troops from Muslim countries and stopped backing Israel and the pro-Western governments of Muslim nations.

Asked about the whereabouts of al Qaeda’s top leaders, he said: “Praise God, sheikh Osama (bin Laden) and sheikh Ayman al-Zawahri are safe from the reach of the enemies, but we would not say where they are; moreover, we do not know where they are, but we’re in continuous contact with them.”

________________________________

But really, don’t worry.  Our deal leader is on top of all these Bush era overseas contingency operations (aka: man made disasters).  Nothing that a good conversation couldn’t fix.


What?  Me worry!?

Iran’s Idea Of Diplomacy With The U.S.

by WrathofG-d ( 29 Comments › )
Filed under Ahmadinejad, Barack Obama, India, Iran, Israel, Nuclear Weapons, UK, United Nations, World at May 4th, 2009 - 12:01 pm

President Barack ChamberlainPresident Obama has made a huge deal about how eager he is to extend his hand in peace to those who were traditionally considered the enemies of the United States.  It seems to be his belief that but for the strength, and aggressiveness of the United States, countries such as Iran, Syria, North Korea, and Saudi Arabia would be America loving democracies.  Although the Obama Administration has famously stated that they are expecting Iran to unclench their fist, it seem that instead Iran would rather punch the U.S. in the face.

____________________________________

Iran’s Strategy In Upcoming Nuke Talks With U.S.:  Come Out Swinging

Iran intends to “come out punching” at an upcoming conference regarding nuclear armaments, and will attack the U.S. for cooperating with Israel and India on nuclear programs, according to the Reuters news agency.

The news service reported Sunday that it has obtained four Iranian working papers prepared for the meeting of the signatories of the 1970 Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT), which is aimed at halting the spread of nuclear arms. The working papers show Tehran is “redoubling its efforts to draw attention away from its own nuclear program by turning the spotlight on Washington for what it says are clear breaches of the 1970 Non-Proliferation Treaty,” Western diplomats told Reuters.

Iran will claim that the U.S. itself has violated the treaty by developing new nuclear weapons and providing nuclear aid to Israel and India, neither of which has signed the NPT.

Tehran will also slam what it calls the “nuclear-related cooperation of the United States with the Zionist regime” and say the U.S.-India nuclear deal has “severely damaged” the NPT by showing that non-signatories can receive special treatment.

In addition, Iran will blame the U.S., Britain and France “for working to prevent [Iran] and other developing countries from having complete nuclear energy programs.”

Meeting begins Monday


The signatories of the NPT gather on Monday to prepare for a major conference in 2010.

Some countries want the nuclear powers to carry out past pledges to disarm and to agree on a plan to seal loopholes that have enabled states like North Korea, which withdrew from the pact, to develop nuclear weapons.

U.N. diplomats involved in the conference told the news agency that Iran has “gone on the offensive ahead of the meeting” in order to “keep the focus away from its nuclear program.”

Tehran has refused to halt its uranium enrichment program despite three rounds of U.N. sanctions.

Iran’s NPT papers do not mention the fact that President Barack Obama has offered to conduct direct talks with Iran nearly 30 years after Washington severed ties with Tehran. “Iran is very worried that Obama’s commitment to disarmament … will make it harder to portray the Americans as the enemy,” a Western diplomat said.  “The same goes for Obama’s engagement policy. So they (Iran) want to come out punching.”

{The Article}

_________________________________

The enemies of the United States smell blood in the water, and we are all going to pay for it.   I’m afriad that someone who made his bones selling hope to hippies doesn’t realize that it is a bit different than selling peace to predators.  Hope is not a national security policy!

Why isn’t Charles calling to Bomb Iran Now?

by avideditor ( 3 Comments › )
Filed under Barack Obama, LGF at November 11th, 2008 - 9:47 am

Iran just test fired a new missile. I just wrote this at my personal blog http://avideditor.wordpress.com/2008/11/11/bomb-iran-now-iran-test-fires-new-missile-and-the-iaea-says-they-will-have-a-nuke-soon/ 

Does charles want us all to die at the hands of a Nuclear Iran? Does he side with Obama on this?