► Show Top 10 Hot Links

Posts Tagged ‘President Obama’

Palin: If Tea Partiers Were Terrorists, Obama Would Pal Around With Us

by coldwarrior ( 1 Comment › )
Filed under Headlines, Politics at August 3rd, 2011 - 1:11 pm

Sarah gets a gigantic “Well Said!” from the BGGCC Awards Committee for this:

Click here for the video and more:

Fmr. Gov. Sarah Palin responds to a report that Vice President Joe Biden said Republicans were “terrorists” during a closed-door meeting with Congressional Democrats about the debt compromise.

Palin says “enough is enough” and she’s “not going to sit here and take it anymore” when it comes to the left accusing the Tea Party of racism.

“It’s all talk and no real action. Otherwise he’d be on Biden and tell Biden to tone it down a little bit. Yeah, right, independent patriotic Americans who desire fiscal sanity in our beloved nation being called terrorists. Heck, Sean, if we were real domestic terrorists, shoot, President Obama would be wanting to pal around with us, wouldn’t he? I mean he didn’t have a problem paling around with Bill Ayers back in the day when he kicked off his political career in Bill Ayers’ apartment,” Palin said on FOX News’ “Hannity.”

Moody’s Takes Sides…Shills for Obama

by coldwarrior ( 49 Comments › )
Filed under Barack Obama, Economy, government, Politics, Special Report at July 14th, 2011 - 1:21 pm

Moody’s Investors Service put the U.S. under review for a credit rating downgrade as talks to raise the government’s $14.3 trillion debt limit stall, adding to concern that political gridlock will lead to a default.

 

The Republicans had better not fall for this threat. Moody’s, and the rest of the Wall Streeters are Obama’s biggest supporters. Hence, they dont want their gravy train to end.

 

Well, go ahead, Moody’s downgrade the US debt. I dare you. This means that your boy the man-child Obama will be the ONLY US President to have managed to gum up the works so badly that bonds getr downgraded. DO IT MOODY’S. PLEASE!!! The fallout from a downgrade would be an epic and indelible reminder of the failure that is Barak Hussein Obama.

 

It will make a lovely campaign commercial. 66% of the American public want no more debt ceiling raises. Time to pay the piper.

 

And for once, Boehner ‘gets it’

 

“As Speaker Boehner has warned for months, if the White House does not take action soon to address our nation’s debt crisis by reining in spending, the markets may do it for us,” said Michael Steel, spokesman for House Speaker John Boehner, Republican of Ohio. “This action by Moody’s today reinforces the Speaker’s warning.”

Standard & Poor’s put the U.S. government on notice on April 18 that it risks losing its AAA credit rating unless policy makers agree on a plan by 2013 to reduce budget deficits and the national debt. The firm said at the time that there’s a one-in-three chance that the rating might be cut within two years and that its “baseline assumption” is that Congress and the Obama administration will come to terms on a plan to reduce record deficits.

S&P would lower its sovereign top-level AAA ranking to D, the last rung on its scale if the U.S. can’t pay its payments because of a failure to raise the debt ceiling, John Chambers, chairman of the company’s sovereign rating committee, said June 30. Moody’s said it would probably assign a position in the Aa range, or within three steps of its highest level.

 

COLDWARRIOR UPDATE:

 

OBAMA: THIS WILL BRING DOWN MY PRESIDENCY

 

and

US Will Keep Paying Bondholders After Aug. 2: Bernanke

Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke on Wednesday said the United States would keep paying interest on government debt if Congress failed to reach a deal to lift the debt ceiling by Aug. 2.

US Federal Reserve Board Chairman Ben S. Bernanke
AP

The central banker’s comments offered the first public indication of how the Obama administration would prioritize its financial obligations after Aug. 2, when the U.S. Treasury says the government would run out of money to pay all its bills.

“The assumption is that as long as possible, the Treasury would want to try to make payments on the principal and interest to the government debt, because failure to do that would certainly throw the financial system into enormous disarray and have major impacts on the global economy,” Bernanke said.

Tax-Spend-Regulate

by coldwarrior ( 72 Comments › )
Filed under Economy, government, Politics, Regulation at July 12th, 2011 - 11:30 am

Tax-Spend-Regulate…those seem to be the modern functions of government.

 

Right now the GOP leadership and the president are in negotiations over two of the three heads of this evil hydra-headed government monster (funny. i accidentally typed mobster; hmmmm….maybe mobster is a better analogy)

 

Regardless of mobster or monster, the cost to the economy is exactly the same, regulations ARE taxation when we get down to the bottom line. If fedgov says you have to do X, then you have to pay to do X. For Example, that environmental remediation company has to come in and make your factory compliant to regulations.  In effect, the fedgov just took money out of your pocket and gave it to another company…a tax, no matter how you slice it.

 

All of those regulations force many companies to hire lawyers just to prevent the company from accidentally running afoul of one of the ten thousand plus regulations int the Federal Register. Hiring all of these lawyers is also a tax. It takes money from companies and subsidizes the legal industry. (I am not beating on lawyers here, just an example).

 

Right now. In DC, the powers that be are deciding the tax and spend part of the above equation. Why not bring regulations into the negotiation mix as well, Speaker Boehner. After all, regulations cost money  out here in job creation land. Why not cut taxes, spending, and regulating?

 

(Ironically, i thought of this topic last night and started writing it this morning, then I read this: http://www.nationalreview.com/articles/271503/put-ceiling-overregulation-john-berlau?page=2

Looks like they beat me to the presses!) so, at that point i quit writing and decided to work on the Honey-Do list.

 

Do check out the above article at NRO.

 

Check this link!  Great idea!

 

 

 

 

0Bama Hits A New Polling Low

by coldwarrior ( 18 Comments › )
Filed under Headlines at March 30th, 2011 - 11:14 am

from Quinnipiac:

 

American voters disapprove 48 – 42 percent of the job President Barack Obama is doing and say 50 – 41 percent he does not deserve to be re-elected in 2012, both all-time lows, according to a Quinnipiac University poll released today.
This compares to a 46 – 46 percent job approval rating and a 45 – 47 percent split on the President’s re-election in a March 3 survey by the independent Quinnipiac (KWIN-uh-pe-ack) University. In a hypothetical 2012 matchup, President Obama gets 36 percent of the vote to 37 percent for an unnamed Republican challenger.
Democrats approve 80 – 13 percent of the job Obama is doing, but disapproval is 81 – 9 percent among Republicans and 50 – 39 percent among independent voters. Men disapprove 52 – 41 percent while women split 44 – 44 percent.
Voters oppose 47 – 41 percent America’s involvement in Libya. In the survey concluded Monday evening as President Obama was addressing the nation about Libya, voters say 58 – 29 percent that he has not clearly stated U.S. goals for Libya.
American voters give conflicting signals about U.S. involvement in Libya:
  • They approve 53 – 35 percent of using cruise missiles to destroy Libya’s air defense;
  • They say 48 – 41 percent the U.S. should not use military force to remove Moammar Gadhafi from power;
  • They say 65 – 27 percent the U.S. should use military force to protect civilians from Gadhafi.
“President Barack Obama’s approval numbers are at their lowest level ever, slightly below where they were for most of 2010 before he got a bump up in surveys after the November election and into the early part of this year,” said Peter A. Brown, assistant director of the Quinnipiac University Polling Institute.
“Some reasons for his overall numbers might be that Obama receives negative ratings on his handling of the budget deficit, the economy, foreign policy, health care and energy policy.”
American voters split 46 – 45 percent on whether protecting Libyan civilians from Gadhafi is a goal worth having U.S. troops “fight and possibly die.” And voters say 61 – 30 percent that removing Gadhafi is not worth having American troops “fight and possibly die.”
A total of 62 percent of voters are “very confident” or “somewhat confident” that the U.S. mission to protect Libyan civilians from Gadhafi will be successful.
But 74 percent of voters are “very concerned” or “somewhat concerned” that the U.S. will get embroiled in a long-term military conflict in Libya.
The pattern of political support for the president regarding Libya is somewhat different than with the war in Afghanistan, for which public support continues to deteriorate. Now, 50 percent of voters say the U.S. should not be involved in that conflict while 41 percent says it is the right thing to do.
“Republicans have been the strongest supporters of the Democratic president’s policy. Currently, 50 percent of Republicans, 38 percent of Democrats and 38 percent of independent voters support the effort in Afghanistan,” Brown said.
“On Libya, 48 percent of Democrats but only 40 percent of Republicans and 38 percent of independent voters voice support.”
From March 22 – 28, Quinnipiac University surveyed 2,069 registered voters with a margin of error of +/- 2.2 percentage points. Live interviewers call land lines and cell phones.
 

DATA TABLES AVAILABLE AT THE BOTTOM OF THIS LINK