► Show Top 10 Hot Links

Posts Tagged ‘Rick Perry’

Clarification: Rick Perry Was Not George W. Bush’s Running Mate in Texas

by huckfunn ( 13 Comments › )
Filed under Elections 2012, George W. Bush, Headlines, History, Politics, Republican Party at July 1st, 2011 - 9:57 am

On yesterday’s thread entitled “Fox Poll: Romney leads but Perry follows close behind”,  I commented to the effect that “Rick Perry was George W. Bush’s Lieutenant Governor”. A reply to my comment stated “Which is why Perry doesn’t have a prayer in hell of getting elected as POTUS”. First of all, my comment was factually inaccurate so I must correct it and add clarification. Rick Perry was the Texas Lieutenant Governor under George W. Bush. However, Perry was not “Bush’s Lieutenant Governor”. In Texas, the Lieutenant Governor is elected separately, and not in tandem with the Governor. The relationship between the 2 is different than the offices of President and Vice President of the U.S..   Rick Perry was elected Lieutenant Governor on his own merits and not as George Bush’s running mate. See Wikipedia’s explanation here.

The Lieutenant Governor assumes the powers of the Governor of Texas when the governor is out of the state or otherwise unable to discharge the office. The Lieutenant Governor is elected separately from the Governor, rather than on the same ticket; it is therefore possible for the Governor and Lieutenant Governor to be from different political parties (which was the case during Governor George W. Bush’s first term and also during Bill Clements’s two nonconsecutive terms). The Lieutenant Governor becomes Governor if the elected Governor resigns or dies while in office (current Governor Rick Perry took office upon George W. Bush’s ascendance to the office of President of the United States on December 21, 2000).

The idea that Rick Perry was George Bush’s running mate is a common misconception and appears to be a significant negative for Perry as voters consider a GOP nominee for POTUS. I hope the Perry campaign is aware of this misconception and takes every opportunity to clarify.

 

The bad blood between Rick Perry and George W. Bush

by Phantom Ace ( 4 Comments › )
Filed under George W. Bush, Headlines, Republican Party at June 30th, 2011 - 4:50 pm

This is a very interesting article about the Bush-Perry rivalry. Clearly, these 2 men despise each other. Reports are that Perry considers Bush a fake Texan. Bush looks down on Perry.

Rick Perry was in Iowa three years ago, talking up a favored candidate, when the subject turned to George W. Bush, the president and a fellow Republican who preceded Perry as Texas governor.

Bush, or “George,” as Perry called him, was no fiscal conservative — “never was” — and his work on tort reform, a subject dear to Republican hearts, paled next to Perry’s achievements, the governor said.

“I mean, ’95, ’97, ’99,” Perry went on, elaborately ticking the years off on his fingers, “George Bush was spending money!

[….]

To a certain upper crust of Republican, “Perry is the low-rent country cousin” who lacks Bush’s prep-school polish, said R.G. Ratcliffe, a longtime student of Texas politics who is writing a book about Perry. “They see him as a hick and are embarrassed having someone like that as governor.”

Privately, the former president has spoken of his successor as a political lightweight and someone not all that bright. Perry scoffs behind closed doors at Bush’s privileged background and popularity among country-club Republicans, suggesting the New England native is a faux Texan.

[….]

But last year’s gubernatorial contest was telling. Perry was bidding for an unprecedented third term. His opponent, in an unusual primary challenge, was U.S. Sen. Kay Bailey Hutchison. Rove served as a Hutchison advisor, along with other Bush loyalists. Bush’s father, former President George H.W. Bush, endorsed Hutchison. (George W. Bush stayed neutral.) Even so, Perry came from far behind and not only beat Hutchison, but did so overwhelmingly.

There’s bad blood here.

Time To Load Up on 100W Bulbs from Texas?

by Deplorable Macker ( 215 Comments › )
Filed under Economy, Environmentalism, Republican Party at June 23rd, 2011 - 5:00 pm

Yeeee-HAWWWWWW!
OK, how many of you think the 2012 ban on 100-watt incandescent bulbs is pure BULL-SHIT! If you raised your hand, I’m sure you’ll agree that this pending legislation sitting on Governor RIck Perry’s desk is another “In Yo’ Face” measure to the Feds.
And I hope he signs it!

State lawmakers have passed a bill that allows Texans to skirt federal efforts to promote more efficient light bulbs, which ultimately pushes the swirled, compact fluorescent bulbs over the 100-watt incandescent bulbs many grew up with.
The measure, sent to Gov. Rick Perry for consideration, lets any incandescent light bulb manufactured in Texas – and sold in that state – avoid the authority of the federal government or the repeal of the 2007 energy independence act that starts phasing out some incandescent light bulbs next year.
“Let there be light,” state Rep. George Lavender, R-Texarkana, wrote on Facebook after the bill passed. “It will allow the continued manufacture and sale of incandescent light bulbs in Texas, even after the federal ban goes into effect. … It’s a good day for Texas.”

Unfortunately, we know Президент Обама will find some way for one of his government watchdogs (FTC, EPA come to mind) to slap some type of sanction on The Lone Star State as punishment for defying his decrees.
Then the People of this great nation of ours will flock in droves to Texas to help their economy out…and ours as well…by buying up all those 100-watt bulbs manufactured there! Besides, El Paso is only a nine-hour drive from The Valley of The Sun.

The Collapse of Progressivism

by Phantom Ace ( 1 Comment › )
Filed under Economy, Elections 2012, Headlines, Progressives, Republican Party, unemployment at June 23rd, 2011 - 4:23 pm

Whether it’s Rockefeller Republicanism or Democratic Progressivism, Left-wing politics has failed. Americans have had it with Big Government at home and Interventionism abroad. Filling the void is Middle American Conservatism.

The winds of change are blowing. A political rebellion is brewing. The 2012 Republican presidential nomination is taking place within historic times: the decline and fall of big-government liberalism. President Obama’s attempt to transform America is finally creating a powerful backlash. The Obama presidency lies in rubble; failure has been its defining characteristic. The country is facing an economic crisis. Unemployment is high. Growth is anemic. Gas prices are sky-high. America is choking on its debt. We are bogged down in three failed wars. Mr. Obama’s popularity is plummeting. The liberal regime – once dominant – is tottering.

[….]

Yet, at last, the Republican race is heating up with two rising stars. The dark horse is Rep. Michele Bachmann of Minnesota. She clearly won the debate in New Hampshire. Mrs. Bachmann is articulate, telegenic and feisty. She is a populist conservative who champions God, country and family. She is closely aligned with the Tea Party movement, and is serious about slashing deficits and controlling spending. She is a devout Christian, who is staunchly pro-life, pro-family and pro-gun rights. Moreover, Mrs. Bachmann is a nationalist in foreign policy. She opposes the Libyan intervention, rightly demanding that constitutional checks and balances be reimposed upon Mr. Obama’s war-making powers. With the exception of Rep. Ron Paul of Texas, she has the best grasp of one seminal reality: America can no longer afford the welfare-warfare state. The era of nation-building and global democratic revolution is over.

[….]

The other potential major candidate is Texas Gov. Rick Perry. His top aides are signaling that he is clearly thinking about running. If he does, Mr. Perry would skyrocket to the top of the heap, smashing most of his GOP rivals – including Mr. Romney. He is the anti-Romney – an authentic Texan, who has a long record of achievement and proven conservative governance. Mr. Romney talks a good game; Mr. Perry actually plays one. The rap against Mr. Perry is that he looks and sounds too much like former President George W. Bush. He has the same twang and cowboy swagger. After the disastrous Bush years, the country does not want another Texan Republican in the White House, say his critics. Maybe.

Yet, Mr. Perry has one trump card: Texas. Under his leadership, the economy has boomed. As the country remains mired in a deep recession, Texas is growing. It has created more private-sector jobs than any other state. He has reined in public spending, restored fiscal responsibility, removed regulatory red tape, maintained flexible labor markets and stood up to the unions. There is no state income tax. He is a real Reaganite. He has combined pro-growth policies with flinty social conservatism.

Bachman and Perry represent a rejection of Compassionate Conservatism. They both represent a Neo-Reagnite world view. Realistic Cation abroad and Free Markets at home. Progressivism in either its Republican or Democratic form is dead. Long live Conservatism in all its flavors!