► Show Top 10 Hot Links

Posts Tagged ‘Social Justice’

Socialism On Any Level, Leads Only To Evil

by Flyovercountry ( 154 Comments › )
Filed under Marxism, Progressives, Socialism, Tranzis at March 28th, 2014 - 7:00 am

I usually stay out of debates centered around the topic of abortion, (or its more politically correct term, women’s individual reproductive choices,) but something happened recently that made me give it another thought. Before we get there however, I’d like to disclose a couple of things to you. I am Jewish, and while our religion shares some strong similarities with Christianity, and we are very close on many beliefs, we are also worlds apart in other respects. We do not proselytize. Christians from what I’ve been told, consider it one of their sacred duties to save the souls of others. That difference right there is huge, at least in terms of today’s topic. My faith is a personal thing, and usually does not come out at all in public anymore, unless someone chimes in with a comment on one of my posts citing the Old Testament as a means to tell me where I’ll be going in the after life. Politically speaking, I guess you could either label me as a free marketeer or a libertarian leaning Republican.

I was mad beyond words when the GOP Primary debates hosted by our good friends in the alphabet media excluded every other challenge America faced at the time in deference to that top tier topic of whether or not we could find any preposterous and equally painful circumstance which would allow women to make an horrific decision or whether we would instead have a society where we advertised family planning with K-Mart’s famed Blue Light. Our budgetary problems, Iran’s pursuit of nuclear weaponry, rampant unemployment, purposeful inflation of our economy, national defense, terrorism, bureaucratic overreach of every government agency, and pretty much any other topic worth mentioning were all shelved for a one and a half hour discussion of how much each candidate really really hated abortion, (and all women in general as the meme would be turned into later.)

Election time for me has always been more about economic concerns first, and stopping our shift leftward in this country to a point beyond return. I’ve shied away from the abortion issue, primarily because I’ve always felt it to be more of a distraction from other things which would or could help our side to win elections.

Special Note:

Since I mentioned elections in one of my posts and said our side, I must give this rhetorical shout out to the Third Party Advocates, who view everything from their own very very narrow prism: All hail to the Gods of the Third Party. Hail to thee, hail to thee, hail to thee. May our discussions be worthy of your acceptance.

With that disclosure out of the way, here’s what made me think twice about the whole thing. Earlier this week, it was reported that several, as in not an isolated group of sick lunatics, of the NHS Hospitals in Britain were burning the remains of aborted babies for use as a heating source. Let that sink in for just a moment, and please be sure to control your outrage for the purposes of good, and not evil.

My friends, this is one of those seminal, “how did we get here,” moments. Britain, by and large is not a Socialist economy. On the Heritage Foundation’s Index of Economic Freedom, Britain ranks 14th in the world, two slots behind the United States, safely included in the, “mostly free,” category. (Yes, it upsets me to no end that for the first time in my life, Barack Obama has shepherded the U.S. economy from the, “Free,” category and seen us fall to the, “Mostly Free,” category. That’s another discussion entirely.) The NHS, Britain’s singular foray into that sad little experiment known as Socialism, is that shining example of what happens when the rights of the individual are sacrificed for the good of the masses.

I would suggest, not meaning to be immodest here, that some serious questions need to be asked. This is the one sector of the British economy that has been placed under the control of the top down thinkers, formerly referred to as the central planners. How is it possible that their finances are in such a state, with their nation’s smartest ruling elite apparatchiks in charge, that they felt it necessary to burn their dead as a substitute for heating oil? What does that say for the society at large, that they felt so little remorse for those dead babies that not one person with knowledge said, “perhaps we should be show more reverence, seeing as how we’re a hospital and all, for those no longer among the living?” Yes, acknowledging the Socialists reading this, there are those cultures which use cremation as a means of burying their dead, but they are not using the ceremony as a cheap means for keeping their lights lit. How is it that the very group of people who have established themselves as occupying the moral high ground in all things related to, “Social and Economic Justice,” found themselves burning dead babies for heat, against the ethics of every other civilized person on the planet? Those of us on the political right are lectured to continuously about how we are cruel for championing a system that sometimes leaves people behind, and creates winners and losers. I would argue otherwise, but I know that capitalism is not perfect, nothing is. I just also happen to no that comparing capitalism to Utopia and not against the other systems of economics put into place, is the only way to make it seem a poor choice. No where in capitalism would we ever be treated to a scene as horrific as that scene which is being played out in the hospitals of the United Kingdom.

This represents a dehumanization of our society that goes way beyond alarming. We are talking about man kind being on the edge of the proverbial abyss here. I think it’s time we stop and take stock of ourselves, before we jump off of the edge.

Economic Freedom Index: Rankings By Nation

Cross Posted from Musings of a Mad Conservative.

Meet This Year’s Liberal Pivot, Economic Justice, It’s Not Just For Deflection Anymore.

by Flyovercountry ( 91 Comments › )
Filed under Barack Obama, Democratic Party, Economy, Marxism, Misery Index, Progressives at January 14th, 2014 - 12:00 pm

This baby’s been making the rounds on facebook, as I’ve seen it now from about a half dozen of my left leaning friends there. I would suggest that you force yourself to watch the whole thing, as this is just the warm up for the strategy our President and his community organizing pals plan to put into place to distract American Voters from the fact that they’ve just recently succeeded in destroying what used to be the best health care system in the world, and left us with a disaster in its wake. That’s right my fellow gentle snow flakes, our old buddy economic justice has been taken out of moth balls, because our collective attention span does not possess an adult memory. A solid year of populist crap is what we’ll be dining on from our ruling political party, and wealth redistribution is pretty much the promise for our Utopian Promised Land.

If you can’t make it all the way through, I wouldn’t blame you. Just know that we’re going to get a solid year of this shinola.

Economic realities not withstanding, those of you with more acute powers of observation would have already recognized this argument in it’s most simplistic form, the, “Robber Baron Myth.” This accounting of events tells the story of a rapacious class of wealthy who became the top wage earners in our nation by, “climbing upon the backs of the little guys,” who of course were all born behind some mythological eight ball, and are completely incapable of overcoming the artificial obstacles those nefarious rich have been placing in their way since time began.

There are just a few points that I’d like to address before moving on, just some pop flies to shag for the practice I’ll need to help combat this lunacy during the run up to the 2014 Midterms. First the cheap shot, dig that spooky music playing in the background. Why are our liberal friends so incapable of making any kind of a point without the cheap and sleazy appeal to the darker emotions? Now, on to the rest of it.

An open letter to the idiots peddling the above video:

Dear community organizing punks who’ve taken to social media in order to peddle your crap,

There are a few things that I’d like to say to you in regards to your wealth redistribution wet dreams. First, all of man kind was born in poverty, with nothing. We did not just appear on this continent with $54 Trillion lying around, some of which was grabbed by the poor, and most of which was procured by the wealthy, who managed to grab a larger share by, “crawling on the backs of those less fortunate.” Any wealth that exists anywhere in the world was in some fashion or another created by someone. The entire reason why America has the unprecedented level of wealth, $54 Trillion worth, according to your video, is precisely because we’ve instituted a political and economic system that allows those who create that wealth to keep the lion’s share of it. The people in the Sudan are not missing cable television because we here in America have stolen it from them. They are missing cable television because when your political system dictates that you slaughter a sizable portion of your own people, chances are pretty good that one of those slaughtered was the person who would have brought cable television to your society. Remove those incentives to create at your own peril, but just realize that the Soviet Union, Cuba, and Venezuela serve as telling laboratories as to what redistributed wealth does for a society. The next way to make this point, and this really is not so diplomatic as the previous method, is this. Who’s business is it anyhow? If somebody else has their own jet airplane, so what? Promoting jealousy for your own political ambition is one of those things in life that is just plain evil. Punishing others, while it may lend itself to a feeling of catharsis for the weak minded, truly will do nothing to help in either the short or long term. I will have no increase in the groceries on my own table simply because some community organizing punk stole into the homes of successful people and confiscated half their groceries.

If there is one positive thing about this six minute unbridled plea for Socialism, it is that the narrator admits that Socialism does not work. I guess they have a new name for it now. Let’s talk for a moment about economic justice or fairness. How did we get to a place in our world where it is suddenly fair or just to rob somebody, and distribute the fruits of that robbery? Just because we have banded ourselves into a society and figured out how to use the government and the laws passed by that government to perform our acts of thievery on our behalf does not change the nature of these acts. Those piles of money referred to in the video represent something more than just wealth accumulated, they represent the extent to which a person or a group of people were able to create benefit for their fellow human beings. There is not one single transaction in America’s private sector that is not voluntary for all parties concerned. When you go to Walmart and purchase that garden hose for $8, you have made the decision that you’d rather have the hose than the $8, and Walmart would rather have the $8 than the hose. All parties concerned feel that they have what they want and that they have gotten the better of the transaction. People capable of buying their own jet airplanes are people who have made a lot of people feel that they’ve received value for their transactions. Yes the executives of Shell Oil and Exxon Mobile have done well for themselves over the years, but my guess is that you drove to work today in a vehicle powered by gasoline, and not in a covered wagon or by walking there. Those motor vehicles by the way have probably served to expand your area for procuring employment, enabling you to search for an optimal paying job, and not merely relying on what you could find within walking distance of your home.

One more point before moving on, nothing is mentioned in this video about the mobility between the economic classes that exists in our nation precisely due to our free market system, and does not exist by the way in any society that uses Socialism as its template. Those people in the bottom 20% this year may not be in that strata next year, and the same holds true for those in the top. People who are just starting out are seldom as well to do as those who have been in the game for a while. The only effect that the minimum wage laws will have will be to prevent those at the bottom rungs of the ladder from getting started. The policies advocated by this crowd are the very things responsible for creating the very things that they’re whining about. Ironic, and yet still unfair.

Warmest regards, John

On Friday we got another one of those ridiculous reports from the Department of Labor that told us how great our economy is humming along. The top line unemployment number, according the Department of Labor is now at 6.7% Never mind the changes in accounting definitions put into place by the Obama Labor Department that have now made any reports that they publish nothing more than a cruel joke. Never mind that several of their employees, paid for by the way with our tax dollars, have admitted to a systematic falsifying of the figures used to generate these works of fiction. When you dig into these reports, things look even worse than anyone would have ever suspected.

Fortunately, the folks at Investor’s Business Daily have taken the trouble to do that digging. Here is some of what they found.

6.3 million: Net new jobs created since Obama’s recovery started in June 2009
13.8 million: New jobs that would have been created had Obama’s kept pace with the average of the previous 10 recoveries.
———————————————————————————–
3.6%: Growth in private jobs since Obama took office.
43%: Growth in the number of temp jobs.
———————————————————————————–
91.8 million: Number of people not in the labor force as of December.
525,000: Increase since November.
11.2 million: Increase since Obama took office.
————————————————————————————-
6.7%: Jobless rate 54 months into Obama’s recovery.
5.1%: Unemployment rate 54 months into George W. Bush’s “jobless” recovery.
————————————————————————————-
13.1%: Jobless rate in Dec. using a broader measure — U6 — which includes people marginally attached to labor force or working part time for economic reasons.
9.2%: Average U6 rate in Bush’s eight years in office.
————————————————————————————-
26%: Share of adults who say at least one household member is unemployed, based on IBD/TIPP Poll data.
10%: Share who say a household member had work hours cut because of ObamaCare.
————————————————————————————-
3.9 million: Number of people who’ve been jobless 27 weeks or more in December.
2.7 million: That number when Obama took office.
————————————————————————————-
37 weeks: Average length of unemployment in Dec.
20 weeks: Average length when Obama took office.
————————————————————————————-
861,000: Number of discouraged workers in Dec.
734,000: Number when Obama took office.
————————————————————————————-
58.6%: Current employment-to-population ratio.
61%: Ratio when Obama took office.
62%: Average employment-to-population ratio in the 30 years before Obama took office.
————————————————————————————-
$1,006: Drop in median household income during the 2007-09 recession.
$2,535: Drop in median income after the recession ended in June 2009, according to Sentier Research.
————————————————————————————-

As I stated before, this is all an attempt at deflection. The marching orders from the ruling political class is that we should blame the disaster of Barack Obama’s economic policies on the lack of populist appeal. Wealth redistribution, feel good minimum wage increases, and flat out jealousy are the mantras we’ll be hearing for the next 10 months. I guess the hope is that if your lust to punish those who you are jealous of, will make you forget that it was this populist baloney that has destroyed our economy in the first place. Remember, Barack Obama and not George W. Bush has been President for the last five years.

I know that I’ve shown it before, but once again the robber baron crap has been pointed to as America’s main problem. So, here is Dr. Milton Friedman with his brilliance to lay waste to that particular fallacy.

Cross Posted from Musings of a Mad Conservative.

America Could go the Way of Argentina

by Phantom Ace ( 53 Comments › )
Filed under Barack Obama, Economy, Liberal Fascism, Progressives at April 21st, 2010 - 8:00 pm

Many Americans are in denial of the obvious, this nation is in decline. Often the argument I have heard is that America always bounces back from a crisis. But one must also ask themselves, how many times can you keep getting back up? Well, there once was another nation built by immigrants that was the 4th richest nation on Earth and is now a 3rd World country. It is Argentina. It’s capital, Buenos Aires, was called the Paris of the Americas. The tango was all the rage around the world and even Greek shipping magnate Aristotle Onassis got his start there. Then it all came to an abrupt end.

In the 1940’s there was a young, charismatic politician offering Argentina hope and change. His name was Juan Peron and his Ideology was called Peronism or Justicialism. Notice this term Justicialism? Well it’s no coincidence the New Left Progressives talk about Social Justice. In much the same way American Leftists were fascinated with 3rd World dictators, Juan Peron was an admirer of the hip cool tyrant of his times: Mussolini. Well, he did carry out his change of Argentina and turned it into an economic basket-case.

A century ago, if you had told typical citizens of Argentina (which at that time was enjoying the fourth-highest per capita income in the world) that it would decline to become just the 76th richest nation on a per capita basis in 2010, they probably would not have found it believable. They might have responded, “This could not happen; we are a nation rich in natural resources, with a great climate for agriculture. Our people are well educated and largely descended from European stock. We have property rights, the rule of law and an open free-market economy.”

But the fact is, Argentina has been going downhill for eight decades, and it has the second-worst credit ranking in the entire world – only Venezuela has a lower ranking. Argentina, despite its natural resources and human capital, has managed to throw it all away. Argentina did not become relatively poor because of having been involved in destructive conflicts. It became poor because it has had a series of both democratically elected leaders and non-elected dictators who never missed an opportunity to make the wrong economic decisions. It is, once again, trying to renege on paying the principal and interest on Argentine government bonds to foreign bondholders, and hence New York state (where many of the bonds are serviced) may take further action against Argentina, including fines and asset seizures.

In the 1930s, the Argentine government increased its interventions in the private economy. Juan Peron took over in 1946 and ended up nationalizing the railroads, the merchant marine, public utilities, public transport and other parts of the private economy. For much of the past half-century, Argentina has engaged in a series of erratic monetary policies, often resulting in periods of very high inflation and economic stagnation. Because of their political power, the unions have been coddled, resulting in unsustainable wage-and-benefit programs. Excessive government spending has caused recurrent fiscal meltdowns, where both foreign and domestic debt-holders have lost many of their investments.

Read the rest: Could the U.S. become Argentina?

Let Argentina be a warning for America. Barack Hussein Obama is our Juan Peron and is implementing the same policies. This tyrannical Progressive economic ideology needs to be defeated. If not there will be an article somewhere 100 years from now discussing America’s economic decline.

UPDATE by savage: Here is an article entitled ‘Don’t Cry for me, America”

Beck and the Church: The Meaning of ‘Social Justice’

by Konservo ( 111 Comments › )
Filed under Media, Politics, Progressives, Religion at March 14th, 2010 - 11:30 am

In the Christian obsessed with “social justice” it isn’t easy to discern whether charity is flourishing or faith is expiring. Nicolás Gómez Dávila

Glenn Beck is being criticized for telling folks to leave churches in which “social justice” is casually mentioned as a tenet or principle of the faith. News Hounds says that Progressive and Conservative religious groups are upset with Beck.

Beck is a very religious person. He talks a lot about God and Jesus on his show. The problem here, seems to be an assumption and a misunderstanding.

The assumption:

Beck has also done a lot of reading. He’s read modern and historical documents which outline Progressivism, the cancer of American politics. Anyone who has done this or similar reading, or knows the ins and outs of Progressivism, is well aware that “Social Justice” is a term used pretty much synonymously with “Socialism.”

For example, here’s a taste of how the Green Party of Canada construes ‘social justice’ (I’ll embolden key points):

We assert that the key to social justice is the equitable distribution of social and natural resources, both locally and globally, to meet basic human needs unconditionally, and to ensure that all citizens have full opportunities for personal and social development.

This requires:

  • a just organization of the world and a stable world economy which will close the widening gap between rich and poor, both within and between countries; balance the flow of resources from South to North; and lift the burden of debt on poor countries which prevents their development.
  • In other words, ‘social justice,’ here stands for redistribution of wealth under the guise of protecting the environment.

    Wiki describes ‘social justice’ as

    a concept that some use to describe the movement towards a socially just world. In this context, social justice is based on the concepts of human rights and equality and involves a greater degree of economic egalitarianism through progressive taxation, income redistribution, or even property redistribution, policies aimed toward achieving that which developmental economists refer to as more equality of opportunity and equality of outcome than may currently exist in some societies or are available to some classes in a given society.

    In other words, ‘social justice,’ here, is one of the key components of Progressivism.

    Beck is very excitable and often things spring from his mouth that are factually inaccurate or could be construed as such. But that is not the case here. Beck merely assumes that the sense in which he uses ‘social justice’ is understood by the constant warnings he gives about Progressives and Socialists on his show. I think this is a reasonable assumption.

    But there is also a misunderstanding.

    Consider this, from Restoring Social Justice:

    We’re troubled by the extent of social breakdown today.

    We’re troubled by how it afflicts individual lives and how it affects our society in general.

    We’re troubled by the fact that a teenage boy going to school in one of our major cities may learn more about a life of delinquency than he does about a future filled with hope and opportunity.

    We’re troubled that four out of 10 children and nearly seven out of 10 black children in America are born to unmarried mothers, a fact that will cast a long shadow down the course of a child’s life.

    We’re also troubled by welfare state responses to problems like these. It’s not only that welfare state responses discourage independence and self-sufficiency and that costly programs have proven ineffective at stopping social breakdown. We’re also troubled because some of these approaches actually make people and society worse in the process. Welfare state programs have sometimes hurt the very people they were intended to help.

    This group is using the same term, ‘social justice,’ not as a means of promoting Big national and, indeed, global Government, but as a the goal which a free society can achieve without becoming a welfare state.

    Concerning religion, you have to determine whether or not the ‘social justice’ your religious institution advocates resembles that of the former examples or that of the latter example.

    Cross-posted at my blog