► Show Top 10 Hot Links

Posts Tagged ‘U.K.’

As Traditional Allies Refuse To Attend Obama’s Nuclear Security Summit, Widening Rifts Are Exposed

by WrathofG-d ( 107 Comments › )
Filed under Nuclear Weapons at April 14th, 2010 - 2:00 pm

Much-to-do has been made of Benjamin Netanyahu’s decision not to attend the ‘nuclear security summit’ being held by President Obama.  (Israel sent an intelligence minister instead)  What has been remarkably under reported however is that Bibi is not the only  traditionally key U.S. ally not to be attending or feeling a coldness towards the United States as a result of President Obama’s repeated humiliation of America’s traditional allies.  Among others, Britain, Australia and Saudi Arabia also stayed home. (England is sending Foreign Secretary David Miliband).

Specifically, there is speculation that the refusal to attend by Great Britain’s Prime Minister (although they used the official excuse of needing time to campaign) is more evidence of a widening rift created by President Obama between the two traditional allies’ once special relationship.

I suspect there is far more to it than mere concern over missing a day or two on the election trail. This is almost certainly payback for Obama’s shoddy treatment of the Prime Minister during his previous two trips to the US. It is important not to underestimate the degree to which Brown was utterly humiliated when he went to the White House in March last year and was denied the courtesy of an official press conference or an official dinner with the president. To add insult to injury, Brown was made a laughingstock internationally when it was revealed the president had given him a derisive gift of 25 DVDs. In September, more embarrassment was to follow when Brown traveled to New York to attend the UN General Assembly, with President Obama declining to meet with his British counterpart after no less than five official requests.

There is certainly no love lost between the two leaders, and Brown’s decision to stay away from Washington has all the hallmarks of a significant transatlantic spat…

Although practically unreported, President Obama seems to be chasing our traditional allies away and realigning America with the totalitarian dictators of the world at a blistering pace. This destruction of traditional alliances however doesn’t only apply to Israel and Great Britain.

As remarkable as it is, the fact that neither British Prime Minister Gordon Brown nor Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu are attending President Obama’s nuclear security summit in Washington Monday and Tuesday is not altogether surprising.

Relations with both countries — Israel in particular — have grown strained under Obama. Combined with Afghan President Hamid Karzai’s recent defiance of the administration, questions are growing about the president’s ability to maintain important relationships.

“It is a curious state of affairs when relations with our major democratic allies are all wobbly at once,” said Michael Green, a former foreign policy adviser to President George W. Bush, who also listed Japan and South Korea as traditional allies whose relationships with the U.S. have frayed under Obama.

The president’s critics, many of them from the Bush administration, say the summit absences — heads of state from Australia and Saudia Arabia also are not attending — are the most glaring examples of a floundering foreign policy that treats rivals and enemies better than friends.

“He seems to want to engage rivals, even enemies, more than spend time with friends and allies,” said David Kramer, a top State Department official in the Bush administration.

Elliot Abrams, another former top Bush administration foreign policy adviser, said the current White House was guilty of “diplomatic malpractice.”

“In his treatment of Karzai and Netanyahu, the president has shown an odd understanding of what it means to be a U.S. ally. Surely it should mean that inevitable disagreements are handled privately whenever possible. Surely it should mean avoiding steps that seek to weaken or humiliate a foreign leader,” Abrams said.

Though relations with Karzai grew strained at the end of the Bush administration, the Obama administration’s relationship with the Afghan president — the leader of the country that is currently home to the biggest concentration of U.S. military forces on the planet — has been a soap opera.

During Obama’s trip to Kabul just two weeks ago, he did not praise Karzai and his top officials made clear he was there to put pressure on the Afghan president to do a better job of governance and rooting out corruption.

Karzai responded by denouncing Western interference in last summer’s elections and by talking of joining the Taliban himself.

“Surely we should be treating [Karzai and Netanyahu] better than we treat enemies like [Syrian President] Bashar al-Asad or [Venezuelan President Hugo] Chavez, or the Russian and Chinese leaders, who if not enemies are certainly not friends,” Abrams said.

Even major European leaders got meetings with Obama this week only at the last minute. German Chancellor Angela Merkel’s one-on-one meeting with Obama was scheduled for Tuesday late on Sunday, only after meetings with the leaders of India, Kazakhstan, South Africa, Pakistan, Nigeria, China, Jordan, Malaysia, Ukraine, Armenia and Turkey.

9 Year Old Undergoes Gender Transition

by WrathofG-d ( 93 Comments › )
Filed under UK, World at September 23rd, 2009 - 10:24 am

Welcome to our upside-down world where long before a child actually has any sense of true identity they already believe they are having an gender identity crisis.

A boy of nine has returned to school as a girl in what is believed to be Britain’s youngest gender swap.

Children at the school in southern England were told the child had left and been replaced by a female pupil.

The child came dressed in girls’ uniform with long hair tied in a pink ribbon.

The case comes after it was revealed yesterday that a 12-year-old boy had started his first term at secondary school in southern England as a girl.

Some parents at the school have criticised staff for not informing them before telling children about the gender change at a special assembly.

{The Article} {Another}

Parents of childen at this U.K. school were understandably upset, but maybe not for what you would think.  They weren’t really going to bother with the fact that a 9 year old felt he/she needed to get a gender change…no, I guess that is just normal these days.  (Reminder! The child was under 10 years old)

The class parents weren’t upset with the gender swap itself, but with the way the school handled the issue.

Many parents felt they should have been informed in advance so they could better prepare their children. However, The Beaumont Society, a British transgender organization, felt it was inappropriate to advertise the gender change at all, feeling it would only lead to bullying and teasing of the 9-year-old in question.

Many parents felt they should have been informed in advance so they could better prepare their children.

I highly suggest you click the link above to the group the school reached out to for advice.  Wow!

From reading the comments here regarding this issue, it seems that this 9 year old’s gender transition is simply the tip of the iceberg of a much larger growing trend, and social movement.  It seems that 9 year old children having gender changes is the norm, and if you think otherwise it is YOU who have the problem!

TisKismet 10:43:50 AM Sep 22 2009

Report This!

I am confused about why so many are so prone to believe that a person’s biological state is the surest sign of gender. We KNOW for a fact, scientifically, that people are born with physiological gender anomalies all the time; why couldn’t or shouldn’t the psychological identity be deemed the most accurate? (emphasis added)

Yea how closed minded of me to think that gender might have something to do with biology!?