► Show Top 10 Hot Links

Posts Tagged ‘Wilsonianism’

The Rubio Doctrine

by Phantom Ace ( 29 Comments › )
Filed under Elections 2010, Elections 2012, Politics, Republican Party, Special Report at April 20th, 2011 - 12:43 pm

As someone who once was a big fan of Sen. Marco Rubio (R-FL.), I must say I am greatly disappointed in him. Here was someone who I could relate too. We came from the same roots of Upper Middle Class landowning Hispanics and we are both Rightwing Latins. During his 2010 campaign he actually called out Islam by name and mentioned it’s historical Imperialism. Now that he is in Washington he has fallen prey to the Wilsonian “spread Democracy” ideology. He actually believes Islamic nations like Afghanistan can have Democracy. Rubio also called for an invasion and occupation of Libya, a war that benefits Al-Qaeda and the French oil interests. He is either naive or the GOP establishment got to him.

Sen. Marco Rubio sailed into office on the tea-party wave, wagging his finger at the Obama administration’s fiscal mischief. But in the Senate, foreign policy has become his passion.

[…]

Rubio has vocally opposed an increase to the federal government’s debtlimit and chastised the president for not being “serious” about deficit reduction. He has also thrown cold water on Republicans. Before the Senate adjourned for spring recess, Rubio bucked leadership and opposed the Boehner–White House deal to keep the government running, since he found the attached spending cuts insufficient.

But foreign policy is Rubio’s calling. He relishes his spot on the Foreign Relations Committee, where he has been tapped to be a ranking subcommittee member. His portfolio focuses on the Western Hemisphere, building relationships with neighbors on trade and terrorism. His work from that post is piled about the room.

[…]

“Ultimately, if we can provide a level of security there, the Afghans have a chance to build a functional state for themselves,” Rubio says. “You can read about these things, but I think when you visit these places, you get to interact with people and see things firsthand.”

Read the rest: Rubio’s Foreign Policy

Clearly Marco Rubio is being misled. As someone who grew up in the same type of family as I did, he should know Democracy is not compatible with Islamic societies. He knows the history of our ancestors very well and their 700 year fight with Arabic Islamic aggression. Clearly he has naively bought into the so called “freedom agenda” and is blind to the consequences of it in Iraq and Egypt.

On Economic policy, Rubio is spot on and I’m with him 100%. On foreign policy him and I have to part ways. As he said himself, no politician is a Messiah. Rubio is no savior and although I would vote for him as President or his Senate re-election, I would do so with without my previous enthusiasm.

Que Lastima!

US should stay out of Libya

by Phantom Ace ( 303 Comments › )
Filed under Barack Obama, Democratic Party, Elections 2012, George W. Bush, Leftist-Islamic Alliance, Liberal Fascism, Libya, Progressives, Republican Party at March 8th, 2011 - 11:30 am

In recent weeks prominent Republicans like Mitt Romney, Sarah Palin, John McCain and Mitch McDonnell have called for US intervention in Libya. As a Conservative I view this attitude as madness. It seems as if the elites of the GOP, including Mrs. Palin, are under the influence of Wilsonian Progressivism. There is no US vital interest to intervene in Libya. The battle is between the forces of Muamar Qaddafi and a coalition of Islamists and tribesman. It is a battle of two evils and one that we should hope drags out and cripple Libya for decades. The fact that so many so called Conservatives haven’t abandoned the ridiculous and progressive “Freedom Agenda” of the Bush years shows the GOP hasn’t learned their lesson at the foreign policy level.

A good many people across the political spectrum—including some members of the Obama administration—are pressuring the president to intervene militarily in Libya. Much of the commentary has focused on establishing a no-fly zone, but there have been calls as well for enforcing a no-drive zone, or for arming or otherwise assisting regime opponents.

Those making this case appeal to a mixture of morality and realpolitik. They argue that by intervening we will prevent the slaughter of innocents and at the same time demonstrate our willingness to make good on expressions of support for freedom and security.

[…]

There are many reasons to avoid making Libya the center of U.S. concerns in the region. Libya is far from the most important country in the Middle East—both in terms of political influence and its impact on the oil market. American policy makers would be wiser to focus on what they can do to see that Egypt’s transition proceeds smoothly, that Saudi Arabia remains stable, and that Iran does not.

Intervening militarily in Libya would be a potentially costly distraction for the U.S. military. It is already overextended in Iraq and Afghanistan. The last thing it needs is another vaguely defined intervention in a place where U.S. interests are less than vital.

Read the rest: The U.S. Should Keep Out of Libya

I normally don’t agree with Richard Haass, but he is spot on here. The US military is already involved in two conflicts and is stretched out globally. We don’t have the money and would have to borrow from the Chinese plus others to pay for this useless intervention. I just laugh at how these hypocritical Progressive Democrats like John Kerry (D-Mass) are now all gung ho for a military adventure. These were the same people who undermined Iraq. This shows the only reason the Democrats opposed the Iraq War, which was in reality a Progressive action, was because a Republican undertook it. Now the Democrats who have lead America into the majority of its wars in the last 100 years, some of which were questionable (the exceptions were WWII and Korea), are back to their Progressive interventionist ways.

The Republican Party should resist this Progressive interventionist nonsense. The Republican House of Representatives should demand a resolution to authorize the use of force and force a debate on this subject.  If Obama launches an attack without Congressional approval, they need to hammer him without mercy. Instead, the elites of the GOP have the “spread Democracy at the point of the gun” ideology, which is not a Conservative foreign policy view, and will support Obama. They will be enabling another useless intervention where there is no economic gain for this nation.

 A Conservative foreign policy is based in reality, one that would be to protect America’s economic interest, support our allies and stand up to Islamic Imperialism. Bush’s Freedom Agenda was not Conservative, it was rooted in Progressive ideology. His claim that freedom at home depends on freedom abroad was utter nonsense. Freedom at home depends on a strong 2nd Amendment, limited federal powers, constitutional based court appointees, economic liberty and powerful a military. What type of system other nations, including allies, have is not our problem. I will take 10 Pinochets over 100 Hamid Karzais. Woodrow Wilson was an evil racist and vile man. No true Conservative should ever embrace his twisted and sick ideology.

If the Republicans are going to run in 2012 on spreading democracy at the point of a gun, they will not win. Many Conservatives are tired of this Progressive Woodrow Wilson Ideology infesting GOP leaders. We need a foreign policy version of the Tea Party. It’s time for Conservatives to rise up and destroy the Wilsonian foreign policy establishment of the GOP.

Catch and Release of Taliban Fighters

by Phantom Ace ( 192 Comments › )
Filed under Barack Obama, Democratic Party, Dhimmitude, George W. Bush, Islam, Islamists, Jihad, Leftist-Islamic Alliance, Multiculturalism, Progressives, Republican Party, Taliban, Tranzis at December 7th, 2010 - 3:30 pm

Can you imagine in WWII, which was the last time America fought with all its might to crush an enemy, that we would catch and release German or Japanese fighters. Of Course not, America’s establishment back then still wasn’t as corrupted with Wilsonian or Tranzi ideology. Say what you want about FDR’s domestic policies but when it came to going after our enemies, he was a real war President unlike the current one or the previous one. As a history buff I often wonder if we had the current leadership (Republican or Democrat) would we have won WWII? I think not and this latest story about the US releasing Taliban suspects at the behest of the corrupt Karzai regime confirms my beliefs that our nation has weak leadership.

More than 500 suspected Taliban fighters detained by U.S. forces have been released from custody at the urging of Afghan government officials, angering both American troops and some Afghans who oppose the policy on the grounds that many of those released return to the battlefield to kill NATO soldiers and Afghan civilians.

And those numbers understate the problem, military officials say. They do not include suspected Taliban fighters held in small combat outposts or other forward operating bases throughout the region who are released before they ever become part of the official detainee population.

An Afghan official who spoke on condition of anonymity said that President Hamid Karzai’s government has personally sought the release of as many as 700 suspected Taliban fighters since July, including some mid-level leaders. “Corruption is not just based on the amount of money that is wasted but wasted lives when Taliban return only to kill more NATO forces and civilians,” said the official, who opposes what he considers corruption in the Karzai administration.

Read the rest: Catch-and-release of Taliban fighters in Afghanistan angers troops

This is a disgrace and more proof that the Afghan war is a waste. We are propping up a vile pedophile regime to prevent another vile pedophile Islamist regime from taking power. In reality, we should level that place as Rome did Carthage to send a message to our enemies. We will not do this because our elites, who were educated at Ivy League schools, are Internationalists who believe that all humans and cultures are equal. This is nonsense that flies in the face of human reality.

Our brave and undermanned armed forces are doing all they can carrying out naive academic nation building theories to satisfy Ivy League geeks who view them as playthings.  Until we get real leadership that is based on reality and national, not international/global interest, America will continue our slow bleed war, increasing debt and our adversaries will continue to get stronger. This catch and release of the Taliban is just another example of our weak elites. We need leaders who will formulate a Jacksonian based National interest foreign policy.