First time visitor? Learn more.

Darwin and Marx

by savage ( 17 Comments › )
Filed under LGF at March 22nd, 2009 - 10:58 am

A user here at LGF2 sent me a nice little email the other day. Here it goes:

I don’t want to beat this 1.0 stuff to death and I don’t want to get you
guys in a pickle so I didn’t post this but I thought you might find it
interesting. I was reading the latest issue of Intelligence Report which
is published by The Southern Poverty Law Center which is delivered
monthly here at the Police Department and noticed something interesting.
This issue lists 926 groups the SPLC has identified as “Hate Groups”. As
I was looking over the various groups listed I noticed this one,
“Charles Darwin Research Institute, Port Huron, MI”. I looked them up on
the web and found their URL at http://www.charlesdarwinresearch.org/ .

Now, I don’t know anything about this group and I’m not the one saying they
are a hate group (as noted above). However, IF I was to use the logic
that Charles SEEMS to use at 1.0 then here is my question:
IF the “Charles Darwin Research Institute” is identified as a hate group
by the SPLC and IF they promote Charles Darwin and
IF Charles Johnson promotes Charles Darwin
THEN are we to conclude that 1.0 could be listed in the Intelligence
Report as a hate group as well?
Some might say yes.

Well, I took a look over at the Charles Darwin Research Institute and this popped out and smacked me in the face.

Let us be explicit about the problem faced by Darwinian psychology — political correctness. Its central thesis is the environmental determinism of all important human traits. It stems from Marxism and a belief that social and economic oppression are the cause of all significant individual and group behavioral differences. The Marxist hold on liberal political sentiment is so extensive many of us think that way without realizing it. We censor ourselves lest we even dare to think the forbidden thoughts.

There you go…. I’ll let everyone draw their own conclusions.

savage

Tags: , , ,

Comments

Comments and respectful debate are both welcome and encouraged.

Comments are the sole opinion of the comment writer, just as each thread posted is the sole opinion or post idea of the administrator that posted it or of the readers that have written guest posts for the Blogmocracy.

Obscene, abusive, or annoying remarks may be deleted or moved to spam for admin review, but the fact that particular comments remain on the site in no way constitutes an endorsement of their content by any other commenter or the admins of this Blogmocracy.

We're not easily offended and don't want people to think they have to walk on eggshells around here (like at another place that shall remain nameless) but of course, there is a limit to everything.

Play nice!

Comments are closed.

Back to the Top

The Blogmocracy

website design was Built By All of Us