First time visitor? Learn more.

Obama may try to make Israel give up Nukes

by Phantom Ace ( 111 Comments › )
Filed under Anti-semitism, Dhimmitude, Islamic Invasion, Islamic Supremacism, Israel, Jihad, Leftist-Islamic Alliance at May 6th, 2009 - 9:15 am

Barack Obama is rumored to be seeking to make Israel join the nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT). Should that happen, Israel would be forced to give up its nukes. This is actually a key Iranian demand, and Obama being a good Dhimmi seem ready to comply.

EXCLUSIVE: Secret U.S.-Israel nuclear accord in jeopardy

President Obama’s efforts to curb the spread of nuclear weapons threaten to expose and derail a 40-year-old secret U.S. agreement to shield Israel’s nuclear weapons from international scrutiny, former and current U.S. and Israeli officials and nuclear specialists say.

The issue will likely come to a head when Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu meets with Mr. Obama on May 18 in Washington. Mr. Netanyahu is expected to seek assurances from Mr. Obama that he will uphold the U.S. commitment and will not trade Israeli nuclear concessions for Iranian ones.

This is another example of my theory. Israel is the new Serbia! Israel is the next nation that the US and EU will sacrifice to please their Islamic overlords. Without Nukes, NATO can attack Israel, like they did Serbia to give land to Muslims.

Question readers, Why does the US/Europe always help Muslims against Non Muslims? I really would like to know, is it possible that US and EU are secretly controlled by Muslims? I have no explantion for this bizare policy of helping Islam. After Israel, Spain whose lands will be given to Islam.

Tags: , , , ,

Comments

Comments and respectful debate are both welcome and encouraged.

Comments are the sole opinion of the comment writer, just as each thread posted is the sole opinion or post idea of the administrator that posted it or of the readers that have written guest posts for the Blogmocracy.

Obscene, abusive, or annoying remarks may be deleted or moved to spam for admin review, but the fact that particular comments remain on the site in no way constitutes an endorsement of their content by any other commenter or the admins of this Blogmocracy.

We're not easily offended and don't want people to think they have to walk on eggshells around here (like at another place that shall remain nameless) but of course, there is a limit to everything.

Play nice!

Comments are closed.

Back to the Top

The Blogmocracy

website design was Built By All of Us