First time visitor? Learn more.

AG Holder proposes updated hate crime legislation

by bar ( 54 Comments › )
Filed under Barack Obama, Crime at June 17th, 2009 - 9:22 am

WASHINGTON (AP) – Attorney General Eric Holder said Tuesday that recent killings show the need for a tougher U.S. hate crimes law to stop “violence masquerading as political activism.”
[….]
The violence, he said, “reminds us of the potential threat posed by violent extremists and the tragedy that ensues when reasoned discourse is replaced by armed confrontation.”

In order to stop that violence, he said, Congress should pass an updated version of hate crimes legislation, in order to more effectively prosecute those who commit violent attacks based on gender, disability, or sexual orientation.
[….]
“We will not tolerate murder, or the threat of violence, masquerading as political activism,” Holder said. “So let me be clear, the Justice Department will use every tool at its disposal to protect the rights ensured under our Constitution.”

I haven’t seen any violence masquerading as political activism, unless he is talking about ELF or the Weather Underground and Bill Ayers or the Rev Wright. These latest acts of violence have not been condoned by the conservative movement masquerading as political activism.

Last time I checked, murder was illegal. But that doesn’t stop people from committing it. Then how is this new legislation going to change that? Is the Nazi going to say, “I would kill that nonwhite guy but I don’t want to be charged with a ‘hate crime’?”

And why can’t violent acts against any person just be a crime, why does acts against minorities garner special attention? We all know only white guys can be haters, so a violent act committed by them against one of these groups will be charged with a more severe crime then say if a gay guy commits the same act against them. How is that equal protection under the law?

Tags: , ,

Comments

Comments and respectful debate are both welcome and encouraged.

Comments are the sole opinion of the comment writer, just as each thread posted is the sole opinion or post idea of the administrator that posted it or of the readers that have written guest posts for the Blogmocracy.

Obscene, abusive, or annoying remarks may be deleted or moved to spam for admin review, but the fact that particular comments remain on the site in no way constitutes an endorsement of their content by any other commenter or the admins of this Blogmocracy.

We're not easily offended and don't want people to think they have to walk on eggshells around here (like at another place that shall remain nameless) but of course, there is a limit to everything.

Play nice!

Comments are closed.

Back to the Top

The Blogmocracy

website design was Built By All of Us