First time visitor? Learn more.

This is what happens when the actuary replaces the doctor

by tqcincinnatus ( 64 Comments › )
Filed under Barack Obama, Healthcare, Politics at August 19th, 2009 - 3:24 pm

You get 6,000 much-needed surgeries postponed because they don’t fit into this year’s budget.

Vancouver patients needing neurosurgery, treatment for vascular diseases and other medically necessary procedures can expect to wait longer for care, NDP health critic Adrian Dix said Monday.

Dix said a Vancouver Coastal Health Authority document shows it is considering chopping more than 6,000 surgeries in an effort to make up for a dramatic budgetary shortfall that could reach $200 million.

“This hasn’t been announced by the health authority … but these cuts are coming,” Dix said, citing figures gleaned from a leaked executive summary of “proposed VCH surgical reductions.”

The health authority confirmed the document is genuine, but said it represents ideas only.

“It is a planning document. It has not been approved or implemented,” said spokeswoman Anna Marie D’Angelo.

Dr. Brian Brodie, president of the BC Medical Association, called the proposed surgical cuts “a nightmare.”

“Why would you begin your cost-cutting measures on medically necessary surgery? I just can’t think of a worse place,” Brodie said.

Well gooooooooollie, Sgt. Cahtah, who’d have thought that a single-payer, public-option, bureaucratically-budgeted socialised health care system would have to postpone needed surgeries??? 

And in response to Dr. Brodie’s question, “Why would you begin your cost-cutting measures on medically necessary surgery?”, the answer from Obama and Co. is that you don’t.  You begin them by cutting out all the old and infirmed drains on the system, i.e. decision by death panel….

Tags: ,

Comments

Comments and respectful debate are both welcome and encouraged.

Comments are the sole opinion of the comment writer, just as each thread posted is the sole opinion or post idea of the administrator that posted it or of the readers that have written guest posts for the Blogmocracy.

Obscene, abusive, or annoying remarks may be deleted or moved to spam for admin review, but the fact that particular comments remain on the site in no way constitutes an endorsement of their content by any other commenter or the admins of this Blogmocracy.

We're not easily offended and don't want people to think they have to walk on eggshells around here (like at another place that shall remain nameless) but of course, there is a limit to everything.

Play nice!

Comments are closed.

Back to the Top

The Blogmocracy

website design was Built By All of Us