First time visitor? Learn more.

2012 Update: 10 States Pending Presidential Birth Certificate Legislation

by Deplorable Macker ( 168 Comments › )
Filed under Barack Obama, Democratic Party, Elections 2012 at January 31st, 2011 - 4:30 pm

In case you haven’t been keeping up with this development, Arizona leads a pack of ten states (so far) with pending legislation which, if passed and signed into law by their respective Governors, which would require any and all candidates for President to produce for proof their genuine Birth Certificates to the appropriate State departments handling such vetting, in order to be listed on that state’s ballot.
The ten states which have pending legislation on this subject control 107 Electoral Votes for the 2012 Election. Since Arizona leads the pack for the moment, let’s see what HB 2544 says:

Within ten days after submittal of the names of the candidates, the national political party committee shall submit an affidavit of the presidential candidate in which the presidential candidate states the candidate’s citizenship and age and shall append to the affidavit documents that prove that the candidate is a natural born citizen, prove the candidate’s age and prove that the candidate meets the residency requirements for President of the United States as prescribed in article II, section 1, Constitution of the United States.


See, John McCain was able to produce his Birth Certificate.
Why won’t Бара́к Хусе́йн Оба́ма?
Why is he spending so much money and time to keep his hidden?
The people who follow him…and this means YOU, selrahC, don’t want you to know. With the Demo☭rat Party, their mantra is “To Hell With The Constitution”; to them, it’s only a piece of paper not worth the ink it’s printed on.
This issue will come to a head next year, whether Оба́ма and the Demo☭rats…or the entire country for that matter…like it or not.

Tags: , , , ,

Comments

Comments and respectful debate are both welcome and encouraged.

Comments are the sole opinion of the comment writer, just as each thread posted is the sole opinion or post idea of the administrator that posted it or of the readers that have written guest posts for the Blogmocracy.

Obscene, abusive, or annoying remarks may be deleted or moved to spam for admin review, but the fact that particular comments remain on the site in no way constitutes an endorsement of their content by any other commenter or the admins of this Blogmocracy.

We're not easily offended and don't want people to think they have to walk on eggshells around here (like at another place that shall remain nameless) but of course, there is a limit to everything.

Play nice!

Comments are closed.

Back to the Top

The Blogmocracy

website design was Built By All of Us