► Show Top 10 Hot Links

Posts Tagged ‘John McCain’

Old And Busted – Standing On Principle, New Hotness – Faux Outrage

by Flyovercountry ( 49 Comments › )
Filed under Conservatism, Republican Party at September 30th, 2013 - 8:00 am

Political Cartoons by Michael Ramirez

Perhaps one of the most bizarre occurrences over this past week took place yesterday afternoon. While Ted Cruz was busy taking his show from the floor of the Senate, after 21 hours of marathon speechifying, to the Rush Limbaugh Show, the Democrat Response to his debate was delivered by John McCain (Rino), Arizona. John McCain did manage to stick with honesty for at least part of his response, in that he and his Senate colleagues did manage to put up an admirable fight for an entire year to keep this disaster from becoming law. I do remember that it should have been passed with greater ease, with the Democrats holding a super majority in the Senate, and a huge advantage in the House. So, yes the gang, including John McCain, did put up a valiant effort. We read on several occasions that the bill was dead, but as it turned out, that was only a ploy by Democrats to keep America from noticing what it was that they were up to. In the end, the Senate did manage to pass the legislation, and they did so using a piece of legislative underhandedness called budget reconciliation. That sentence will be important later on.

I also remember the anger of the American People being expressed via the 2010 Midterm Elections. Those elections were nothing short of a retraining order filed against the President and his team of cheats, crooks, and cronies. More importantly, it was also the voice of the American People saying loud and clear, we want the Obama Agenda stopped, and we want it stopped immediately. I also remember that a couple of weeks later, a lame duck session of Congress got together, with a Democrat super majority in the Senate and a huge Democrat majority still intact in the House, and passed some of the Obama wish list, all of which was blamed on the newly elected Republican majority, still unable to do anything to stop it.

I also remember that the House passed bill after bill repealing Obamacare, and notice that they were reelected also, showing that the American People seem to be on board with that idea. Keep that in mind as you watch McCain’s passionately delivered Democrat response to Ted Cruz’s speech.

 

John McCain’s plea for capitulation as the answer to the voice of the people is at best moronic. I could almost see that as being the case if Obamacare had been mentioned at any level beyond in passing by anyone on Team Romney during the campaign. The fact of the matter is that since Obamacare was 100% a rip off of Romneycare in Massachusetts, and since the same dumb ass establishment that sold us John McCain as the only one who could win in 2008 got us as a group to bite on Mitt Romney for the same exact reason, we mostly took this stink hole of a law off of the campaign table. The vote in 2012 was in no way a referendum on Obamacare, nor did any of the members of the Republican brain trust attempt to make it one. If it had been, the result would have been different. Something else McCain seems to have missed, is the fact that Barack Obama was not the only person to win an election in 2012. Ted Cruz also won an election. He was elected to be the Senator from Texas, and his constituents elected him precisely because he promised to do exactly what he is doing. The Republicans won the House of Representatives, and they won explicitly on the promise to do exactly what they are doing. That, and the simple fact that the only reason that the Republicans currently have as many as 45 Senators is precisely because each and every one of them promised to govern somewhere to the right of Barry Goldwater, someone from Senator McCain’s very state by the way. This should clue the canvas kissing doddering old fool into the realization that while Cruz’s method of continuing this fight might not have been the best tactical method available to the GOP, he and his fellow establishment leaders provided zero alternative. His choice was between doing what he’s done so far, or to simply accept the surrender that he and those who voted for him refuse to accept. Last but not least, for Ted Cruz this fight is not about how best should the party proceed in order to win and maintain power. For Ted Cruz, this fight is about doing what’s best for the American People, and quite frankly, that is something that I personally would like to see a lot more of, from our national leaders. At any point during John McCain’s Democrat response to Ted Cruz, did it ever cross his mind that sometimes, politicians should just do what is right and not worry so much about how it is going to affect their base of power?

Something else struck me about the response to Senator Cruz yesterday, and that was the arguments refuting his 21 hours of debate added up to nothing more than ad hominems, non sequiturs, and straw man attacks. On the replays shown by most media outlets, they carefully edited his comments to appear as though he spent 21 hours reading a Dr. Seuss book and comparing his fellow Senators to Neville Chamberlain. After hearing this, John McCain of course took his comparison out of context, and inserted the Nazi’s as a suitable substitute for the comparison that Cruz actually meant to make. The problem with faux outrage you see is that sometimes, what is actually said or meant will simply not produce the same level of anger that the combatant wishes others to feel. The simple fact is that Senator Cruz did not mention the Nazis, nor did he mention their atrocities, nor did he compare in any way what was happening in the Senate to the Holocaust. John McCain and Chuck Schumer did that, and they did so in a way that you were supposed to believe that Ted Cruz did it. Both of these men should be ashamed of themselves. They should, but then again, I believe that both of them are pathologically prohibited from such feelings.

Just another point to make, and that is this. In a world where many previous U.S. Senators have resorted to reading the Washington D.C. White Pages as a means of keeping the floor, Ted Cruz’s reading of Dr. Seuss is a welcomed respite. A 21 hour speech, which by the way, his had a far higher percentage of actual cogent argumentation than most previous such endeavors, is a difficult thing to piece together. Schumer’s complaint that Dr. Seuss himself would disagree, when that clearly had nothing to do with any of the reasons for opposing this rotten Law is low brow at best. I notice that none of the Democrats will say anything positive about this law that they’ve passed without reading. Not a single one of them is willing to enter into the debate, nor were they while it was passed.

Think about that for a moment. This Law was passed without having been read or debated. It took a year, during which time not one person explained it, defended it, debated its merits, or even estimated its impact. It was passed finally by using budget reconciliation, which by the way opens it up for debate as a budgetary item. So, while Barack Obama stands on his podium, behind the Teleprompter Of The United States of America, and proclaims that he will not allow the Republicans to use the budget as a bargaining chip to blackmail America with respect to this law, it was passed specifically as a budgetary concern, through the budget reconciliation process.

Cross Posted from Musings of a Mad Conservative.

Clash of Clowns: Chris Christie vs. Meghan McCain

by Phantom Ace ( 93 Comments › )
Filed under Republican Party, The Political Right at September 26th, 2013 - 4:00 pm

2 of the most despicable people in the GOP are Chris Christie and Meghan McCain. Both are beloved by Progressive becasue of how they treat those on the Right. Both are attention whores and believe they are the center of the universe. Therefore, the clash between the 2 does not shock me at all as egotists tend to turn on each other.

In a rare moment of sanity, Meghan McCain calls out Chris Christie for caring about himself and not his Party. She is right and a perfect example of that was what he did in the aftermath of Hurricane Sandy. With a week to go in the election and the polls showing Obama and Romney tied, Christie embraced Obama with a photo op and stuck the knife in Romney’s back. This ended any momentum Romney had and gave Obama the advantage he needed to win the election.

Chris Christie did not take too kindly to Meghan McCain’s very rare astute observation and goes ballistic on her in typical fake Guido style.

Tuesday, the younger McCain told CNN’s Piers Morgan that she was “over” Christie’s presumed 2016 candidacy. Current polls put Christie at the head of a crowded field of potential 2016 Republican contenders.

“I’m kind of done with Chris Christie right now,” McCain said.

She referred to Christie’s 2012 GOP convention speech that barely mentioned nominee Mitt Romney. “There’s some level of self-promotion that you have to do, but I would like the next leader of the Republican Party, the next nominee to maybe be a little more interested in helping the country than just their platform.”

For his part, Christie, who is currently running for reelection, was dismissive of McCain’s comments.

“Are we really going to be responding to Meghan McCain?” Christie said, referring to the entire episode as “sophomoric.”

Christie said that he would take a call or criticism from McCain’s father. But Meghan McCain holds no office and doesn’t live in New Jersey.

“Meghan McCain has no standing to be criticizing me,” Christie said.

“I’m not going to respond to somebody just because of their last name.”

I am no fan of Meghan McCain, but I agree with her criticism of  Chris Christie. He is out for himself and a backstabbing scumbag who helped re-elect Obama with his photo-ops. Chris Christie in his dismissive tone of her shows how much of a thin skinned low life he is.

John McCain should be standing up for his daughter against the Jersey Bully. But he is to busy going after Ted Cruz. Nice priorities you have there Senator.

 

Palooka Of The Month: September’s Winner, John McCain

by Flyovercountry ( 66 Comments › )
Filed under Progressives, Republican Party at September 24th, 2013 - 4:00 pm

Political Cartoons by Gary Varvel

If there’s some station in life lower than that of palooka, then John McCain has found it, then he grabbed a shovel and kept digging. I thought I was going to have to work this month to award the winner for September, you know the whole research bit, reading old articles and such. Then this weekend happened. Fox News announced their Sunday Lineup for the morning parade of talking heads which precedes the weekly holiday ritual we call NFL football. As soon as people saw the name Ted Cruz on Fox’s list, the very frightened powers that be, known as the Washington Establishment, decided that something must be done to keep Cruz’s popularity from getting out of control. Chris Wallace, a reporter who does a good job of keeping his political leanings to himself, received unsolicited opposition research. The odd thing about this research however was not so much that its very clear purpose was to destroy the chosen guest. That apparently happens frequently. The odd thing was, who presented that research. It was leaders from Ted Cruz’s own party, his fellow caucus members, colleagues, and more specifically, John McCain.

Karl Rove explains it this way:

Now, I am not one to usually bash Karl Rove, who has been misidentified as the main progenitor of George Bush’s policy and agenda during the Bush Presidency. Rove’s roll was as a paid political consultant only. Rove’s expertise is in winning elections, and helping candidates to shape their message for the purpose of winning elections. Once his candidate is elected, Rove helps develop strategies designed to get their way through tactical politicking. He’s more of a managerial mercenary than anything else. I understand that in this clip, which has a misleading title by the way, he was not defending the tactic taken by Senate Republicans to undercut their own, but merely answering the question as to why they would do this.

What I will fault Karl Rove for is not telling the whole truth during his explanation of why John McCain felt it appropriate to undercut a popular member of his own caucus. The alternative offered by McCain to what Cruz, Lee, and Paul are doing here is capitulation. I don’t know what kind of dialogue has been happening behind the scenes between Cruz and McCain, but I do know that this particular battle stretches back further than this past Thursday’s Republican Caucus Luncheon. I do know that Cruz wants to fight to put an end to this disastrous Law, which will be bad for our nation in ways people haven’t even imagined yet. I do know that McCain wants to capitulate, allow it to become entrenched, and have Republicans win back power so that they can hold the reigns for a vastly strengthened federal behemoth.

In order to achieve this, rather than confront Ted Cruz openly, and argue with him publicly, he took the extraordinary step of anonymous sleaze peddling. He is attempting to lose this fight via stealth and backhanded ad hominem attack. He is not just a palooka kissing canvas, but the guy in the back of his own fighting force, shooting members of his own team. His hope I guess, would be that the enemy, the main stream media and Democrat Establishment, will be nicer to him when after their unfortunate victory. I guess that’s what they call mavericks now. Let’s face it, John McCain has been kissing canvas for so long, there’s not much suspense or mystery in it anymore. Everyone in the political world knows that he’s going to take the dive, and as a consequence, he needs to artificially introduce some pizzazz in how he falls. So, while everyone knows the dive is coming, at least now there is some mystery left as to how he’ll intentionally lose the fight. For this month’s win, he pulled it off by being a low life sneaky duplicitous punk. Kudos to you John McCain, you’ve underwhelmed me, and hopefully many other Americans as well.

Special Note: I saw this letter as a comment to a previous post I’d made, and I believe you should consider reading it. I’ll have more to say about it afterwords.

The Truth About the Health Care Bills
– Michael Connelly, Ret. Constitutional Attorney

Well, I have done it! I have read the entire text of proposed House Bill 3200:
The Affordable Health Care Choices Act of 2009.
I studied it with particular emphasis from my area of expertise, constitutional law. I was frankly concerned that parts of the proposed law that were being discussed might be unconstitutional. What I found was far worse than what I had heard or expected.

To begin with, much of what has been said about the law and its implications is in fact true, despite what the Democrats and the media are saying. The law does provide for rationing of health care, particularly where senior citizens and other classes of citizens are involved, free health care for illegal immigrants, free abortion services, and probably forced participation in abortions by members of the medical profession.

The Bill will also eventually force private insurance companies out of business, and put everyone into a government run system. All decisions about personal health care will ultimately be made by federal bureaucrats, and most of them will not be health care professionals. Hospital admissions, payments to physicians, and allocations of necessary medical devices will be strictly controlled by the government.

However, as scary as all of that is, it just scratches the surface. In fact, I have concluded that this legislation really has no intention of providing affordable health care choices. Instead it is a convenient cover for the most massive transfer of power to the Executive Branch of government that has ever occurred, or even been contemplated. If this law or a similar one is adopted, major portions of the Constitution of the United States will effectively have been destroyed.

The first thing to go will be the masterfully crafted balance of power between the Executive, Legislative, and Judicial branches of the U.S. Government. The Congress will be transferring to the Obama Administration authority in a number of different areas over the lives of the American people, and the businesses they own.

The irony is that the Congress doesn’t have any authority to legislate in most of those areas to begin with! I defy anyone to read the text of the U.S. Constitution and find any authority granted to the members of Congress to regulate health care.

This legislation also provides for access, by the appointees of the Obama administration, in direct violation of the specific provisions of the 4th Amendment to the Constitution, of all of your personal healthcare information, your personal financial information, and the information of your employer, physician, and hospital. All of this is a protecting against unreasonable searches and seizures. You can also forget about the right to privacy. That will have been legislated into oblivion regardless of what the 3rd and 4th Amendments may provide.

If you decide not to have healthcare insurance, or if you have private insurance that is not deemed acceptable to the Health Choices Administrator appointed by Obama, there will be a tax imposed on you. It is called a tax instead of a fine because of the intent to avoid application of the due process clause of the 5th Amendment. However , that doesn’t work because since there is nothing in the law that allows you to contest or appeal the imposition of the tax, it is definitely depriving someone of property without the due process of law.

So, there are three of those pesky amendments that the far left hate so much, out the original ten in the Bill of Rights, that are effectively nullified by this law. It doesn’t stop there though.

The 9th Amendment that provides: The enumeration in the Constitution, of certain rights, shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people;

The 10th Amendment states: The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are preserved to the States respectively, or to the people. Under the provisions of this piece of Congressional handiwork neither the people nor the states are going to have any rights or powers at all in many areas that once were theirs to control.

I could write many more pages about this legislation, but I think you get the idea. This is not about health care; it is about seizing power and limiting rights. Article 6 of the Constitution requires the members of both houses of Congress to “be bound by oath or affirmation to support the Constitution.” If I was a member of Congress I would not be able to vote for this legislation or anything like it, without feeling I was violating that sacred oath or affirmation. If I voted for it anyway, I would hope the American people would hold me accountable.

For those who might doubt the nature of this threat, I suggest they consult the source, the US Constitution, and Bill of Rights. There you can see exactly what we are about to have taken from us.

Michael Connelly
Retired attorney,
Constitutional Law Instructor
Carrollton , Texas

I have no desire to see Republicans in control of a vastly more powerful federal behemoth any more than I wish to see Democrats in that place. I want decentralized power, and a federal government with its power constrained by the states and the people who find themselves governed by that authority. So, capitulating to the inevitability of this sink hole of a law becoming entrenched just so we can get a pissed off U.S. electorate to vote Republican next time is not what I consider to be a victory. That’s the problem with the Republican brand today, in a nutshell. The base wants a smaller government and decentralized power. The establishment wants the same increased scope and power, just with their own people in charge of that increased scope and authority. So, while each and every one of them campaigned on putting an end to Obamacare, and all of its evils, only about half of them are on board with actually putting a stop to all of this.

I don’t know if Cruz’s strategy is the right one or not to achieve our goals. I do know that there has not been a serious alternative conceived of or proposed. I do know that Ted Cruz is willing to stand up and make the argument that many of us want made. He is not being undercut because the establishment feels that there would be a better way to accomplish what Cruz is seeking to accomplish. He is being undercut because the establishment does not wish to see a successful conclusion to this fight. They want to look like they’re genuinely against it all, but they are not. The Republican Establishment has held its base in contempt for years, and the reason why they hate Ted Cruz and Rand Paul is precisely because they sincerely believe in what they have both been saying, and more importantly, their actions have proven to be effective.

Cross Posted from Musings of a mad Conservative.

The bewildered presidency

by Mojambo ( 167 Comments › )
Filed under Barack Obama, Egypt, Iran, Israel, Muslim Brotherhood, Palestinians at August 20th, 2013 - 7:00 am

Obama is starting to see that his vaunted “charm” and”persuasiveness” does not really  work on totalitarians who can see right through him.

by Jonathan S. Tobin

There’s some soul searching going on in the Obama administration as it ponders how they got sidelined in Egypt as the situation there got out of control in a spiral of violence. As the New York Times details in a post-mortem of U.S. policy, the administration went all out to persuade the military that had overthrown the Muslim Brotherhood to compromise and allow the Islamists to rejoin the government. Among other efforts to cajole them or to threaten aid cutoffs, Secretary of Defense Chuck Hagel made 17 often-lengthy phone calls to Egyptian General Abdul-Fattah el-Sisi trying to get him to make nice with the Brotherhood. They even sent two Republican senators—John McCain and Lindsey Graham—to continue the pressure in person in Cairo. And they’re baffled as to why they were ignored as Sisi ordered police and troops to clear out the Brotherhood’s armed camps in Cairo this week.

The easy answer to their questions is that unlike Sisi and the military, President Obama and his foreign policy-team continue to fail to understand that the conflict in Egypt is a zero-sum game. The choice there is between the military and the Brotherhood and the transformation of a key Arab country into an Islamist stronghold. This failure to comprehend the nature of the conflict has led inevitably to paralysis. This spectacle of American impotence is worrisome no matter what you think the U.S. should do about Egypt. But it’s not unrelated to the administration’s other foreign-policy failures that are piling up in the Middle East. Having failed to act decisively to try to avoid a far bigger bloodbath in Syria, and content to waste years on futile diplomacy on the Iranian nuclear threat while devoting disproportionate effort on reviving Israeli-Palestinian talks that have little chance to succeed, it’s obvious that Egypt isn’t the only venue where Obama has demonstrated his cluelessness. [……]

In Egypt, Obama’s main problem is his lack of understanding of the threat that the Muslim Brotherhood poses to both the non-Islamist majority in that country as well as to the region. Having bought into the myth that the Brotherhood’s rise in the aftermath of the fall of the Mubarak regime was an expression of democratic sentiment, it refused to see that if it was allowed to take power it would quickly move to destroy any opposition. The U.S. pressured the military to let Mohamed Morsi take office and then continued to urge them to stand aside as he proceeded to demonstrate that the Brotherhood had little interest in democracy. Even as 14 million people took to the streets to demand that Morsi step down, the president continued to preach restraint and then stood by in puzzlement when the military realized that this was probably their last chance to save their country. Even now, the administration seems stuck in the same mythical “Arab Spring” mindset that is predicated on the idea that a totalitarian movement like the Brotherhood is compatible with liberal democracy. Since they don’t understand what led to the events of the last week, how can we expect the Obama team to put forward a coherent position on what happened and what may unfold in the days to come?

[……..]

Obama came into office thinking that he could charm the Iranians into giving up their nuclear ambitions and that American pressure on Israel could magically create peace with the Palestinians. If problems arose elsewhere in the Middle East, he thought they would be easily resolved with bad guys like Bashar Assad conveniently leaving the stage because President Obama said he “must go.” So as we now peruse the Middle East, we see an Iran that thinks it can go on fooling the West with a diplomatic process intended to stall talks until they can build a nuke while the United States invests precious time and energy on muscling Israel into making concessions to a Palestinian Authority that has no interest in ever signing a peace agreement. And Bashar Assad, with the help of his Iranian and Hezbollah allies, remains in power while winning a civil war that Obama could have spiked two years ago with a timely push.

While critics from both the left and right assail Obama’s indecision that–as I noted on Friday–protects neither American interests nor values in Egypt, this is yet another symptom of an administration that remains besotted with the same preconceptions that it brought to Washington in 2009. While he laments his lack of good choices and the fact that America’s ability to influence events is limited, it is the president’s refusal to face facts about the Brotherhood and some of his other blind spots that is most to blame for the fact that he has left American foreign policy hanging in the wind at a decisive moment in history.

Read the rest – Obama on Egypt; The clueless presidency