First time visitor? Learn more.

The GOP has lousy starters but a great bench

by Phantom Ace ( 189 Comments › )
Filed under Barack Obama, Elections 2010, Elections 2012, Progressives, Republican Party at March 15th, 2011 - 8:30 am

The Republican class of 2010 was probably the single greatest amount of political talent ever elected at the same time. People like Marco Rubio, Allen West, Pat Toomey, Rand Paul, Kristin Noem, Niki Haley, Raul Labrador, Scott Walker and many others are the new face of the GOP. They come from a generation that influenced by Ronald Reagan style Conservatism in the 1980’s. The regime of Barack Hussein Obama opened the way for this flood of fresh blood. They have joined liked minded Conservatives like Paul Ryan and Eric Cantor. The sad part is, this talented pool was not elected a few cycles ago and are not ready for 2012. Instead the possible GOP Presidential candidates for next year are retreads and damaged goods.

It’s not just that the starting lineup is weak.  Their backups are incredibly strong.  The names bandied about as attractive vice presidential options impress more than the presidential candidates who might select them.  Might the party be better served by a sort of political double-promotion?

Republicans won in 2010 not by carting out retreads, but by infusing fresh blood into the party.  Wisconsin Gov. Scott Walker, New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie, Florida Sen. Marco Rubio, and Louisiana Gov. Bobby Jindal—to name just four from a deep Republican bench—exhibit charisma, vigor, and likeability largely absent from those visibly seeking the presidency.  Of greater importance, they have shown fidelity to the limited-government principles currently animating the Republican Party.

They are flawed.  They lack experience.  But remember that Romney served just one term as governor, Palin, not even that.  And, as evidenced by the thin curriculum vitae of the 2008 Democratic nominee, voters, at least outside of GOP primaries, don’t cast ballots on experience.  What the new bloods truly lack is familiarity.  But even familiarity isn’t an unmitigated blessing.  To know Newt or Sarah, particularly after the New York Times gets through with them, isn’t necessarily to love them.

Read the rest: Republicans Need New Blood to Win the Presidency

The Republicans are in a dilemma. Any of the newly elected new bloods, would clobber Obama in an election. However, they promised to serve their constituents and they just were elected. The current crop might be able to beat Obama, but it will be tough. I have said that I might sit 2012 out. I’m talking junk any way, I despise the Obama regime. I just want to vote for someone I like and not against I don’t like. None of the current front runners are offering anything different than the Post Reagan era GOP. Most of them are Rockefeller Republicans or would be manipulated by advisers with agendas.

Obama must be defeated, but I want it to be someone who will turn this nation around. Let’s keep our fingers cross that someone arises who can bring back the Reagan era optimistic Conservatism. The future of our nation depends on it.

Tags: , , , , , , ,

Comments

Comments and respectful debate are both welcome and encouraged.

Comments are the sole opinion of the comment writer, just as each thread posted is the sole opinion or post idea of the administrator that posted it or of the readers that have written guest posts for the Blogmocracy.

Obscene, abusive, or annoying remarks may be deleted or moved to spam for admin review, but the fact that particular comments remain on the site in no way constitutes an endorsement of their content by any other commenter or the admins of this Blogmocracy.

We're not easily offended and don't want people to think they have to walk on eggshells around here (like at another place that shall remain nameless) but of course, there is a limit to everything.

Play nice!

Comments are closed.

Back to the Top

The Blogmocracy

website design was Built By All of Us