Blazing Cat Fur Exposes Adam Gadahn al-Amriki – UNCENSORED!

Blazing Cat Fur Exposes Adam Gadahn al-Amriki – UNCENSORED!

by 1389AD ( 13 Comments › )
Filed under Al Qaeda, Free Speech, Jihad, Liberal Fascism, Political Correctness, Terrorism at June 7th, 2011 - 8:30 am

I recently received an email from Blazing Cat Fur with a link to his video exposing the activities of American jihadi Adam Gadahn. But before I got around to blogging it, YouTube took the video down. It’s now up again on MRC TV. Here’s the story:

Blazing Cat Fur: YouTube says referring to Al Queda as “Depraved Savages” violates “Community Guidelines”

Dear Blazingcatfur:

Thank you for submitting your video appeal to YouTube. After further review of the content, we’ve determined that your video does violate our Community Guidelines and have upheld our original decision.

We appreciate your understanding.

Sincerely, — The YouTube Team

This is the Al Queda video, featuring Adam Gadahn the despicable American Jihadi, that has resulted in the suspension of my account on YouTube. Aside from Gadahn’s own words I referred to al Queda as being “Depraved Savages” for their evident reverence for the Fort Hood Murderous Muslim Maniac Nidal Malik Hasan. That’s it. That’s as bad as it got. This was a straight news story on a matter of public interest otherwise. Clearly YouTube is run by cretins.

Thank God for MRC TV. PS. Check out Quoth The Raven for the Latest on YouTube’s Jihad.

CLICK HERE TO WATCH THE VIDEO.

Tags: Adam Gadahn al-Amriki, Al Qaeda, Blog Censorship, Islamic Imperialism, Islamists, Youtube

This entry was posted on Tuesday, June 7th, 2011 at 8:30 am and is filed under Al Qaeda, Free Speech, Jihad, Liberal Fascism, Political Correctness, Terrorism. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. Both comments and pings are currently closed.

Comments

Comments and respectful debate are both welcome and encouraged.

Comments are the sole opinion of the comment writer, just as each thread posted is the sole opinion or post idea of the administrator that posted it or of the readers that have written guest posts for the Blogmocracy.

Obscene, abusive, or annoying remarks may be deleted or moved to spam for admin review, but the fact that particular comments remain on the site in no way constitutes an endorsement of their content by any other commenter or the admins of this Blogmocracy.

We're not easily offended and don't want people to think they have to walk on eggshells around here (like at another place that shall remain nameless) but of course, there is a limit to everything.

Play nice!

Comments are closed.

Back to the Top