First time visitor? Learn more.

Starting with the scoundrel occupying the White House, why is black racism and violating the law Okay?

by Bob in Breckenridge ( 79 Comments › )
Filed under Barack Obama, Communism, Cult of Obama, Democratic Party, Economy, Elections 2012, Fascism, Free Speech, government, Liberal Fascism, Marxism, Political Correctness, Politics, Progressives, Religion, Socialism at February 28th, 2012 - 11:30 am

Imagine it’s 2012, and John McCain is President of the United States. And for his re-election, he decides that he wants to make sure he gets his message out to white voters, so he forms “White Americans for McCain”, to get white voters to knock on their neighbor’s doors, to volunteer to work at call centers, and to make sure that his message gets out at white or mostly white churches.

Of course, it wasn’t McCain who did that, but Obama did.

Obama and his re-election campaign formed “African-Americans for Obama”, although why this is even necessary, considering he got over 90% of the black vote in 2008, is perplexing.

Unless, of course (and this is why I think they did it) that they’re extremely worried about many blacks having no enthusiasm to vote for him again, because his socialist economic policies and profligate spending, with the help of the dimocrat-controlled House and Senate.

He said numerous times that if we spend these trillions of dollars on various stimulus bills, that millions of unemployed Americans would have good paying, shovel-ready jobs, and that in turn would fix the bad economy and unemployment to go down.

Not only did this out-of-control spending not improve the economy and lower the unemployment rate, regardless of the regime’s lies about it going down the last few months, it has only made black unemployment and job opportunities worse, the worst they’ve been for blacks in over fifty years.

Obama released a video taped specifically for African-Americans and black churches, in which Obama calls them the “faith” community, but we all know what he means- black churches- to support his regime and his failed policies.

Correct me if I’m wrong, but isn’t it these loudmouth libs who are constantly squawking about the separation of church and state?

And also, as is usual with these detestable scumbags, there’s always a double-standard, and it’s only supposed to work in their favor.

White racism? Bad!

Black racism? Good!

Speaking in (mostly) white churches about voting for pro-life candidates? That’s a violation of the First Amendment, call Eric Holder to prosecute whitey!

Black pastors in black churches urging blacks to vote for Obama and other dimocrats? Why, that’s freedom of speech, and should be allowed because of slavery!

Then there’s actor Samuel L. Jackson, who was at least honest enough to say that the only reason he voted for Obama is because he’s black. And after saying that, we don’t even get a collective yawn from the MSF’inM.

But what if, let’s say, Clint Eastwood, had come out and admitted that the only reason he voted for McCain was because he was white? There’d be an uproar in the press and on Capital Hill!

Je$$e Jack$on and Al Sharpton, and the usual gaggle of race-baiting poverty pimps, such as Maxine Waters, Sheila Jackson-Lee, and John Lewis, would all be demanding an apology and boycotts of all of his movies, DVD’s, etc.

All the MSDNC hosts’ heads would explode with outrage that Eastwood would make such an overtly racist statement, and demand his movies not only be boycotted, but that he be burned at the stake!

But the truth is, probably 95% of the blacks who voted for Obama voted from him for one reason, and once reason only. Because of the color of his skin.

Again, who are the REAL racists???

Tags: , , ,

Comments

Comments and respectful debate are both welcome and encouraged.

Comments are the sole opinion of the comment writer, just as each thread posted is the sole opinion or post idea of the administrator that posted it or of the readers that have written guest posts for the Blogmocracy.

Obscene, abusive, or annoying remarks may be deleted or moved to spam for admin review, but the fact that particular comments remain on the site in no way constitutes an endorsement of their content by any other commenter or the admins of this Blogmocracy.

We're not easily offended and don't want people to think they have to walk on eggshells around here (like at another place that shall remain nameless) but of course, there is a limit to everything.

Play nice!

Comments are closed.

Back to the Top

The Blogmocracy

website design was Built By All of Us