► Show Top 10 Hot Links

Posts Tagged ‘Budget Cuts’

Obama regime claims Republicans will kill 70,000 Kids

by Phantom Ace ( 5 Comments › )
Filed under Barack Obama, Headlines, Liberal Fascism, Progressives at March 31st, 2011 - 10:13 pm

Progressives love to claim they are for the children. They use kids as political props. Whenever republicans offer to cut back spending, they claim it will kill Children. Well the Obama regime is making that claim once again.

As Congress struggles to negotiate a budget deal to keep the government running, the head of the U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID) told lawmakers Wednesday that the GOP version of the budget bill would result in the deaths of at least 70,000 children who depend on American food and health assistance around the world.

“We estimate, and I believe these are very conservative estimates, that H.R. 1 would lead to 70,000 kids dying,” USAID Administrator Rajiv Shah testified before the House Appropriations State and Foreign Ops subcommittee.

“Of that 70,000, 30,000 would come from malaria control programs that would have to be scaled back specifically. The other 40,000 is broken out as 24,000 would die because of a lack of support for immunizations and other investments and 16,000 would be because of a lack of skilled attendants at birth,” he said.

The Republican bill, known as H.R.1, was passed by the House, and would fund the government for the rest of fiscal 2011. It would effectively cut 16 percent from the Obama administration’s original fiscal 2011 request for the international affairs account.

They never give up with their lies!

Why Is It, We Can Only Cut Vital Services, And Not Cowboy Poetry?

by Flyovercountry ( 172 Comments › )
Filed under Democratic Party, Politics at March 15th, 2011 - 2:00 pm

During the ongoing budget battle, Harry Reid, the leader of the Democrat Party, whined that the draconian cuts recommended by the Republican controlled house would cause the ending of a federally funded Cowboy Poetry Contest in Nevada.  Heavy sigh here, and then a decision about where to start.  Let us start with the concept of draconian.  One, we as a nation are out of money.  Even if we took Michael Moore’s solution of out right government sponsored thievery, not withstanding his impassioned but totally of the hinges pleas to consider it justified, there just isn’t enough out there to steal from the, “rich,” to continue paying for free goodies for huge swaths of the population.  (Personally, I have a feeling that the, “rich,” as defined by Moore stops at exactly one person on the list above Moore’s personal wad of cash.)  Those of us in the private sector have been spending the money we can afford to, and deciding to limit our outflows to what ever cash we had coming in.  That is how responsible adults budget.  Congress Critters on the other hand have zero attention to pay to trite little things like funding limitations.  They spend what they wish based on political favors, vote buying, and campaign promises, and then worry about where or how to make up the resulting shortfall later.  The gamble of course is that they will be long out of office before anyone notices that we, the taxpayers were royally screwed.  So, when the bill finally comes due, as it has this year, those who are having fun still spending feel like they are entitled to continue the party.  After all, why should Harry Reid show any kind of responsibility when we never made Ted Kennedy take any.  It’s Harry’s turn gosh darn it, and he wants Cowboys to write Poetry in the Nevada Desert.  He wants you and me to pay for it.

To put the term draconian in context, our proposed outflows from the already bankrupt federal coffers is $16,430,000,000,000.  $1,600,000,000,000 of that is money we will be short and subsequently will have to borrow.  The House’s proposed cuts, which in my very humble opinion do not go far enough, are about $61,000,000,000.  The draconian cuts represent three tenths of 1% of the total budget.  If you had a hundred bucks in your hand, We would be asking you to shop around for enough of a bargain to save about 30 cents.  That is exactly what Harry Reid and the President find themselves unable to do.  How much of this are we supposed to take?  At some point we need face and deal with reality.  Putting aside for the moment that these guys are busy spending our national economic productivity like it defacto belongs to them, but clearly those proceeds carry no more value than monopoly money. 

Every time Americans say knock it off already, (for those who were wondering, this is the entirety of the Tea Party Message,) we are assured that vital services like Police, and Fire will not be able to continue.  That somehow, the vital services are eating away at our national wealth and there really is nothing else to cut.  So, in that sense I must thank Harry for reminding us all how that entire line of baloney has been a huge lie perpetrated against us for years.  A Cowboy Poetry writing festival now counts as a vital service.  Don’t get me wrong, I would love to see every cowboy write poetry if that floats their boat.  They enjoy the protections of the First Amendment.  They have a right to enjoy the finer arts such as poetry and music and sculpture, and performance art, and what ever else people think constitutes art.  I will clarify my feelings this way though, like Percy Shelly, Lord Byron, and Robert Burns, let them get other jobs, like cowboying, and pay for their poetic endeavors themselves.  If the masses like their poetry, let them purchase it on the open market, and don’t force us Ohio Residents to pay for it.  The money Harry Reid steals form us, just as deserving folk here in Ohio would be better served supporting and creating jobs through the free market system as than they would being burned in the Nevada Sun.  I am sure that even the least rugged cowboy would be able to protect my vision of that lonesome cow poke driving a heard of cattle across the plain, so that I might enjoy a hamburger at the greasiest of fast food palaces, would be just as capable of using a pen and paper to scribble a few lines of fantastic description just as well, if he did not have fair food and a midway in a small town in Harry Reid’s home state.  In case that ain’t true, here is my entry for next year’s gala event:

Ode to a tumbleweed  –
There’s a sucker born every minute, and Harry Reid courts their vote.

Crossposted at Musings of a Mad Conservative.

GOP to defund Obamacare

by Phantom Ace ( 216 Comments › )
Filed under Democratic Party, Economy, Elections 2010, Progressives, Republican Party at February 10th, 2011 - 8:30 am

The House GOP has announced a plan to enact 74 billion in cuts. This is a small amount but its a start. This follows Rand Paul’s 500 Billion dollar in cuts proposals. These proposals are moving in the right direction, but they have a bigger target. Majority leader Eric Cantor (R-VA) has announced that the GOP will target Obamacare for defunding. Since they can’t repeal the bill due to The Democrats control of the Senate and Obama’s veto pen, they just will not appropriate money for it.

If House Majority Leader Eric Cantor (R-VA) gets his way, Obamacare may die due to lack of funding.

The House has already voted to repeal the measure and a federal judge ruled it unconstitutional.

Nevertheless, Democrats are determined to see it fully implemented.

Senate Republicans failed to repeal the law when Minority Leader Mitch McConnell added it to an aviation bill as an amendment.

But the Virginia Republican told CNS News Tuesday that “one way or the other” there would be no funding for Obamacare in the upcoming continuing resolution that will keep the government funded through fiscal year 2011.

Read the rest:  Republicans will defund Obamacare ‘one way or the other’

Good on the part of the Republicans. Clearly they have heeded the message of the American people. We don’t want this Eugenics based Obamacare nonsense. With their proposals to cut off federal funding of abortion, no bailouts for pensions, the 74 Billion in cuts and defunding Obamacare, they are showing real spine.

I hope they take on Tax and regulatory reform next. Budget cuts are good, but we need incentives for investments which lead to job creation. This is the first time since the Reagan years and briefly in 1995 that GOP is addressing economic concerns. They seem to be going back towards their roots.