► Show Top 10 Hot Links

Posts Tagged ‘bumr50’

Beyond “skewing” – California “Air Board” Must Be Held To Account

by Kafir ( 246 Comments › )
Filed under Blogmocracy, Elections 2010, Guest Post, Politics, Progressives at October 8th, 2010 - 9:00 pm

Blogmocracy in Action!
Guest post by: Bumr50!


The negligence of this body is not startling.

The degree to which they have misrepresented their data, on which the legislature depends in order to formulate standards, is.

Overestimate fueled state’s landmark diesel law

Wyatt Buchanan, Chronicle Sacramento Bureau
San Francisco Chronicle October 8, 2010 04:00 AM

Friday, October 8, 2010

California grossly miscalculated pollution levels in a scientific analysis used to toughen the state’s clean-air standards, and scientists have spent the past several months revising data and planning a significant weakening of the landmark regulation, The Chronicle has found.

The pollution estimate in question was too high – by 340 percent, according to the California Air Resources Board, the state agency charged with researching and adopting air quality standards. The estimate was a key part in the creation of a regulation adopted by the Air Resources Board in 2007, a rule that forces businesses to cut diesel emissions by replacing or making costly upgrades to heavy-duty, diesel-fueled off-road vehicles used in construction and other industries.

340% is not a “miscalculation.”

Even if it is, what accountability do the individuals involved face?
Will industry be permitted to sue for losses incurred by the cumbersome environmental legislation passed under the assumption that the data was accurate?

Oh, I see. It’s that damn economy Bush left us with.

The staff of the powerful and widely respected Air Resources Board said the overestimate is largely due to the board calculating emissions before the economy slumped, which halted the use of many of the 150,000 diesel-exhaust-spewing vehicles in California. Independent researchers, however, found huge overestimates in the air board’s work on diesel emissions and attributed the flawed work to a faulty method of calculation – not the economic downturn.

The overestimate, which comes after another bad calculation by the air board on diesel-related deaths that made headlines in 2009, prompted the board to suspend the regulation this year while officials decided whether to weaken the rule.

In another development, Meg Whitman has stated that if elected Governor she would immediately suspend the new regs.

The Brown camp responded with the succint: “You whore!”

Read more.

– Bumr50

Is Mike Castle going to sabotage GOP hopes in DE?

by Kafir ( 176 Comments › )
Filed under Blogmocracy, Elections 2010, Guest Post, Politics, Republican Party at September 18th, 2010 - 7:00 pm

Blogmocracy in Action!
Guest post by: Bumr50!


It is a very scary thing that Mike Castle called the White House and has yet to call Christine O’Donnell with a congratulatory statement. Even for appearance sake.

In Alaska, Lisa Murkowski is still seriously contemplating running as an independent and thereby thwarting the hopes of Joe Miller.

Lisa Murkowski, the Alaska senator defeated by upstart challenger Joe Miller in the state’s GOP primary, is considering running in the November general election as a write-in or third-party candidate.

Steve Wackowski, spokesman for the two-term senator, said Ms. Murkowski was weighing requests by supporters in Alaska that she stay in the race against Mr. Miller. One option for Ms. Murkowski would be to run on Alaska’s Libertarian Party’s ticket, Mr. Wackowski said, adding that her decision could come by next week, he said. Ms. Murkowski declined to comment.

Joe Miller, a former magistrate who was backed by former Alaska Gov. the tea party, won the August primary by just 2,013 votes.

This act of selfish elitism rubs many the wrong way, but may pale in comparison to the tack that Castle may be taking.

It’s not out of the realm of possibility that Castle may have been garnering support from the White House during his conversations with Barack Obama and Joe Biden on Wednesday.

It’s been 24 hours since Delaware GOP Senate primary winner Christine O’Donnell dethroned nine-term Soros Republican incumbent Mike Castle. As of tonight, he still hadn’t placed an obligatory call to congratulate her — and his e-mail to supporters doesn’t mention her at all, according to the Delaware News Journal.

While it’s obviously pure speculation on the part of this writer, we’ve seen this White House use it’s influence to try and sway election results before.

Is it then so crazy to speculate that perhaps this administration would be more than happy to offer Castle a job or some other favor in exchange for Castle throwing his hat in the ring as a third-party candidate and ensuring a Democrat victory?

Castle may see it as a win for “establishment Republicans” by taking steps to try and quell the Tea Party revolution, which many Beltway types are more uncomfortable with than they let on.

-Bumr50

Choosing our battles

by Kafir ( 149 Comments › )
Filed under Blogmocracy, Guest Post, Media, Politics at June 28th, 2010 - 8:00 pm

Blogmocracy in action!
Guest post by: Bumr50!


Often when I open the Opinion section of my Sunday Pittsburgh Tribune-Review I enjoy reading the frequent commentary by L. Brent Bozell, Founder and President of the Media Research Center.

Today’s piece by Bozell disturbed me, however, not so much for it’s content but it’s timing.

Before I present my opinion on the matter, I must provide some context. I am a HUGE fan of NewsBusters (MRC’s site) and reserve a spot for it’s feed on my homepage. It’s role as a watchdog for conservatism is unparallelled, and I am often inspired by their contributions. In today’s column (here reprinted from Human Events), he takes aim at Grover Norquist, a milquetoast conservative who makes stupid and Quixotic decisions often.

“Comes now the news that fiscal conservative leader Grover Norquist, a man who prides himself on forming grand working coalitions, has joined the board of a group called GOProud, calling the group “an important part of the conservative movement” with a commitment to “core conservative values.”

It’s a gay group. And Norquist thinks social conservatives are going to accept this absolute abandonment?”

I am an individualist at heart, and while I fully understand Mr. Bozell’s objection as a social con. to homosexuality (as it is his right), I cannot help but scream “So what?!” The speed and power with which the Progressives are attacking the United States of America requires an equally powerful response with all of the help we can get. Republicans and Libertarians can afford the luxury of fighting amongst themselves after the ovember elections and maybe beyond. The threat that faces us is much too great to afford us the time it takes to squabble about these divisive issues.

Our momentum is both fleeting and fragile, and in my opinion cannot withstand the infighting that such a luminary as Bozell can bring to bear upon us with ill-timed arguments. Quite frankly, it troubles me that Bozell’s opposition to homosexuality is this high on his priority list. I personally would not have known nor cared what Grover Norquist has been up to if it weren’t for this column, and I’m even more troubled to find it in print than on the internet.

Bozell attempts to explain his reasoning here:

“One disturbing tendency of the old regime is coming back: Fiscal conservatives are already selling out social conservatives in an attempt to build winning coalitions without them. How many times must the GOP learn this is suicide? To win, conservatives must have not a “truce” between fiscal and social conservatives, as Gov. Mitch Daniels has unfortunately called for, but a strong, healthy alliance, with the common goal of victory.

This is perfectly acceptable to most social conservatives. Social conservatives will happily break bread in the cause to support tax cuts or any conservative attempt at fiscal reform.”

And later:

“And yet some libertarians not only refuse to work with social conservatives, they’re actively seeking out and supporting causes in direct opposition to the core beliefs of social conservatives.”

He later goes on to liken Norquist’s action to that of “declaring war” on social conservatism.

To my mind, the one who is preparing for war in this case appears to be Bozell. Our movement is not in a position to have this battle currently, and having read Bozell often enough he knows how divisive this can be and was prepared to fire a salvo anyway.

As I realize that this issue evokes some strong opinions on both sides, I would like to again stress that my issue here is not “fiscally conservative libertarians vs. socially conservative GOP,” but the timing of this rant as it relates to the urgency of our situation, along with the weight Bozell carries among Conservative media.

In the interest of full disclosure, I am a libertarian that embraces fiscal conservatism but carries many socially conservative values. I personally don’t think that marriage should be a public institution period, except when the welfare of children is involved. I am a Christian that worships in a church that frowns on gay marriage.

In my opinion, battles like this are the last thing we need right now.

-Bumr50

Read the whole article quoted here: So Much for “Core Conservative Values”

GRRRR!

by Kafir ( 201 Comments › )
Filed under Barack Obama at October 24th, 2009 - 8:57 am

Obama offers millions in Muslim technology fund

The White House Friday highlighted a new multi-million-dollar technology fund for Muslim nations, following a pledge made by President Barack Obama in his landmark speech to the Islamic world.
The White House said the US Overseas Private Investment Corporation (OPIC) had issued a call for proposals for the fund, which will provide financing of between 25 and 150 million dollars for selected projects and funds.

The Global Technology and Innovation Fund will “catalyze and facilitate private sector investments” throughout Asia, the Middle East and Africa, the White House said in a statement.

Eligible projects would advance economic opportunity and create jobs in areas like technology, education, telecoms, media, business services and clean technology, the White House said.

Shouldn’t he be more worried about the ability to create jobs HERE?

(thanks to Bumr50 for the link)