► Show Top 10 Hot Links

Posts Tagged ‘C. Edmund Wright’

Tsunami Lite, but still room for improvement

by Mojambo ( 232 Comments › )
Filed under Democratic Party, Elections 2010, Elections 2012, Republican Party at November 3rd, 2010 - 2:00 pm

Last nights victory was just a first step in righting the huge mistake that was made in November 2008. As the author points out – not every victory is complete. We did not pick up two seats that we should have – namely Nevada and Delaware. Yet there are still incentives for us to not only  win back the White House but to retake the Senate as well.  For all intent and purposes, Republicans have functional control of the Senate.

by C.  Edmund Wright

Somehow, in every monstrous storm, there are a few ratty old buildings that somehow remain standing in the calm afterwards.  Such is the case with 2010.

Nevadans were so angry at Harry Reid that they punished his son with a resounding defeat — but could not bring themselves to let go of the perceived perks their state gets by having the number one seat in the Senate.  Besides, anything that irritates Chuck Schumer cannot be all bad.

Meanwhile, three big states — California, New York and Illinois — decided to continue their governor-assisted economic suicide. Those are a few of the head scratching paradoxes staining an otherwise historic wave election validating the notion of a conservative ascendency across the land. (More on those later.)

It was a tsunami-lite that shifted dramatically the power in the House of Representatives and many state houses and legislatures. These power shifts will have ramifications in the lives of people everywhere, and will also have impact on the 2012 election, which we are told will begin today.

This was an ascendency so dramatic that it washed the “Obama Senate Seat” away from the Democrats in deep blue Illinois and handed the GOP the majority of the governorships and state legislatures nationwide.  While the national thrashing is what most will talk about, the carnage on state Democrat organizations was even more impressive.

This was a movement so startling that the House Speaker-in-waiting was overwhelmed with the assignment his party had been handed even as their establishment power structure has been spanked in the past months.  Folks saw what they used to like about John Boehner — the humble struggling small businessman.  It’s as if he realized he needed to become that man again. Memo to Mr. Boehner: you do!

[…]

When Barack Obama said “I won,” he was referring to an election where people voted for his “hope and change” without the foggiest notion of what it meant.  Today, conservatives can say “we won” with the confidence that the 2010 electorate knew exactly what it means.  Moderate Republicans had best say nothing, unless it is “yes sir” and “yes ma’am” to the new faces.

[…]

That there were a few election results that seem to counter the conservative ascendency speaks to the fact that there is education to be continued and perhaps certain states beyond saving.  And there might be some historic teachable moments attached to those that will speak to other campaigns.

Reid’s stinky pyrrhic victory in Nevada is crushing emotionally but perhaps a gift in disguise.  Running against Reid and Nancy Pelosi surely boosted conservatives’ chances nationwide, and now they can continue to harm the Democrats — assuming Pelosi stays in the House with a demotion from Speaker.  Moreover, the Republicans can now fight against the Obama-Reid agenda and not appear to be picking on the black guy.  This will help us sell our message of smaller government, and this is critical.

California, Illinois and New York just gave the rest of the country explicit permission to tell them to go to hell when they come begging for bail-outs of their bankrupt state budgets.  By electing Brown, Quinn and Cuomo, voters in these states somehow decided that it makes sense to allow the government unions to simply swallow them whole.  I say: have at it, and the rest of us will sit and watch and use your failures as teachable moments for the next election cycle.

In the meantime, voters in North Carolina and West Virginia take the schizophrenia awards for somehow opting out of the tea party movement.  The Robert Byrd seat is now held by a blue dog so conservative that he ran over the ghost of Reagan in his last minute lurch to the right.  With so many Democrats in the Senate up in two years and Joe Manchin now in, the Dems will suffer the awful fate of “controlling” the Senate while not having the philosophical majority.  This is not bad news for conservatives particularly, as Pat Caddell called it “functional control” for the GOP.

And keep in mind, this is a GOP that now numbers Marco Rubio and Rand Paul among its new stars. This will change the tenor of the senate debate if nothing else.

Read the rest here: Tsunami-Lite

Texas-Sized Lesson

by Mojambo ( 156 Comments › )
Filed under Elections 2010, George W. Bush, Republican Party at March 5th, 2010 - 11:00 am

Although not an expert on Texas politics,  I do recognize a Republican (think John McCain) who has spent far too much time developing Potomac fever and her name is Kay Bailey Hutchison. I am particularly glad that the author called out the Bush/Rove/Karen Hughes  “new tone” strategy mentality of being gentlemen and reaching out to your opponents. I know that Rick Perry seems to have Texas’s economy in a lot better shape then most states and as far as Medina goes – that 9/11 Troofer moment on Beck’s show was a bit much.

by C. Edmund Wright

While the ever-helpful Jurassic media is trying to force-feed conservatives and Republicans groupthink analysis of Rick Perry’s thumping of Kay Bailey Hutchison (KBH), the GOP had better heed the main lesson: The “new tone” era is over.

Consider: The political team and concepts that dominated the Lone Star State just ten years ago and subsequently engineered two presidential elections just got whipped in what amounts to an intramural contest in their own state.

KBH’s incompetent primary campaign was itself a caricature of the senior senator — and it was precisely that caricature that her opponents wanted to portray. Perry and Tea Party candidate Debra Medina did not have to do much but get out of the way and let the KBH campaign prove that the senior senator and her top advisers were indeed all creatures of Washington who are hopelessly out of touch.

And for some reason, Hutchison, along with advisers Karl Rove and Karen Hughes, thought that the best way to counter this was to bring in George Bush 41, George Bush 43, and James Baker to campaign. Were John McCain, Bob Dole, and Olympia Snowe too busy to come?

Oh, and to top it off, the Hutchison campaign ads featured endorsements from the traditional liberal newspapers. Conversely, Perry brought in Sarah Palin to campaign for him and proudly addressed numerous tea party rallies.

[…]

… Remember that Rove was the architect of Bush’s “new tone” governing and communications strategy that was implemented right after Bush was declared the winner in 2000. The new tone was much like being able to “work with people.” The first new tone decision was to not even debate the national raw vote situation, a decision that still fuels anti-Republican sentiment to this day.

The bottom line is that the new tone was never called for by Americans. To think so was to be rather tone-deaf. Any strategy based on the assumption that people just could not get along — and ignores the possibility of legitimate and deep ideological divides — misses the point. By definition, the new tone more or less meant not debating your opponents very vigorously before compromising with them on almost everything.

Read the rest here: Texas-Sized Lesson: The New Tone Era Is Over