► Show Top 10 Hot Links

Posts Tagged ‘Debt Crisis’

Marco Rubio voted against the Debt Ceiling deal

by Phantom Ace ( 7 Comments › )
Filed under Economy, Headlines at August 3rd, 2011 - 3:32 pm

Many Tea Party Conservatives/Libertarians were disappointed in Rubio supporting the Libyan war and having a Wilsonian interventionist foreign policy. Although I still have issues with his foreign policy views, he’s spot on on economic and fiscal issues. Unlike other Tea Party heroes like Allen West who agreed to this boondoggle, Marco Rubio held firm and voted against it!

 “I cannot support this plan because it fails to actually solve our debt problem, fails to diminish the risk of a credit rating downgrade and is not a long-term solution to avert a debt crisis,” Rubio wrote in a news release on his website.  “This plan still adds at least $7 trillion to our debt over 10 years.  It fails to immediately start downsizing government, leaving 98 percent of deficit reduction until after the 2012 election.  By not addressing the biggest driver of our debt, health care spending, this plan ensures Medicare’s looming bankruptcy, while protecting Obama Care’s $2.6 trillion blank check.”

It also could lead to a tax hike, Rubio wrote.

Marco Rubio is at this pioint the odds on favorite for the VP slot in 2012. He gets it on economic and fiscal matters. Now if only he would channel his inner Rightwing Latin self and reject Wilsonian nation building!

Read more:

Progressives use Gabby Giffords as a publicity stunt

by Phantom Ace ( 85 Comments › )
Filed under Barack Obama, Democratic Party, Economy, Liberal Fascism, Media, Progressives, Socialism at August 2nd, 2011 - 11:30 am

 

Progressives love victim-hood. They thrive on it and manipulate people who have had tragic incidents in their life. Whether it is Carolyn McCarthy using her husband’s death on the LIRR back in 94 to win a House seat in Long Island, NY or Charles Johnson’s use of the Norway shooting as some form of vindication against the anti-Jihad, the left loves tragedy.

In the latest stunt, Progressives of both parties brought back Gabby Giffords (D-Arizona) to vote on the debt ceiling increase. She was shot in the head and was still in recovery.  However, the Progressive bi-partisan elite used her as a prop to shame other members into voting for this bill. They even let Gabby Gifford get the final vote as a symbol of bi-partisanship.

Democratic Rep. Gabrielle Giffords of Arizona made a surprise return to Washington Monday to vote in favor of an agreement to raise the debt limit.

 “The #Capitol looks beautiful and I am honored to be at work tonight,” she said in a Tweet.

Lawmakers offered Giffords a standing ovation on the House floor when she showed up for the vote. After it was completed, House Democratic Leader Nancy Pelosi said Giffords’ name inspires the love and admiration of Americans and called the lawmaker the “personification of courage.”

“Thank you, Gabby,” Pelosi added. Giffords, her hair short, waved and thanked members as they applauded the sentiment.

Read teh rest: Gabrielle Giffords votes for debt limit deal

This was a disgusting stunt. Speaker John Boehner, Nancy Pelosi and Barack Hussein Obama clearly coordinated this.  Gabby Giffords was used as a political prop to show some bi-partisan unity. Clearly she hasn’t fully recovered, but this doesn’t matter to our elites. They have no shame and will use any tragedy to their advantage.

That’s the Progressive way!

Friday with the Hammer: The Rodan Edition

by Phantom Ace ( 111 Comments › )
Filed under Barack Obama, Democratic Party, Economy, Elections 2012, George W. Bush, Misery Index, Progressives, Republican Party, unemployment at July 29th, 2011 - 2:00 pm

Speranza is off today, therefore I have volunteered to do Friday with the Hammer.

The debt ceiling debate has come down to the wire. House Speaker John Boehner is introducing a 2 stage bill that extends the debt ceiling for 6 months. A commission will be formed for fiscal and tax reform, then those recommendations will be included in the phase 2 debt ceiling vote. Personally and I know this sounds cynical, I don’t think the GOP should do any fiscal or tax reform until after the 2012 elections. Just like the Left rammed Obamacare down our throats, we should, after 2013 with control of the House, Senate and  White House, ram tax, regulatory and fiscal reform down their throats.

Charles Krauthammer is urging Republicans to keep their powder dry and pass the Boehner plan. His thinking is, why do any reforms that help Obama? Plus with just the House, Democrats would have input into any reforms made.

We’re only at the midpoint. Obama won a great victory in 2008 that he took as a mandate to transform America toward European-style social democracy. The subsequent counterrevolution delivered to that project a staggering rebuke in November 2010. Under our incremental system, however, a rebuke delivered is not a mandate conferred. That awaits definitive resolution, the rubber match of November 2012.

I have every sympathy with the conservative counterrevolutionaries. Their containment of the Obama experiment has been remarkable. But reversal — rollback, in Cold War parlance — is simply not achievable until conservatives receive a mandate to govern from the White House.

Lincoln is reputed to have said: I hope to have God on my side, but I must have Kentucky. I don’t know whether conservatives have God on their side (I keep getting sent to His voicemail), but I do know that they don’t have Kentucky — they don’t have the Senate, they don’t have the White House. And under our constitutional system, you cannot govern from one house alone. Today’s resurgent conservatism, with its fidelity to constitutionalism, should be particularly attuned to this constraint, imposed as it is by a system of deliberately separated — and mutually limiting — powers.

Given this reality, trying to force the issue — trying to turn a blocking minority into a governing authority — is not just counter-constitutional in spirit but self-destructive in practice.

Read it all: The Debt-Ceiling Divide

I am no fan of Speaker Boehner and the Rockefeller Republicans. They are at heart liberals who like big government, have a soft spot for Islam and believe in nation building wars. That said, the Tea Party Conservatives and Libertarians still don’t have enough strength to enact their reforms. If reforms are done, Obama and the Progressives will have input. This means whatever reforms are done will be watered down. 

The psychological effects might help the markets and thus the economy. If the economy shows any slight improvement, it will be Obama who gets credit. Therefore, it’s not in Conservatives’ interest to enact any reform. A sluggish economy helps the GOP and would make it easier to defeat Obama.  Hence, it’s not in our interest to enact any reform until 2013.

As of this writing Obama’s approval is in the mid 40’s. Any normal politician would be in the low 30’s. I know many here don’t want to believe the numbers, but we should assume they are accurate. A slight improvement in economic conditions will send his numbers into the low 50’s. This would make him even tougher to beat. Many people have an emotional investment in Obama because he symbolizes to them a way for America to cleanse its sins. We are dealing not with a politician, but a pseudo religious cult of personality. We have to keep this in mind. We should not help Obama improve the economy.

Many will not like what I wrote, but I am looking at it from a Machiavellian viewpoint. Vote for whetever BS cuts are proposed. The markets will not be impressed and the economy will stay sluggish. A bad economy makes it easier to beat Obama. Just think about this long term. Then after 2013, we can purge the McCain-Bush Syndicate wing of the GOP.

White House issues Veto statement on Boehner’s bill

by Phantom Ace ( 5 Comments › )
Filed under Barack Obama, Democratic Party, Economy, Elections 2012, Headlines, Republican Party at July 26th, 2011 - 4:30 pm

White House advisors have issued a statement on Boehner’s debt ceiling plan. They have recommended that Obama vetoes it.

 The Administration strongly opposes House passage of the amendment in the nature of a substitute to S. 627. If S. 627 is presented to the President, the President’s senior advisors would recommend that he veto this bill.

Obama wants this veto.