► Show Top 10 Hot Links

Posts Tagged ‘Dick Morris’

Obama shifts Left

by Phantom Ace ( 5 Comments › )
Filed under Barack Obama, Democratic Party, Liberal Fascism, Progressives, Socialism, Special Report, Tranzis at April 27th, 2011 - 12:14 pm

After the 1994 Midterm defeat, then President Clinton shifted to the Center-Right. The result was he was the first Democrat since FDR to win re-election. By adopting many Conservative positions and along with a then fiscal responsible Republican Congress, the economy boom. Barack Hussein Obama is doing the opposite. He’s actually shifted even farther left and even is engaging in 3rd World Liberation rhetoric.

Two months ago, Washington was abuzz with speculation that Obama was going to follow Bill Clinton’s reelection strategy and move to the center, forsaking the liberal agenda that cost him control of the House in 2010. Now it is evident that he has decided to come down hard left and wage his reelection fight from his liberal bunker, firing shots at Republican cuts in Medicare, pushing tax increases on the rich, and attributing the gas-price increase to speculators.

Very possibly the decision to tack to the left was not entirely voluntary. With the Republicans constantly confronting him with budget cuts and spending reductions, Obama cannot portray himself as a centrist. Every day, he is on the defensive against proposals for Republican attempts to rein in federal outlays. Against a backdrop of repeated confrontation, he cannot move to the middle. Indeed, there is no middle. His budget compromises with Boehner are not middle ground, they are partial surrenders, grudging acceptances of budget cuts he would never otherwise allow.

[…]

The problem with a leftist strategy is that the vote share a Democrat can attract with it has a very low ceiling – in the low 40s. Economic populism just doesn’t play that well outside of the Democratic left.

Unlike bill Clinton, Barack Hussein Obama is a 3rd world Liberation Ideologue. he is a true bel;iever in Leftist ideas and will not budge towards the center. WItha  compliant media, many Americans are not aware of his Hard Left nature. Hence Obama never calls out for his demagogue style rhetoric. His leftist ideology has turned a recession into a stagflation hell. Many Americans are seeing the effects of his policies and are not falling for the media’s lies. Obama needs to get hammered at his un American ideas.

The coming fall of the House of Saud

by Bob in Breckenridge ( 114 Comments › )
Filed under Barack Obama, Democratic Party, Economy, Elections 2012, Environmentalism, History, Islam, Politics, Progressives, Regulation, Republican Party, Saudi Arabia, Socialism, Tea Parties, Transportation at March 11th, 2011 - 4:00 pm

Dick Morris has a new column out about what will happen, when, not if, the Saudi monarchy is deposed, and how the Republicans need to ratchet up their rhetoric about new drilling for oil ASAP.

NEXT TO FALL: SAUDI ARABIA

By DICK MORRIS & EILEEN MCGANN

Published on DickMorris.com on March 9, 2011

We can do without Libya’s two million barrels a day of oil albeit with significant disruptions in the global economy. But if we lose Saudi Arabia’s nine million, we will face a global catastrophe.

And the Saudi monarchy will be the next casualty of the Middle East revolutionary wave. The king is 86 years old and very ill. The next two men in line are both over 80 and both sick. And, behind those three in line are 7,000 princes, each ambitious and at war with one another. The monarchy will not be able to buy off the opposition for long with cash subsidies. (We are indebted to Bret Stephens of the Wall Street Journal for these insights).

The fall of Saudi Arabia will accelerate the stagflation that will mar the final two years of the one-term Obama Presidency.

Republicans need to ratchet up their rhetoric about new drilling for oil. The 2008 liberal counter-argument that new drilling is not a short term solution begs the question of why the Administration has not used the intervening two years to effectuate the longer term solution that it offered.

Republicans need to be more vocal in criticizing the Administration for its defacto moratorium on off-shore drilling. Obama’s people are so sensitive to these criticisms that they just approved the first permit since the BP spill.

[…]

Click here to read the rest

Rodan Update:

If Saudi Arabia collapses, Obama’s moratorium has put us in a tough spot. we are importing more and producing here less.

Nice going there Barack Hussein Obama.

 

The New Republican Right Ascending

by Mojambo ( 161 Comments › )
Filed under Elections 2010, Republican Party, Tea Parties at October 21st, 2010 - 11:30 am

Dick Morris writes what I and several other commenters  here have always maintained – that economic and  tax issues are winners because they will appeal to those that left the Republican Party after the Progressive betrayals by both Bush I and II. An obsession on red meat and polarizing issues  is self-defeating . We cannot turn off Independents, suburbanites and the much derided “soccer moms”. For too many elections Republicans have written off vast swaths of the country and electoral votes, but there is no reason why the GOP cannot be competitive in many of the Blue states. We have to be a national party not a regional party and each region has its own version of Republicanism. As Morris says, opposition to Obamacare, the Porkulus,  combined with fear of rising unemployment,  will bring us the House, not opposition to Roe v. Wade.

by Dick Morris

A fundamental change is gripping the Republican grass roots as they animate the GOP surge to a major victory in the 2010 elections. No longer do evangelical or social issues dominate the Republican ground troops. Now economic and fiscal issues prevail. The Tea Party has made the Republican Party safe for libertarians.

There is still a litmus test for admission to the Republican Party. But no longer is it dominated by abortion, guns and gays. Now, keeping the economy free of government regulation, reducing taxation and curbing spending are the chemicals that turn the paper pink.

It is one of the fundamental planks in the Tea Party platform that the movement does not concern itself with social issues. At the Tea Parties, evangelical pro-lifers rub shoulders happily with gay libertarians. They are united by their anger at Obama’s economic policies, fear of his deficits and horror at his looming tax increases. Obama’s agenda has effectively removed the blocks that stopped tens of millions of social moderates from joining the GOP.

[…]

This preference for economic and fiscal questions over social issues is not a top-down decision of the Tea Party leadership. There really is no Tea Party leadership. Those who conduct its affairs are mere coordinators of local groups where the real power lies. The entire affair is a grass roots-dominated movement. I was shocked to learn that the teapartypatriots.org umbrella group, to which more than 2,800 local affiliates belong, has a total payroll of $50,000 per month, with only seven paid staff members, some of them low-level at that. This group, which embraces more than half of the self-described Tea Party groups in the U.S., leaves up to each local organization how to proceed and what to do. It is a bottom-up movement.

The determination to focus on fiscal and economic issues, to the exclusion of social questions, wells up from below as individual members vent their concerns over ObamaCare, stimulus spending and cap-and-trade legislation. It is around opposition to Obama’s agenda, not Roe v. Wade, that the movement is organized. It is a new day on the Republican right.

Read the rest here: The New Republican Right

Obama vs. Israeli regime

by Mojambo ( 110 Comments › )
Filed under Barack Obama, Israel at April 1st, 2010 - 8:30 am

Funny how Obama is more interested in regime change in Israel rather then in Iran. Obama has associated himself with Israel haters just about  all his life so it is not surprising that he has a built in antipathy towards the Jewish state. What is surprising is that he is going against the wishes of the American people in trying to turn that country  into a pariah nation. Even most Democrats will blanche at that idea.

by Dick Morris

Why is President Barack Obama so obviously humiliating Israeli Prime Minister Bibi Netanyahu? Why is Secretary of State Hillary Clinton negating everything she said when she represented New York state and piling on the Jewish state?

They want Netanyahu out. Specifically, they want him to feel such pressure that he dumps his right-wing coalition partners and forms a new government with the center-left party Kadima, headed by former Prime Minister Tzipi Livni. Livni, who thinks nothing of trading land for peace, no matter how flawed the peace might be, will then hold Netanyahu’s government hostage and force it to bend to the will of Washington and sign a deal with the Palestinians that cedes them land in return for a handful of vague vapors and promises, none of which will be kept.

On March 3, Livni said, in a Knesset debate, that since Netanyahu took control “Israel has become a pariah country in the world.” She is trying to use Obama’s and Clinton’s rejection of Netanyahu’s course to force her way into the government. And Obama and Clinton are intent on helping her do so by publicly humiliating Netanyahu.

Netanyahu insists that he’d be happy to negotiate a peace accord. But, as he told me last year, “I just don’t have a peace partner with whom to negotiate.”

The Palestinians are expert at playing “good cop/bad cop” with Israel. The good cop — the Palestinian Authority — wants to negotiate a peace deal and insists on signs of Israeli good faith in order to do so. Meanwhile, the bad cop — Hamas — fires missiles at Israel from Gaza, land Israel ceded to the Palestinians in order to promote the peace process earlier in the decade.

Any peace deal with the Palestinian Authority will not be binding on Hamas, and the pattern of Gaza will likely play out again: First, Israel cedes land to the Palestinian Authority. Second, Hamas seizes the newly ceded land through elections or military action. Third, Hamas refuses to recognize the peace deal and uses the newly acquired territory as a base from which to launch further attacks against Israel.

Read the rest here: Obama vs. Israeli regime