► Show Top 10 Hot Links

Posts Tagged ‘James O’Keefe’

Man up, Mr. Johnson.

by snork ( 98 Comments › )
Filed under Crime, LGF, Media at January 30th, 2010 - 3:00 pm

On Tuesday, January 26, the oddball blog Little Green Footballs ran the following thread:

ACORN Sting Filmmaker Arrested at Sen. Landrieu’s Office

US News | Tue, Jan 26, 2010 at 2:05:27 pm PST

Conservative activist James O’Keefe, who posed as a pimp in the infamous ACORN sting videos, has been arrested in New Orleans in what appears to be an attempt to wiretap the office of Democratic Sen. Mary Landrieu.

He quotes the left-wing Atlantic saying the following:

FBI Special Agent Steven Rayes alleges that O’Keefe aided and abetted two others, Joseph Basel and Robert Flanagan, who dressed up as employees of a telephone company and attempted to interfere with the office’s telephone system.

Interestingly the Atlantic article quoted has an update:

According to several news outlets, a law enforcement official says O’Keefe wasn’t trying to bug Landrieu’s office, but rather to see how staffers would react if phones weren’t working.

But there’s no update at Johnson’s site. What there is is this oblique reference two days later:

Video: Breitbart on MSNBC

US News | Thu, Jan 28, 2010 at 4:04:41 pm PST

Here’s MSNBC’s latest update on the case of James O’Keefe, arrested in the office of Sen. Mary Landrieu, featuring Andrew Breitbart defending himself and O’Keefe.

Excuse me, that’s not a retraction, and that’s not an update. First of all, you have to click the link to the video to even see what’s being said. Secondly, while the original statement was rather clear that law enforcement was alleging wiretapping, this statement is completely sanitized. It’s not a retraction of the earlier claim. Coward.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

It looks like Johnson isn’t the only one acting in bad faith when it comes to “correcting” this story. Great company you keep there, Johnson. Rather’s old outfit. It appears that even they are trying to correct their errors, even though they don’t seem to be in any hurry.


(Don’t forget to vote in the Blogmocracy Awards! One vote per award, per day~ Voting ends Feb. 5)

Law Enforcement Official: No Wiretap Attempt by O’Keefe

by Mojambo ( 228 Comments › )
Filed under Politics at January 28th, 2010 - 10:00 am

Well I still am curious as to what they were doing there and I certainly think it is foolish to be breaking the law, yet this puts a whole new spin on what happened the other day.  I’ll bet if it gets thrown out of court, the MSM will have the story buried  on page 27. Good for Andrew Breitbart for following this story.

by Patterico

Looks like law enforcement and James O’Keefe’s supporters agree: he did not intend to wiretap Mary Landrieu:

A law enforcement official says the four men arrested for attempting to tamper with the phones in the New Orleans office of Sen. Mary Landrieu (D) were not trying to intercept or wiretap the calls.

The Washington Post, which this morning claimed otherwise, today had to retract that mistake — a grave error that Andrew Breitbart socked them for last night, and I socked them for this morning. Here is the relevant part of their embarrassing correction:

Earlier versions of this story incorrectly reported that James O’Keefe faced charges in an alleged plot to bug the office of Sen. Mary Landrieu. The charges were related to an alleged plot to tamper with a phone system. The headline incorrectly referred to a plot to bug the phone and a caption incorrectly referred to an alleged wiretap scheme.

That’s the second O’Keefe correction by the same reporter. Time to retire her from this story.

So there was no intent to wiretap. Let’s dispel that idea now. Nobody is claiming he was trying to bug Landrieu. Everyone who compared this to Watergate was wrong, wrong, wrong — and should be embarrassed. Period.

The only question now is what he and 3 other men did intend to do.

The Government position is that O’Keefe & Company wanted to shut down Landrieu’s phone system:

Instead, the official says, the men, led by conservative videomaker James O’Keefe, wanted to see how her local office staff would respond if the phones were inoperative. They were apparently motivated, the official says, by criticism that when Sen. Landrieu became a big player in the health care debate, people in Louisiana were having a hard time getting through on the phones to register their views.

That is, the official says, what led the four men to pull this stunt — to see how the local staffers would react if the phones went out. Would the staff just laugh it off, or would they express great concern that local folks couldn’t get through?

Nice theory. Let’s see if you can prove it.

Note that even the Government now believes that O’Keefe targeted Landrieu for the reason I previously highlighted — first last night (subtly, in UPDATE x4), and somewhat less subtly this morning — namely, her claim that phone lines were “jammed” when constituents tried to reprimand her for the Louisiana Purchase.

Read the rest.