► Show Top 10 Hot Links

Posts Tagged ‘NY Post’

Et tu, ‘Tarjay’?

by Kafir ( 61 Comments › )
Filed under Dhimmitude, Multiculturalism, Political Correctness, Religion at February 4th, 2010 - 8:00 pm

On sale exclusively at Target is this innocent-looking toy globe. Thousands of these trinkets have already moved out of malls, from Queens to Honolulu, and landed in living rooms and kids’ rooms across America.

But folks who forked over a buck for the miniature worlds got less than they bargained for.

These planetary models contain just about all the countries on Earth — from France to China, Singapore to Spain. But there’s one glaring exception:

Israel.

In the spot where Israel should be, this word is printed: “Palestine.” Some of those who unwittingly purchased the Israel-free orbs feel as if they’ve played a role in a modern-day Final Solution.

[…]

“We didn’t want to offend any of our guests,” said Amy Reilly of Target customer relations, who initially said the omission of Israel was due to lack of space on the item. (Isn’t “Palestine” a longer word?)

Read the rest.

(thanks to Speranza for the tip)

I am glad that they are trying to “correct” the situation, but it never should have happened in the first place. Apparently it wasn’t an oversight or they would not have had the excuses handy. But at least they did respond this time – not as much luck with the “islam is the light” dolls.

Amy Reilly of Target’s Media Relations office called Lee and directed parents “To talk to Mattel if you have any issues with the doll.” Reilly carefully stated, “We have not had a national recall on those dolls.” When told of parents concerns about the doll Reilly stated, “The doll is a well selling doll.” She said, for anything else “I would continue to try reaching Mattel.”


(Don’t forget to vote in the Blogmocracy Awards! One vote per award, per day~ Voting ends Feb. 5)

Nightmare in the Middle East

by Mojambo ( 258 Comments › )
Filed under Afghanistan, Al Qaeda, Egypt, Hamas, Hezballah, Iran, Iraq, Islamists, Israel, Lebanon, Middle East, Pakistan, Saudi Arabia, Syria, Taliban, Terrorism, Turkey at January 31st, 2010 - 9:00 am

Yes the Middle East/North Africa/Central Asia is a rotten neighborhood. How’s that Cairo speech apologizing for all our sins working for you Barry? I think that Egypt post Mubarak is the nation (after Iran) to worry about the most. Mubarak might be a corrupt, back stabbing, duplicitous autocrat– but they at least Egypt (since 1977)  is nominally a friend. We have spent billions (bribes as far as I am concerned) on Egypt and its military in order for them to nominally agree to maintain the Camp David accords. A return to Nasserism could be a disaster for all. As for Pakistan, I hope one day India launches a first strike to take out that failed nations nukes. I am glad that Peters rightfully understands that the Palestinians are not the problem over there but a symptom.

by Ralph Peters

Whatever planet Earth may find in short supply in 2010, violence and misrule will remain abundant, from the most-recent round of Muslim-vs.-Christian massacres in Nigeria to Venezuelan strongman Hugo Chavez’s delight in unleashing his thugs on students marching for freedom.

But no region — not even sub-Saharan Africa — competes with the greater Middle East when it comes to wanton savagery, thwarted opportunities and the danger posed to innocent populations around the world. With fanatical terrorists of unprecedented brutality, Islamist extremists pursuing nuclear weapons, rogue regimes, disintegrating states and threats of genocide against Israel, the lands of heat and dust between the Nile and the Indus form a realm of deadly failure that will haunt the civilized world throughout our lifetimes.

A survey of the region’s key countries — and problems — doesn’t offer much good news for the Obama Administration’s naive foreign policy efforts:

LEBANON: This isn’t a country — it’s a temporary stand-off. Recently, Prime Minister Saad Hariri, whose father, Rafik, was assassinated by Syria, had to make a humbling visit to Damascus. Syria’s decades-long penetration of the government in Beirut and various Lebanese factions (not least, its backing of the Hezbollah terror organization) has kept Beirut dependent on Damascus to break the political gridlock in parliament. Meanwhile, Hezbollah has been rearming mightily in the wake of its 2006 war with Israel. A new war would devastate much of Lebanon — if internal strife doesn’t do it first.

EGYPT: A US client long counted among the most stable states in the Middle East, Egypt faces a potential succession crisis as octogenarian president Hosni Mubarak, who’s ruled the country for almost three decades, grooms his singularly unimpressive son, Gamal, to take over upon his death. The government and armed forces are more factionalized than they seem to outsiders, Islamist movements have proven ineradicable, and violence against Egypt’s minority Christians is on the rise again.

—————————————-

TURKEY: Long in NATO, but denied membership in the European Union, Turkey has grappled with an identity crisis. Increasingly, its political bosses back an Islamic identity. The ruling AKP (Justice and Development Party) soft-peddles its religious agenda when dealing with the West, but has been methodically dismantling the secular constitution left behind by Kemal Ataturk — who rescued Turkey from oblivion 90 years ago.

Meanwhile, Turkey’s current leaders are dragging the country toward the Middle East and away from the West.

—————————————-

SAUDI ARABIA: Its two main exports are oil and fanaticism. Saudi funding supports a global effort to drive Muslims into the fold of its severe Wahhabi cult — and to prevent Muslims (including those in the US) from integrating into local societies.

—————————————-

IRAN: Racing to acquire nuclear weapons, delighting in the prospect of a cataclysmic war that would lead to the “return of the hidden imam,” beating the hell out of its own people in the streets, murdering members of the intelligentsia, and explicit in its vows to destroy Israel, the government of Iran continues to be protected by China and Russia. There will be no meaningful sanctions. Over the next few years, we’ll see a nuclear test in the southeastern desert region of Baluchistan.

—————————————-

PAKISTAN: 180 million anti-American Muslims, thanks to generations of politicians who took American aid while playing the anti-American card with their constituents. The government won’t crack down on the Taliban factions it’s preserving for a reconquest of Afghanistan after we exit. It sponsors terror attacks against India, then leaves it to us to calm India down. Promised another $7.5 billion in aid, Pakistan’s response has been not only to bite the hand that feeds it, but to gnaw it to a bloody pulp. And, in an act of strategic folly, we’ve left our troops in Afghanistan dependent upon a single supply line that runs for over a thousand miles through Pakistan

Read the rest.


(Don’t forget to vote in the Blogmocracy Awards! One vote per award, per day~ Voting ends Feb. 5)

Obama doubles down on his radical Progressive agenda

by Phantom Ace ( 212 Comments › )
Filed under Barack Obama, Politics at January 28th, 2010 - 7:30 am

Last night’s State of their UnionAddress revealed Obama’s fanaticism. He is really a Hard Left Ideologue who will stop at nothing to impose his agenda. Rather than admit mistakes, he blamed Bush, pharmaceutical companies, his own allies on Wall Street, banks, Republicans and he outright lied last night. He called for the Senate to pass his economically disastrous Cap-N-Trade that will be a de facto tax increase on Americans. He attacked his opponents then hypocritically ask them to stop attacks. Obama claimed the economy was good, even with high unemployment. His speech was something Hugo Chavez, Fidel Castro, Idi Amin or Benito Mussolini would be proud of. He demagogues while at the same time making false promises to the public.

There’s a story of an ex hausted tenor at La Scala who, facing repeated cries of “Encore,” responded that he couldn’t go on. A man rose in the audience to say, “You’ll keep singing until you get it right.”

That seems to be the defining principle of the Obama administration — whose response to every problem, every setback, every hiccup and challenge has been, simply, “more Obama.”

Indeed, for people who aren’t sticklers for political jargon, it will be a shock that last night was Obama’s first State of the Union Address, since it was his third formal address to a joint session of Congress. Yet for all of the political déjà vu, what was most surprising last night was the degree to which Obama delivered even more of the same.

Read the rest

Jonah Goldberg breaks down Obama’s narcissism. Rather than realize his Totalitarian Progressive Ideology is being rejected by the American public, he thinks the problem is not enough of him. This reveals his egoism in his own power of persuasion. He is still that radical University Professor that can convince his students that he is right and they must change their views. Barack Hussein Obama can’t figure out that the American public is rejecting Progressivism. The Public is also rejecting him and the more he goes out there, the more he will be hated.

His attitude just reveals the nature of Progressives. They truly believe that that people don’t know what’s good for them. His arrogance and lies has been his undoing. Obama is his own worst enemy.

Update: Obama also did something unprecedented, he attacked the Supreme Court for a decision they made. This is a tactic used by 3rd World dictator. They go after the Independent Judiciary if they don’t agree with the court decisions. Obama is clearly a 3rd World Totalitarian radical.

Cursing capitalism

by Mojambo ( 100 Comments › )
Filed under Media, Politics at January 2nd, 2010 - 3:00 pm

The first thing the Republicans ought to do if they retake the House is defund NPR (aka National Palestine Radio). Anyone ever hear what a “male” NPR reader sounds like? (Hint – he is the prototypical  “girlie man”). Recently NPR tried to get Mara Eliason to leave the Fox News All Stars on Special Report with Bret Baier because Fox is “biased” which coming from NPR is hilarious. Notice that those who trash capitalism – George Soros, Michael Moore, Noam Chomsky, Ted Turner, etc. have no problems n using the capitalist system to enrich themselves. As for the late Joan Kroc (the widow of McDonalds founder Ray Kroc – and former owner of the San Diego Padres):

1.  Thanks for poisoning the world with your rotten hamburgers (as former Padre pitcher Goose Gossage once said).

2.    She was always a leftie

As Jonah Goldberg points ought – to use Bernie Madoff as an example of capitalism as “having a bad year” is similar to using Michael Vick and O.J. Simpson  as an example that Black Americans have had a “bad year”. The faults of “capitalism” (greed, etc.) are not capitalist faults but humanity’s faults.

by Jonah Goldberg

On the last day of 2009, that awful year, I was listening to a report on National Public Radio. Reporter Tamara Keith presented a by now familiar recap of the worst financial and corporate scandals of the decade, from Enron and Martha Stewart to Tyco and Bernie Madoff. It was a depressing slog of greed, venality and theft. When the report was over, “Morning Edition” host Steve Inskeep summarized it with a tart, “the decade in capitalism.”

I don’t want to single out Inskeep, since he was doing what pretty much the entire media establishment has done, particularly of late: reducing “capitalism” to its alleged sins.

Madoff: Not a poster boy for all financiers.

Madoff: Not a poster boy for all financiers.

And that’s the point. There are few areas of life where a thing responsible for so much good gets so little credit for it.

Imagine if I were to collect the most infamous deeds of African-Americans over the last decade — say Michael Vick’s dog-fighting scandal and O.J. Simpson’s most recent criminal exploit — and then put a bow on it with the phrase “the decade in black America.”

What if I did the same thing with Jews? Bernie Madoff, the face of Jewish America! Do the scandals of Rod Blagojevich, Charlie Rangel and John Edwards define the Democratic Party from 2000 to 2010? Do Abu Ghraib and the balloon boy sum up America?

Consider NPR. As a brand, it claims to be standing athwart capitalism because it’s “public.” What that means exactly is a bit unclear, since it still allows corporations to fund its programming in exchange for audio endorsements none dare call commercials and relies on the kindness of listeners to keep it afloat — listeners who, one way or another, make their money from you-know-what.

Indeed, speaking of the decade in capitalism, National Public Radio failed to mention that Joan Kroc, widow of Ray Kroc, the founder of McDonald’s, left more than $200 million to NPR in 2003. Mrs. Kroc’s generosity of spirit was her own, but the wampum is all capitalism’s, baby.

Read the rest.